Abstract
Currently, online social networks (OSN) have become active collaborative learning and a popular e-learning platform for sharing knowledge. Informal learning is any form of learning that occurs outside the formal curricula of higher educational institutes. There is plenty of studies on the use of OSN for formal learning; however, the use of OSN for informal learning particularly by academic researchers got limited attention. This study attempts to fill this gap in the literature. This research aims to examine the factors which motivate academic researchers to accept OSN as a platform for informal learning. Also, a technology, interactivity, individuality, and behavior (TIIB) model is proposed based on feedback from academic researchers from research universities. To achieve this aim, a quantitative study based on the theory of constructivism and technology acceptance model 3 (TAM3) is done. With 786 valid questionnaires received, the proposed model is tested and statistically evaluated using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) technique. The study results showed that collaborative, interactive, communication, quality of information, and subjective norms are the major factors of the behavioral intention of academic researchers to use OSN for informal learning. The study suggests instructional recommendations containing important technological, individual, and interactive features that could be considered by practitioners to encourage the acceptance of OSN for informal learning. The results of this research guide OSN for informal learning education providers in terms of developing an effective platform for academic researchers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alshibly HH (2014) A free simulation experiment to examine the effects of social commerce website quality and customer psychological empowerment on customers satisfaction. J Bus Stud Q 5(4):21–40
Alsabawy AY, Cater-Steel A, Soar J (2013) IT infrastructure services as a requirement for e-learning system success. Comput Educ 69:431–451
Al-Hojailan MIA (2013) The effectiveness of the social network in higher education in Saudi Arabia: action research to develop an e-learning conceptual model based on blog tools. PhD thesis. De Montfort University, UK
Al-Sabaawi MYM, Dahlan HM (2018) Acceptance model of social media for informal learning. In: Saeed F, Gazem N, Patnaik S, Saed BA, Mohammed F (eds) Recent trends in information and communication technology. IRICT 2017. Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies, vol 5. Springer, Cham
Al-Sabaawi MYM, Dahlan HM (2019) Social media for informal learning usage in Malaysia: barriers and benefits. In: Saeed F, Gazem N, Mohammed F, Busalim A (eds) Recent trends in data science and soft computing. IRICT 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 843. Springer, Cham
Al-Sabaawi, MYM, Dahlan HM, Shehzad HMF (2021) Social media usage for informal learning in Malaysia: academic researcher perspective. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ 17(2):103–117
Alloway TP, Alloway RG (2012) The impact of engagement with social networking sites (SNSs) on cognitive skills. Comput Hum Behav 28(5):1748–1754
Balakrishnan V (2017) Key determinants for intention to use social media for learning in higher education institutions. Univ Access Inf Soc 16(2):289–301
Balakrishnan V, Gan CL (2016) Mobile technology and interactive lectures: the key adoption factors. In: Churchill D, Lu J, Chiu T, Fox B (eds) Mobile learning design. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0027-0_7
Balakrishnan V, Liew TK, Pourgholaminejad S (2015) Fun learning with Edooware—a social media enabled tool. Comput Educ 80:39–47
Bosch TE (2009) Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Commun South Afr J Commun Theory Res 35(2):185–200
Brown SA (2012) Seeing Web 20 in context: a study of academic perceptions. Internet High Educ 15(1):50–57
Brown SA, Dennis AR, Venkatesh V (2010) Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. J Manag Inf Syst 27(2):9–54
Bullinger A, Renken U, Moslein K (2011) Understanding online collaboration technology adoption by researchers – a model and empirical study. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings, vol 2. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/2
Burbules NC (2016) How we use and are used by social media in education. Educ Theory 66(4):551–565
Cheung CM, Chiu PY, Lee MK (2011) Online social networks: why do students use Facebook? Comput Hum Behav 27(4):1337–1343
Chen B, Bryer T (2012) Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 13(1):87–104
Chin W (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336
Clough G (2010) Geolearners: location-based informal learning with mobile and social technologies. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 3(1):33–44
Cross J (2011) Informal learning: Rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. Wiley
Curran JM, Lennon R (2011) participating in the conversation: exploring usage of social media networking sites. Acad Market Stud J 15:21
Dabbagh N, Reo R (2011) Back to the future: tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. In: Lee MJW, McLoughlin C (eds) Web 2.0-based e-learning: applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 1–20
Dumpit DZ, Fernandez CJ (2017) Analysis of the use of social media in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance Model. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 14(1):5
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Faqih KM, Jaradat MIRM (2015) Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. J Retail Consum Serv 22:37–52
Franz AK (2011) Organic chemistry YouTube writing assignment for large lecture classes. J Chem Educ 89(4):497–501
Gruzd A, Staves K, Wilk A (2012) Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Comput Hum Behav 28(6):2340–2350
Greenhow C, Lewin C (2016) Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learn Media Technol 41(1):6–30
Gu F, Widén-Wulff G (2011) Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: a Finnish case study. Electron Libr 29(6):762–776
Huang RT, Hsiao CH, Tang TW, Lien TC (2014) Exploring the moderating role of perceived flexibility advantages in mobile learning continuance intention (MLCI). Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 15(3):140–157
