Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Elite versus mass polarization on the Brazilian impeachment proceedings of 2016

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political events are often topics of heated discussions around the globe, revealing opinion divergences of the population. These contrasting ideas characterize political polarization, which has been boosted by the popularization of Internet access and social media over the last few years. This work studies political polarization by developing computational methods to analyze online and offline data in the context of the 2016 impeachment proceedings of Dilma Rousseff in Brazil. We quantify the polarization among the Brazilian politicians at the House of Representatives (offline analysis) and among the Brazilian general public on Twitter (online analysis). We also looked at the popularity of politicians on Twitter and contrasted it with the polarization of the general public on this same media. Our results show that the politicians’ polarization increased after December of 2015, coinciding with the launch of the impeachment proceedings. The general public presented high values of polarization during the whole period, also revealing that the population was more polarized than its representatives. The politicians’ popularity analysis also shows that anti-impeachment politicians had a higher impact on the public opinion for the whole period of study than pro-impeachment politicians, which were popular only during a short but critical three months period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials (data transparency)

Twitter user ids can be made available under request. All other data sources are public and clearly indicated in the manuscript.

Notes

  1. Data is made available by Brazil’s House of Representatives through web services: http://www.camara.leg.br/SitCamaraWS/Proposicoes.asmx/ListarProposicoesVotadasEmPlenario (proposed bills) and http://www.camara.leg.br/SitCamaraWS/Proposicoes.asmx/ObterProposicaoPorID (votes).

  2. The complete interactive heat map can be seen on https://sites.google.com/view/robertacoeli/snam_2020/supertopics.

References

  • Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL (2008) Is polarization a myth? J Politics 70(2):542–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamic LA, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on link discovery, LinkKDD ’05. ACM Press, New York, pp 36–43

  • Badawy A, Addawood A, Lerman K, Ferrara E (2019) Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA influence campaign. Soc Netw Anal Min 9:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarri D, Gelman A (2008) Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Am J Sociol 114(2):408–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei DM, Lafferty JD (2006) Dynamic topic models. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning. ACM, New York, pp 113–120

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boutet A, Kim H, Yoneki E (2013) What’s in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now!. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(4):1379–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramson A, Grim P, Singer DJ, Fisher S, Berger W, Sack G, Flocken C (2016) Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures. J Math Sociol 40(2):80–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho CdS, França FO, Goya DH, Penteado CLP (2016) The people have spoken: conflicting Brazilian protests on twitter. In: Proceedings of HICSS

  • Conover M, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco MR, Gonçalves B, Menczer F, Flammini A (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM ’11, vol 133. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, pp 89–96

  • de França FO, Goya DH, de Camargo Penteado CL (2018) User profiling of the Twitter social network during the impeachment of Brazilian president. Soc Netw Anal Min 8(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Gollapudi S, Munagala K (2014) Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM ’14. ACM, New York, pp 403–412

  • Davidov D, Tsur O, Rappoport A (2010) Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics: posters. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 241–249

  • Davidson I, Gourru A, Velcin J, Wu Y (2020) Behavioral differences: insights, explanations and comparisons of French and us Twitter usage during elections. Soc Netw Anal Min 10(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P, Evans J, Bryson B (1996) Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Am J Sociol 102(3):690–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman JN, Peterson E, Slothuus R (2013) How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. Am Polit Sci Rev 107(1):57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell H (2012) The consequences of the Internet for politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 15:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell H, Drezner DW (2008) The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice 134(1–2):15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annu Rev Polit Sci 11(1):563–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garimella K, Morales GDF, Gionis A, Mathioudakis M (2018) Quantifying controversy on social media. ACM Trans Soc Comput 1(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra PHC, Meira W Jr, Cardie C, Kleinberg R (2013) A measure of polarization on social media networks based on community boundaries. In: Proceedings of the seventh international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM ’13. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp 1–10

  • IBOPE (2016) Internet e Política: Ativismo nas Redes Sociais. http://www.ibopeinteligencia.com/noticias-e-pesquisas/metade-dos-eleitores-brasileiros-receberam-informacoes-sobre-politica-pelo-facebook-twitter-ou-whatsapp. Accessed 15 Nov 2018

  • Ileri I, Karagoz P (2016) Detecting user emotions in Twitter through collective classification. In: Proceedings of the 8th international joint conference on knowledge discovery, vol 1. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Science and Technology Publications, pp 205–212

  • Jiang W, Wu J (2017) Active opinion-formation in online social networks. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8057103

  • Joseph K, Swire-Thompson B, Masuga H, Baum M, Lazer D (2019) Polarized, together: comparing partisan support For trump’s tweets using survey and platform-based measures. In: Proceedings of ICWSM

  • Kiritchenko S, Zhu X, Mohammad SM (2014) Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. J Artif Intell Res 50:723–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouloumpis E, Wilson T, Moore J (2011) Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the omg! In: Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM ’11. AAAI, pp 538–541

  • Lahuerta-Otero E, Cordero-Gutiérrez R, De la Prieta-Pintado F (2018) Retweet or like? That is the question. Online Information Review

  • Li J, Li X, Zhu B (2016) User opinion classification in social media: a global consistency maximization approach. Inf Manag 53(8):987–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietz H, Wagner C, Bleier A, Strohmaier M (2014) When politicians talk: assessing online conversational practices of political parties on twitter. In: Proceedings of the eighth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI, pp 285–294

  • Livne A, Simmons M, Adar E, Adamic L (2011) The party is over here: structure and content in the 2010 election. In: Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM ’11. AAAI, Barcelona, p SI

  • Makazhanov A, Rafiei D, Waqar M (2014) Predicting political preference of Twitter users. Soc Netw Anal Min 4(1):193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Q, Zhai C (2005) Discovering evolutionary theme patterns from text: an exploration of temporal text mining. In: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining. ACM, pp 198–207

  • Metaxas P, Mustafaraj E, Wong K, Zeng L, O’Keefe M, Finn S (2015) What do retweets indicate? Results from user survey and meta-review of research. In: Proceedings of ICWSM

  • Missen MMS, Boughanem M, Cabanac G (2013) Opinion mining: reviewed from word to document level. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad SM (2012) #emotional tweets. In: Proceedings of the first joint conference on lexical and computational semantics, SemEval ’12. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 246–255

  • Mohammad SM, Sobhani P, Kiritchenko S (2017) Stance and sentiment in tweets. ACM Trans Internet Technol 17(3):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales AJ, Borondo J, Losada JC, Benito RM (2015) Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 25(3):033114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(23):8577–8582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor B, Balasubramanyan R, Routledge BR, Smith NA, et al. (2010) From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI, pp 122–129

  • Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends Inf Retrieval 2(1–2):1–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabelo JCB, Prudencio RBC, Barros FA (2012) Using link structure to infer opinions in social networks. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp 681–685

  • Ribeiro VA, Gomes Goveia F (2016) A Comissão do Impeachment na Rede: o Histórico das Narrativas Políticas Sobre o Impedimento de Dilma Rousseff no Twitter. In: Anais do XVIII Congresso de Ciências da Comunicação na Região Nordeste, Intercom – Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Interdisciplinares da Comunicação, p S.I

  • Ruediger MA, Martins R, da Luz M, Grassi A (2014) Ação coletiva e polarização na sociedade em rede para uma teoria do conflito no brasil contemporâneo. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia 2(4):205–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (2016) How to measure ideological polarization in party systems. In: ECPR Graduate Student Conference, University of Tartu, p SI

  • Stilo G, Velardi P (2016) Efficient temporal mining of micro-blog texts and its application to event discovery. Data Min Knowl Discov 30(2):372–402

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein CR (2002) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hoffmann P (2005) Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 347–354

  • Yan X, Guo J, Lan Y, Cheng X (2013) A biterm topic model for short texts. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’13. ACM Press, Rio de Janeiro, pp 1445–1456

  • Zhang L, Peng TQ, Zhang YP, Wang XH, Zhu JJ (2014) Content or context: Which matters more in information processing on microblogging sites. Comput Hum Behav 31:242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Chen X, Chen Y, Wang S, Li Z, Xia J (2015) Event detection and popularity prediction in microblogging. Neurocomputing 149:1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Gisele L. Pappa and Pedro O.S. Vaz-de-Melo were funded by CNPq—the Brazilian Research Council—and FAPEMIG—the Research Council of the State of Minas Gerais.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Roberta C. N. Moreira, Pedro O. S. Vaz-de-Melo & Gisele L. Pappa

Authors
  1. Roberta C. N. Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro O. S. Vaz-de-Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gisele L. Pappa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisele L. Pappa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable

Code availability (software application or custom code)

Available on request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreira, R.C.N., Vaz-de-Melo, P.O.S. & Pappa, G.L. Elite versus mass polarization on the Brazilian impeachment proceedings of 2016. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 10, 92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00706-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00706-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation