Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, social media are said to have an impact on the public discourse and communication in the society. In particular, social media are increasingly used in political context. More recently, microblogging services (e.g., Twitter) and social network sites (e.g., Facebook) are believed to have the potential for increasing political participation. While Twitter is an ideal platform for users to spread not only information in general but also political opinions publicly through their networks, political institutions (e.g., politicians, political parties, political foundations, etc.) have also begun to use Facebook pages or groups for the purpose of entering into direct dialogs with citizens and encouraging more political discussions. Previous studies have shown that from the perspective of political institutions, there is an emerging need to continuously collect, monitor, analyze, summarize, and visualize politically relevant information from social media. These activities, which are subsumed under “social media analytics,” are considered difficult tasks due to a large numbers of different social media platforms as well as the large amount and complexity of information and data. Systematic tracking and analysis approaches along with appropriate scientific methods and techniques in political domain are still lacking. In this paper, we propose a methodological framework for social media analytics in political context. More specifically, our framework summarizes most important politically relevant issues from the perspective of political institutions and corresponding methodologies from different scientific disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamic L, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, pp 36–43

  • Adar E, Adamic L (2005) Tracking information epidemics in blogspace. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence, pp 207–214

  • Adar E, Adamic L, Zhang L, Lukose R (2004) Implicit structure and the dynamics of blogspace. Paper presented at the 13th international World Wide Web conference

  • Aday S, Farrel H, Lynch M, Sides J, Kelly J, Zuckerman E (2010) Blogs and bullets: New media in contentious politics. Technical report, U.S. Institute of Peace

  • Aggarwal CC, Han J, Wang J, Yu PS (2003) A framework for clustering evolving data streams. In: Proceedings of VLDB’03, pp 81–92

  • Agrawal D, Budak C, El Abbadi A (2011) Information diffusion in social networks: observing and influencing societal interests. In: Proceedings of VLDB’11

  • Ammann SL (2010) A political campaign message in 140 characters or less: the use of Twitter by U.S. Senate Candidates in 2010. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725477

  • Auber D, Chiricota Y, Jourdan F, Melancon G (2003) Multiscale visualization of small-world networks. In: North SC, Munzner T (eds) Proceedings of IEEE information visualization symposium, Seattle, USA. IEEE Computer Press, San Francisco, pp 75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi A (2002) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner JC, Morris JS (2010) Myfacetube politics: social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Soc Sci Comp Rev 28:24–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven

  • Bennett L (2003) New media power: the Internet and global activism. In: Couldry N, Curran J (eds) Contesting media power: alternative media in a networked world. Rowman & Littlefield, Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI, Lafferty J (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei DM (2011) Introduction to probabilistic topic models. Comm ACM 55(4):77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Budak C, Agrawal D, El Abbadi A (2011) Structural trend analysis for online social networks. Technical Report UCSB/CS-2011-04, UCSB

  • Chadwick A (2006) Internet politics: states, citizens, and new communications technologies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Tang J, Li J, Zhou L (2009) Discovering the staring people from social networks. WWW’09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, pp 1219–1220

  • Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, Gonalves B, Flammini A, Menczer F (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on weblogs and social media

  • Creighton JL (2005) The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerfel M, Barnett G (1996) The use of Catpac for text analysis. Cult Anthropol Methods J 8(2):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Facebook (2011) Facebook Official Statistics. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics

  • Farrell H, Drezner D (2008) The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice 134(1):15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC, White DR, Romney AK (eds) (1989) Research methods in social network analysis. Transaction books, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney D (2010) Iran election: quantifying online activism. In: Proceedings of WebSci’10: extending the frontiers of society on-line. USA, Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F, Simonetto P, Zaidi F, Jourdan F, Bourqui R (2011) Communities and hierarchical structures in dynamic social networks: analysis and visualization. Soc Netw Anal Min 1:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8271–8276

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck J, Grimes JM, Rogers A (2010) Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. J Am Soc Inf Technol 61(8):1612–1621

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruhl D, Nagarajan M, Pieper J, Robson C, Sheth A (2010) Multimodal social intelligence in a real-time dashboard system. Int J Very Large Data Bases 19(6):825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker K, Coombs M, Weaver C, McCulloh G (2006) Possible uses of blogs and computer-mediated communication (CMC) for depolarizing political discourse. Paper presented to the Communication and Technology division (debate panel), Dresden, Germany

  • Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Bonus S, Wright E (2005) Weblogs as a bridging genre. Inform Technol People 18(2):142–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillard D, Purpura S, Wilkerson J (2007) An active learning framework for classifiying political text. In: Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago

  • Hofmann T (1999) Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval

  • Hong S, Nadler D (2011) Does the Early Bird Move the Polls? The use of the social media tool ‘Twitter’ by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Government Research

  • HuffPost Tech (2011) Twitter: we now have over 200 million accounts (update) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/28/twitter-number-of-users_n_855177.html

  • Ingenhoff D, Röttger U (2008) Issues management. Ein zentrales Verfahren der Unternehmenskommunikation. In: Schmidt B (ed) Unternehmenskommunikation. Kommunikationsmanagement aus der Sicht der Unternehmensführung, pp 323–354

  • Kalnis P, Mamoulis N, Bakiras S (2005) On discovering moving clusters in spatio-temporal data. In: SSTD, pp 364–381

  • Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpf D (2009) Blogosphere research: a mixed-methods approach to rapidly changing systems. IEEE Intell Syst 24(5):67–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasiviswanathan SP, Melville P, Banerjee A, Sindhwani V (2011) Emerging topic detection using dictionary learning. In: Proceedings of CIKM’11

  • Kavanaugh A, Fox EA, Sheetz S, Yang S, Li LT, Whalen T, Shoemaker D, Natsev P, Xie L (2011) Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, Maryland, 12–15 June, 2011

  • Kaye BK (2005) It’s a blog, blog, blog world. Atl J Commun 13(2):73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. The Sage Commtext Series. Sage Publications Ltd., London

  • Kushin M, Kitchener K (2009) Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday 14(11)

  • Larson K, Watson RT (2011) The value of social media: toward measuring social media strategies. In: Proceedings of ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China

  • Larsson A, Moe H (2011) Who tweets? Tracking microblogging use in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. In: ECIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 251

  • Lassen DS, Brown AR (2011) Twitter: The electoral connection? Soc Sci Comp Rev 29(4):419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leskovec J (2011) Social media analytics: tracking, modeling and predicting the flow of information through networks. In: Proceedings of WWW (Companion Volume) 2011, pp 277–278

  • Liu B (2010) Sentiment analysis: a multifaceted problem. IEEE Intell Syst 25:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2011) Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data. Springer, Heidelberg

  • Liu R, Guo W (2011) HMM-based state prediction for Internet hot topic. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE)

  • Mathioudakis M, Koudas N, Marbach P (2010) Early online identification of attention gathering items in social media. In: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, New York, 4–6 February, 2010, USA

  • McAfee A (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Rev 47(3):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna L (2007) “Getting the word out:” policy bloggers use their soap box to make change. Rev Policy Res 24(3):209–229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna L, Pole A (2007) What do bloggers do: an aver-age day on an average political blog. Public Choice 134(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe BL, Schrodt PA (2008) Introduction to the special issue: the statistical analysis of political text. Political Anal 16(4):351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson S, Resnick P (2011) The prevalence of political discourse in non-political blogs. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011)

  • Nagarajan M, Sheth A, Velmurugan S (2011) Citizen sensor data mining, social media analytics and development centric web applications. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on world wide web (WWW’11), pp 289–290

  • Newman ME, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69(2 Pt 2):026113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends Inf Retr 2(1–2):1–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris C, Wan S (2011) Listening to the community: social media monitoring tasks for improving government services. Proc Ext Abstr CHI ACM 2011:2095–2100

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu J, Sudharshan M, Saravanan M, Prasad G (2010) Augmenting rapid clustering method for social network analysis. Int Conf Adv Soc Netw Analysis Min 2010:407–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson SP, Vatrapu RK, Medina R (2010) Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Information Polity 15:11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero DM, Galuba W, Asur S, Huberman BA (2011) Influence and passivity in social media. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pp 113–114

  • Rosen D, Barnett G, Kim JH (2011) Social networks and online environments: when science and practice co-evolve. Soc Netw Analysis Min 1(1):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharkow M (2011) Thematic content analysis using supervised machine learning. An empirical evaluation using German online news. Quality Quantity (online first)

  • Schmidt J (2007) Blogging practices: an analytical framework. J Comput Mediat Commun 12(4):1409–1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J, Carrington PC (eds) (2011) Handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastiani F (2002) Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput Surv 34(1):1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz S, Kaufhold C (2011) Automatic full text analysis in public social media - adoption of a software prototype to investigate political communication. Procedia Comput Sci 5:776–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L, Brockmann T (2012) Usage of social media for political communication in Germany. In: Proceedings of PACIS 2012, forthcoming

  • Stone P, Dunphy D, Smith M, Ogilvie D (1966) The general inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C (2002) The law of group polarization. J Political Philos 10(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takacs G, Pilaszy I, Nemeth G, Tikk D (2007) On the gravity recommendation system. In: Proceeding of KDD cup and workshop

  • Tumasjan A, Sprenger T, Sandner P, Welpe L (2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Soc Sci Comput Rev 29(4):402–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz S (2009) The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 14:221–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Atteveldt W (2008) Semantic network analysis: techniques for extracting, representing, and querying media content. BookSurge Publishers, Charleston

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitak J, Zube P, Sfmock A, Caleb T, Ellison N, Lampe C (2011) It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 14(3):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick S, Mahon J (1994) Toward a substantive definition oft he corporate issue construct—a review and synthesis of the literature. Business Soc 33:293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wattal S, Schuff D, Mandviwalla M, Williams C (2010) Web 2.0 and politics: the 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Q 34(4):669–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigand RT, Wood JD, Mande DM (2010) Taming the social network jungle: from web 2.0 to social media. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Paper 416

  • Williams C, Gulati G (2007) Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 midterm elections. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association

  • Williams C, Gulati G (2009) Facebook grows up: an empirical assessment of its role in the 2008 congressional elections. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association

  • Wu F, Huberman B (2004) Social structure and opinion formation. HP Labs Research Paper, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardi S, Boyd D (2010) Dynamic debates: an analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bull Sci Technol Soc 20:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng J, Zhang S, Wu C, Xie J (2007) Predictive model for internet public opinion. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007)

  • Zeng D, Chen H, Lusch R, Li S (2010) Social media analytics and intelligence. IEEE Intell Syst 25(6):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Johnson TJ, Seltzer T, Bichard S (2010) The revolution will be networked: the influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Soc Sci Comput Rev 28:75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

    Stefan Stieglitz & Linh Dang-Xuan

Authors
  1. Stefan Stieglitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linh Dang-Xuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Stieglitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L. Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3, 1277–1291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation