Abstract
Social networking service provider such as Twitter has become very popular communication tools for Internet and Mobile users. Our paper aims at participating into the topical debate if a tweet can shed light on future elections. After listening tweets collected during the Spanish 2019 presidential campaign between April 12 and April 26, we perform a statistical and computing analysis (based on R software) in order to reveal political discourse of the parties engaged and highlight the main messages conveyed and their resulted impact in the share of candidates’ voice. Our results show that Twitter information could be converted into a performant tool to organize digital department of the candidates helping to clarify the impact of their messages on the future voters. Our methodology is based on the use of different machine learning algorithms to clean and analyse 1.7 million of tweets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
https://elpais.com/politica/2019/04/20/actualidad/1555771219_600413.html-last access: 23/05/19.
https://www.elmundo.es/opinion/2019/03/26/5c9916a521efa051598b45be.html (last access: 25/5/2019).
References
Bhattacharya S, Yang C, Srinivasan P (2016) Perceptions of presidential candidates’ personalities in Twitter. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(2):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Blei DM (2012) Probablistic topic model. Commun ACM 55:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.938079
Bode L, Dalrymple KE (2016) Politics in 140 characters or less: campaign communication, network interaction, and political participation on Twitter. J Polit Mark 15(4):311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959686
Cerón-Guzmán JA, León-Guzmán E (2016) A sentiment analysis system of Spanish tweets and its application in Colombia 2014 presidential election. In: Proceedings—2016 IEEE international conferences on big data and cloud computing, BDCloud 2016, social computing and networking, SocialCom 2016 and sustainable computing and communications, SustainCom 2016, pp 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom.2016.47
Chakrabarti S, Dom B, Agrawal R, Raghavan P (1998) Scalable feature selection, classification and signature generation for organizing large text databases into hierarchical topic taxonomies. VLDB J 7(3):163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007780050061
DiFonzo N, Bordia P (2007) Psychological factors in rumor spread. In: DiFonzo N, Bordia P (eds) Rumor psychology: social and organizational approaches. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/11503-003
Feinerer I, Hornik K (2018) Text mining package. J Stat Softw 25(5):1–54. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=tm
Gayo-Avello D (2012) No, you cannot predict elections with twitter. IEEE Internet Comput 16(6):91–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2012.137
Gayo-Avello D (2013) A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Soc Sci Comput Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313493979
Gough HG, Heilbrun AB (1983) The adjective check list manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Sunnyvale. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?id=sRIRAQAAIAAJ
Hecht B, Hong L, Suh B, Chi EH (2011) Tweets from Justin Bieber’s heart. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI’11, p 237. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978976
Hermida A (2012) Tweets and truth: journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journal Pract 6(5–6):659–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269
Huberty M (2015) Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media. Int J Forecast 31(3):992–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.005
Jungherr A (2016) Twitter use in election campaigns: a systematic literature review. J Inf Technol Polit 13(1):72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
Jungherr A, Jürgens P, Schoen H (2012) Why the pirate party won the german election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: a response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. “predicting elections with twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment”. Soc Sci Comput Rev 30(2):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311404119
Koller D, Sahami M (1997) Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words. In: International conference on machine learning. Retrieved from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/291/1/1997-75.pdf
Kreiss D (2016) Seizing the moment: the presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media Soc 18(8):1473–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445
Le H, Boynton GR, Mejova Y, Shafiq Z, Srinivasan P (2017a) Bumps and bruises, pp 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078736
Le HT, Boynton GR, Mejova Y, Shafiq Z, Srinivasan P (2017b) Revisiting the American voter on Twitter, pp 4507–4519. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025543
Lewis DD, Yang YM, Rose TG, Li F (2004) RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J Mach Learn Res 5:361–397
Liu Y, Zhang L, Nie L, Yan Y, Rosenblum DS (2016) Fortune teller: predicting your career path. In: 30th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI 2016
Magalhães PC, Aguiar-Conraria L, Lewis-Beck MS (2012) Forecasting Spanish elections. Int J Forecast 28(4):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.04.007
Metaxas P, Gayo-Avello D (2011) How_(Not)_To_Predict_Elections.pdf. In: IEEE international conference on privacy, security and risk
Parmelee JH, Bichard SL (2013) Politics and the Twitter revolution: how tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lexington studies in political communication. Lexington, Lanham
Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Liu Y, Hopkins D, Ungar L (2017) Beyond binary labels: political ideology prediction of Twitter users. In: Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 729–740. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p17-1068
Shi L, Agarwal N, Agrawal A, Garg R, Spoelstra J (2012) Predicting US primary elections with Twitter. http://snap.stanford.edu/social2012/papers/shi.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 19
Shin J, Jian L, Driscoll K, Bar F (2017) Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: rumor diffusion and correction. New Media Soc 19(8):1214–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634054
Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L (2013) Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(4):1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
Tsakalidis A, Papadopoulos S, Cristea AI, Kompatsiaris Y (2015) Predicting elections for multiple countries using Twitter and polls. IEEE Intell Syst 30(2):10–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2015.17
Volkova S, Bachrach Y, Armstrong M, Sharma V (2015) Inferring latent user properties from texts published in social media. In: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), pp 4296–4297
Yang S, Zhang H (2018) Text mining of Twitter data using a latent Dirichlet allocation topic model and sentiment analysis. Int J Comput Inf Eng 12(7):525–529. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317350
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grimaldi, D. Can we analyse political discourse using Twitter? Evidence from Spanish 2019 presidential election. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 9, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0594-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0594-6