Hsieh HL, Kuo YM, Wang SR, Chuang BK, Tsai CH (2016) A study of personal health record user’s behavioral model based on the PMT and UTAUT integrative perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):8
Islam R, Rabbi F (2016) Researching students’ experience of social media use as an informal learning platform. In: International conference on teaching and learning (ICTL), p 469. http://dir.iub.edu.bd/handle/123456789/219
Jaffar AA (2012) YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5(3):158–164
Kjellberg S (2010) I am a blogging researcher: motivations for blogging in a scholarly context. First Monday 15(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i8.2962
Krauskopf K, Zahn C, Hesse FW (2012) Leveraging the affordances of Youtube: the role of pedagogical knowledge and mental models of technology functions for lesson planning with technology. Comput Educ 58(4):1194–1206
Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC (2010) Facebook® and academic performance. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1237–1245
Lei CU, Krilavičius T, Zhang N, Wan K, Man KL (2012) Using Web 2.0 tools to enhance learning in higher education: a case study in technological education. Proc Int Multiconf Eng Comput Sci 2:1153–1156
Lim JS, Al-Aali A, Heinrichs JH, Lim KS (2013) Testing alternative models of individuals’ social media involvement and satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav 29(6):2816–2828
Lipsett A (2008) McDonald’s A—level ‘tough course’, says Brown’. Guardian 28. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2008/jan/28/alevels.secondaryschools
Lupton D (2014) ‘Feeling better connected’: academics’ use of social media. News and Media Research Centre, University of Canberra, Canberra
Madjar N, Cohen-Malayev M (2013) Youth movements as educational settings promoting personal development: comparing motivation and identity formation in formal and non-formal education contexts. Int J Educ Res 62:162–174
Manasijević D, Živković D, Arsić S, Milošević I (2016) Exploring students’ purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 60:441–450
Merriam SB, Caffarella RS, Baumgartner LM (2012) Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide. Wiley
Misko J (2008) Combining formal, non-formal and informal learning for workforce skill development. National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd, Adelaide
Moghavvemi S, Paramanathan T, Rahin NM, Sharabati M (2017) Student’s perceptions towards using e-learning via Facebook. Behav Inf Technol 36(10):1081–1100
Mohammadi H (2015) Factors affecting the e-learning outcomes: an integration of TAM and IS success model (Retration of vol 32, pg 701 2015). Telemat Inform 32(4):R1–R1
Moran M, Seaman J, Tinti-Kane H (2012) Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: how today’s higher education faculty use social media. Pearson Learning Solutions, Boston
Oh JS, Jeng W (2011) Groups in academic social networking services: an exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary collaboration. In: 2011 IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing, pp. 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.202
Roblyer D, McDaniel M, Webb M, Herman J, Witty V (2010) Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet High Educ 13(3):134–140
Romi S, Schmida M (2009) Non-formal education: a major educational force in the postmodern era. Camb J Educ 39(2):257–273
Sarwar B, Zulfiqar S, Aziz S, Ejaz Chandia K (2018) Usage of social media tools for collaborative learning: the effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberbullying. J Educ Comput Res 57(1):246–279
Sánchez RA, Cortijo V, Javed U (2014) Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Comput Educ 70:138–149
Sekaran U, Bougie R (2016) Research methods for business: a skill building approach, 7th edn. Wiley
Selwyn N (2007) Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-a critical review. In: Paper for CERI-KERIS international expert meeting on ICT and educational performance. vol 16. p 17
Sharma SK, Joshi A, Sharma H (2016) A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Comput Hum Behav 55:340–353
Shehzad HMF, Ibrahim RB, Yusof AF, Khaidzir KAM, Iqbal M, Razzaq S (2021) Comput Ind 129:103444
Shoshani Y, Braun Hazi R (2007) The use of the Internet environment for enhancing creativity. Educ Media Int 44(1):17–32
Shohel MMC (2016) Informal learning in Bangladesh: contexts, challenges and prospects. In: Burger T (ed) Handbook for informal learning—interdisciplinary and international perspectives [German Title: Handbuck informelles Lernen]. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim, pp 277–288
Song D, Bonk CJ (2016) Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Educ 3(1):1205838
Smaller H (2005) Teacher informal learning and teacher knowledge: theory, practice and policy. In: Bascia N, Cumming A, Datnow A, Leithwood K, Livingstone D (eds) International Handbook of Educational Policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_27
Šumak B, HeričKo M, Pušnik M (2011) A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology types. Comput Hum Behav 27(6):2067–2077
Tajudeen FP, Jaafar NI, Ainin S (2018) Understanding the impact of social media usage among organizations. Inf Manag 55(3):308–321
Thongmak M (2014) Factors determining learners’ acceptance of Facebook in a higher education classroom. Knowl Manag E-Learn: Int J (KM&EL) 6(3):316–331
Tseng SM (2015) Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service. J Retail Consum Serv 24:85–93
Tripathi S (2014) Factors influencing the technology acceptance of social media in India: a literature Review and research agenda for future. J Adv Comput Sci Inf Technol (ACSIT) 1(2):43–47
Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 6(2):144–176
Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q 28(4):695–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
Van Noy M, James H, Bedley C (2016) Reconceptualizing Learning: a review of the literature on informal learning. ACT Foundation. Rutgers Education and Employment Research Center
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. J Deci Sci 39(2):273–315
Venkatesh V, Morris G, Davis B, Davis D (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204
Vijayasarathy LR (2004) Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inf Manag 41(6):747–762
Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Umrani-Khan F, Iyer S (2009) ELAM: a model for acceptance and use of e-learning by teachers and students. In: Proceedings of the international conference on e-learning. Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, pp 475–485
Wamba SF, Bhattacharya M, Trinchera L, Ngai EW (2017) Role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in user social media acceptance within workspace: assessing unobserved heterogeneity. Int J Inf Manage 37(2):1–13
Wiid J, Cant MC, Nell C (2013) Open distance learning students’ Perception of the use of social media networking systems as an educational tool. Int Bus Econ Res J (online) 12(8):867
Whitty C, Anane R (2014) Social network enhancement for non-formal learning. In: 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). IEEE, pp 1645–1654. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.210
Zhao F, Kemp LJ (2012) Integrating Web 2.0-based informal learning with workplace training. Educ Media Int 49(3):231–245
Zhou Q, Lee CS, Sin SCJ (2017) Using social media in formal learning: investigating learning strategies and satisfaction. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol 54(1):472–482
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the University of Mosul/College of Administration & Economics for their provided facilities, which help to improve the quality of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Construct | |
---|---|
No. | Measurement items |
Perceived usefulness | |
1 | Using social media for informal learning improves my performance in my research activities |
2 | Using social media for informal learning increases my productivity in performing my research activities |
3 | Using social media for informal learning enhances my effectiveness in my research activities |
4 | I find social media for informal learning to be useful in my research activities |
Perceived ease of use | |
5 | It is easy to use social media to find research materials |
6 | It is easy to find people with common interests in social media |
7 | I do not have any problem to learn about social media sites’ features |
8 | Generally, I find it very easy to use social media |
Perceived flexibility | |
9 | Social media enable me to carry out my research activity at any time from any place |
10 | Social media enable me to access more research material conveniently |
11 | Social media support my research activity |
12 | Social media allow me to interact with other researchers flexibly |
Facilitating conditions | |
13 | The availability of WiFi enables me to use social media for informal learning easily |
14 | I have the time to use social media for informal learning in my research activity |
15 | My organization provides me with the needed knowledge to use social media for informal learning |
16 | Assistance to use social media for informal learning is available at my institution |
Subjective | |
17 | Most of my colleagues believe that using social media to share ideas will enhance our research output |
18 | Most of my colleagues believe that using social media shows that one is open to new ideas |
19 | Most researchers who are close to me expect me to interact with them on social media |
20 | Most researchers who are close to me expect me to use social media for informal learning |
Self-efficacy | |
21 | I have the skill to use social media for informal learning |
22 | I have the confidence in using social media for informal learning |
23 | I have enough knowledge/experience to use social media for informal learning |
24 | I can quickly figure out how to use social media for informal learning |
Perceived enjoyment | |
25 | I usually find sharing my knowledge about my research through social media to be enjoyable |
26 | Sharing my knowledge and information about my research through social media in the group is pleasant |
27 | I have fun sharing my knowledge and information about my research through social media |
28 | I feel excited while exploring more information about my research using social media |
Information quality | |
29 | Social media provide content that is easy to understand |
30 | Social media provide up to date content and information about my research |
31 | Social media provide the required content and information about my research |
32 | The information provided in social media is clear and unambiguous |
Communication | |
33 | I use social media to communicate with researchers globally |
34 | I use social media to communicate with my research partners |
35 | I use social media to communicate with experts in my research field |
36 | I use social media to communicate with other researchers in my research field to keep up to date |
Interactive | |
37 | I use social media to facilitate interaction with my research partners |
38 | I use social media to exchange knowledge more quickly with other researchers |
39 | I use social media to share my research knowledge with other researchers |
40 | I use social media to get feedback about my research from other researchers |
Collaborative | |
41 | I use social media to discuss my research method with other researchers |
42 | I use social media to discuss my research finding with other researchers |
43 | I use social media to facilitate collaboration with my research partner |
44 | I use social media to facilitate collaboration with my research respondents to collect the required data |
Behavioral intention | |
45 | I intend to use social media for informal learning in my research activities |
46 | I predict I would use social media for informal learning in my research activities |
47 | I plan to use social media for informal learning in my research activities |
48 | I intend to keep using social media for informal learning for my research activities |
Use behavior | |
49 | I use social media for informal learning in my daily research activities |
50 | I intensively use social media for informal learning in my research activities |
51 | I frequently use social media for informal learning in my research activities |
52 | I spend an average of 6 h per week using social media for informal learning in my research activities |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Sabaawi, M.Y.M., Dahlan, H.M., Shehzad, H.M.F. et al. A model of influencing factors of online social networks for informal learning in research institutes. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00773-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00773-9