Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semi-supervised domain adaptation for pedestrian detection in video surveillance based on maximum independence assumption

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, two domain adaptation approaches are utilized in a pedestrian detection application that is one of the most interesting and widely used fields in machine vision. In cases where the distributions of training and test data are different, the performance of pedestrian detection algorithms drops significantly. In this paper, employing two methods, namely transfer component analysis (TCA) and maximum independence domain adaptation (MIDA), the source and target domain data are represented in a new space where the distributions of two domains are more similar to each other, while the local geometry of data is preserved. Thereby, the classifier trained in the original space can be applied to the target data after the transformation. The experimental results of the proposed approach obtained on INRIA train dataset and CUHK test dataset show 82% about relative reduction in the classification error in the case of using TCA and about 84% in the case of using MIDA, compared to the baseline method where no domain adaptation method has been applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun D, Watada J (2015) Detecting pedestrians and vehicles in traffic scene based on boosted HOG features and SVM. In: IEEE 9th International symposium on intelligent signal processing, WISP, pp 1–4

  2. Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, vol 1, pp 886–893

  3. Felzenszwalb PF, Girshick RB, McAllester D (2010) Cascade object detection with deformable part models. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, pp 2241–2248

  4. Dollár P, Tu Z, Perona, P et al (2009) Integral channel features. BMVC http://authors.library.caltech.edu

  5. Felzenszwalb P, McAllester D, Ramanan D (2008) A discriminatively trained, multiscale deformable part model. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 1–8

  6. Dollár P, Belongie SJ, Perona P (2010) The fastest pedestrian detector in the west. In: Proceedings of the British machine vision conference, pp 68.1–68.11

  7. Dollár P, Appel R, Belongie S et al (2014) Fast feature pyramids for object detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(8):1532–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenberg C, Hebert M, Schneiderman H (2005) Semi-supervised self-training of object detection models. WACV/MOTION, (2)

  9. Levin A, Viola PA, Freund Y (2003) Unsupervised improvement of visual detectors using co-training. In: IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol 1, pp 626–633

  10. Javed O, Ali S, Shah M (2005) Online detection and classification of moving objects using progressively improving detectors. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, vol 1, pp 696–701

  11. Yang J, Yan R, Hauptmann AG (2007) Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive SVMs. In: Proceedings of 15th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp 188–197

  12. Qi GJ, Aggarwal C, Huang T (2011) Towards semantic knowledge propagation from text corpus to web images. In: Proceedings of conference world wide web, pp 297–306

  13. Duan L, Tsang IW, Xu D et al (2009) Domain transfer SVM for video concept detection. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1375–1381

  14. Pang J, Huang Q, Yan S et al (2011) Transferring boosted detectors towards viewpoint and scene adaptiveness. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(5):1388–1400

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Roth PM, Sternig S, Grabner H et al (2009) Classifier grids for robust adaptive object detection. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, IEEE Conference pp 2727–2734

  16. Roth PM, Grabner H, Bischof H, et al (2005) On-line conservative learning for person detection. IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance: 223-230

  17. All K, Hasler D, Fleuret F (2011) Flow boost appearance learning from sparsely annotated video. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, pp 1433–1440

  18. Jain V, Learned-Miller E (2011) Online domain adaptation of a pre-trained cascade of classifiers. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, pp 577–584

  19. Rosenberg C, Hebert M, Schneiderman H (2005) Semi-supervised self-training of object detection models. In: 7th IEEE workshops on applications of computer vision (WACV/MOTION’05),vol 1, pp 29–36

  20. Levin A, Viola PA, Freund Y (2003) Unsupervised improvement of visual detectors using co-training. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international conference on computer vision, vol 1, pp 626–633

  21. Wu B, Nevatia R (2007) Improving part based object detection by unsupervised, online boosting. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–8

  22. Wang X, Wang M, Li W (2014) Scene-specific pedestrian detection for static video surveillance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(2):361–374

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Mao Y, Yin Z (2015) Training a scene-specific pedestrian detector using tracklets. In: IEEE winter conference on computer vision (WACV), pp 170–176

  24. Maâmatou H, Chateau T, Gazzah S et al (2016) Sequential Monte Carlo filter based on multiple strategies for a scene specialization classifier. EURASIP J Image Video Process 1:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan SJ, Tsang IW, Kwok JT et al (2011) Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(2):199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi Y, Sha F (2012) Information-theoretical learning of discriminative clusters for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on machine learning, pp 1275–1282

  27. Shao M, Kit D, Fu Y (2014) Generalized transfer subspace learning through low-rank constraint. Int J Comput Vision 109(1–2):74–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan SJ, Kwok JT, Yang Q (2008) Transfer learning via dimensionality reduction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 677–682

  29. Lanckriet GR, Cristianini N, Bartlett P et al (2004) Learning the kernel matrix with semidefinite programming. Mach Learn Res 5:27–72

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Song L, Smola A, Gretton A, Bedo J et al (2012) Feature selection via dependence maximization. Mach Learn Res 13:1393–1434

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Gretton A, Bousquet O, Smola A, et al (2005) Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms. In: Conference algorithmic learning theory, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–77

  32. Yan K, Kou L, Zhang D (2018) Learning domain-invariant subspace using domain features and independence maximization. IEEE Trans Cybern 48(1):288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schölkopf B, Smola A, Müller KR (1998) Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput 10(5):1299–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Horn BK, Schunck BG (1981) Determining optical flow. Artif Intell 17(1–3):185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Beauchemin SS, Barron JL (1995) The computation of optical flow. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 27(3):433–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Ghazaleh Shojaei & Farbod Razzazi

Authors
  1. Ghazaleh Shojaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farbod Razzazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farbod Razzazi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shojaei, G., Razzazi, F. Semi-supervised domain adaptation for pedestrian detection in video surveillance based on maximum independence assumption. Int J Multimed Info Retr 8, 241–252 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-019-00180-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-019-00180-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation