Abstract
Identifying individuals with positive patient safety influence can be challenging and often involve time-consuming surveys. However, as healthcare systems increase their integration of health information technologies with clinical workflow, more social and behavioral data can be obtained automatically. Physician referrals, surgical team schedules, and medication double-check logs are examples of behavioral data that reflect a degree of individual choice, preference, and influence. In this paper, we explored data from medication double-check interactions in the context of nursing influence. Survey responses and double-check data from 86 nurses in three intensive care units were collected. There was on average 21.8% overlap between influence and double-check networks. Medication in-degree scores tended to correlate more with influence, especially when it came to trust proxies for two units (0.79 and 0.47). While results varied by unit and medication class, this work provides a lens for exploring influence on units using unobtrusive measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl J Med 357:370–379. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa066082
Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008) The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New Engl J Med 358(21):2249–2258. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
Easley D, Kleinberg J (2010) Networks, crowds and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Flin R, Winter J, Sarac C, Raduma M (2009) Human factors in patient safety: review of topics and tools. Report for methods and measures working group of WHO patient safety. World Health Organization, Geneva
Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O’Brien MA, Grimshaw J, Eccles MP (2010) Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000125.pub4.local
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 82(4):581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Harari GM, Lane ND, Wang R, Crosier BS, Campbell AT, Gosling SD (2016) Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspect Psychol Sci 11(6):838–854
Hethcote HW (2008) The mathematics of infectious diseases. Soc Ind Appl Math 42(4):599–653
Hewitt T, Chreim S, Forster A (2016) Double checking: a second look. J Eval Clin Pract 22(2):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12468
Hofmeyer AT (2013) How can a social capital framework guide managers to develop positive nurse relationships and patient outcomes? J Nurs Manag 21(5):782–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12128
Hoppe B, Reinelt C (2010) Draft submission to Leadership Quarterly, Elsevier Social Network Analysis and the Evaluation of Leadership Networks Draft submission to Leadership Quarterly, Elsevier. Leadersh Q 21(4):600–619
Huang DT, Clermont G, Kong LAN, Weissfeld LA, Sexton JB, Rowan KM, Angus DC (2010) Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study. Int J Qual Health Care 22(3):151–161
Kiss C, Bichler M (2008) Identification of influencers—measuring influence in customer networks. Decis Support Syst 46(1):233–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.007
Kwok N, Hanig S, Brown DJ, Shen W (2018) How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: a social network analysis. Leadersh Q 29(6):648–662
Neubert MJ, Taggar S (2004) Pathways to informal leadership: the moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadersh Q 15(2):175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.006
Panzarasa P, Opsahl T, Carley KM (2009) Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction: network analysis of an online community. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(5):911–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Roelens I, Baecke P, Benoit DF (2016) Identifying influencers in a social network: the value of real referral data. Decis Support Syst 91:25–36
Subramani MR, Rajagopalan B (2003) Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketing. Commun ACM 46(12):300–307. https://doi.org/10.1145/953460.953514
Uddin S, Thompson K, Schwendimann B, Piraveenan M (2014) The impact of study load on the dynamics of longitudinal email communications among students. Comput Educ 72:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.007
Ueno M (2004) Data mining and text mining technologies for collaborative learning in an ILMS “Samurai,” pp 4–5
Wasserman S, Faust K, Iacobucci D (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zeoli AM, Pizarro JM, Grady SC, Melde C (2014) Homicide as infectious disease: using public health methods to investigate the diffusion of homicide. Justice Q 31(3):609–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.732100
Zhou Y (2008) Mining organizational emails for social networks with application to Enron corpus. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy
Funding
This work was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation under Grant #72004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AF, EF, and SP were involved in the project formulation and data collection associated with this manuscript. AF and TK were involved in the data analysis associated with the manuscript. Each author was involved in the writing, editing and review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fong, A., Komolafe, T., Franklin, E. et al. Using medication administration and double-check data to infer social network influence in intensive care units. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 9, 26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0571-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0571-0