Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of Quality in Public Transport Services: The Use of Quality Dimensions as an Input for Fuzzy TOPSIS

International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of the quality of service provided by organizations plays a key role in the continuous improvement of the quality management system. When it comes to the quality of public transportation, the theme becomes even more relevant since user satisfaction influences the perception of a better quality of life. One of the modes of public transport that stands out in Brazil is the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system, characterized by fast passenger transportation since it uses exclusive runways and promotes faster locomotion and less pollution of gases. In the Northeast region of Brazil, the current system has operated since 2014 with two large corridors with a length of 25 km and carrying more than 830 thousand people daily. Due to the importance of the fast passenger transport sector, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of the service provided. In this sense, the present work proposes an approach to evaluate the public transport services offered to users of the BRT system in the northeast of Brazil, through a structured questionnaire to measure customer perception and applying the Fuzzy Set and Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The motivation for choosing the Fuzzy Set is based on the data processing mode since fuzzy numbers simplify the expression of human judgment rather than its individual rationality, the translation of individual subjectivity, and data processing. The choice of TOPSIS for the possibility of ordering variables by means of comparison with the perfect alternative. The methodology of this article is considered a case study and 569 questionnaires were applied to BRT users. The result of the application of the approach showed that the best-evaluated variables are technical security and a single charge of the collection. On the other hand, there was a shortage of information about the schedules of the lines and the presence of convenience stores, demonstrating that these aspects can be developed for greater user satisfaction. It is believed that the proposed approach can contribute to the organizational context by guiding managers and establishing a logical set of procedures for assessing service delivery situations, revealing the level of adjustment required to achieve optimal service performance, and variables and quality dimensions by the best performance score according to the customer’s perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertini, R.L.: You are the traffic jam: an examination of congestion measures. In: 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2005)

  2. Ploeg, F.V.D., Poelhekke, S.: Globalization and the Rise of Mega Cities in the Developing World. Cesifo Working Paper No 2208, Category Trade Policy (2008)

  3. Rufolo, M., Bianco, M.J.: The Impact of Congestion Pricing and Parking Taxes on Spatial Competition. School of Urban Studies and Planning Portland State University, Portland (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Cecín, P.: Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transp. Policy 17(6), 388–397 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, T., Nelson, J.D.: Bus Rapid Transit implementation in Beijing: an evaluation of performance and impacts. Res. Transp. Econ. 39(1), 108–113 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, V.S., Kumar, V.R., Rao, M.K.: Preliminary assessment of bus rapid transit system for urban roads. Int. J. Technol. Res. Eng. 4(3), 439–443 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cervero, R., Dai, D.: BRT TOD: leveraging transit oriented development with bus rapid transit investments. Transp. Policy 36(11), 127–138 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weisbrod, G., Mulley, C., Hensher, D.: Recognising the complementary contributions of cost benefit analysis and economic impact analysis to an understanding of the worth of public transport investment: a case study of bus rapid transit in Sydney, Australia. Res. Transp. Econ. 59(1), 450–461 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., Rutherford, S., Smith, R.L., Cracknell, J., Soberman, E.R.: Bus Rapid Transit, Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program: Report 90. Transportation Research Board, Washington (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright, L., Hook, W.: Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy. http://www.itdp.org/index.php/microsite/brt_planning_guide/. Accessed 26 Jan 2017 (2007)

  11. BRTDATA.ORG: Global BRT data. http://brtdata.org/?lang=pt. Accessed 5 Feb 2017 (2017)

  12. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. Part F 14, 167–175 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: Structural equation modelling for analysing passengers’ perceptions about railway services. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 54(4), 96–106 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. J. Public Transp. 10(3), 21–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou, P.F., Lu, C.S., Chang, Y.H.: Effects of service quality and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty in high-speed rail services in Taiwan. Transp. A Transport Sci. 10(10), 917–945 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stradling, S., Carreno, M., Rye, T., Noble, A.: Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transp. Policy 14(4), 283–292 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Şimşekoğlu, Ö., Nordfjærn, T., Rundmo, T.: The role of attitudes, transport priorities, and car use habit for travel mode use and intentions to use public transportation in an urban Norwegian public. Transp. Policy 42(8), 113–120 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yaya, L.H.P., Fortià, M.F., Canals, C.S., Marimon, F.: Service quality assessment of public transport and the implication role of demographic characteristics. Public Transport 7(3), 1–20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morton, C., Caulfield, B., Anable, J.: Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case Stud. Transport Policy 4(3), 199–207 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A conceptual model of services quality and its implication for future research. J. Market. 49(4), 41–50 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liou, T.S., Chen, C.W.: Subjective appraisal of service quality using fuzzy linguistic assessment. Int. J. Quality Reliab. Manag. 23, 928–943 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Batista, D.A., Medeiros, D.D.: Assessment of quality services through linguistic variables. Benchmarking Int. J. 21(1), 28–45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gouvello: Brazil Low-carbon Country Case Study. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BRAZILEXTN/Resources/Brazil_LowcarbonStudy.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2017 (2010)

  24. Brazil: BRT Manual - Planning Guide. http://www.cidades.gov.br/images/stories/ArquivosSEMOB/Biblioteca/ManualBRT.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017 (2008)

  25. Prates, M.: Five Cities Where Buses Work. http://exame.abril.com.br/brasil/5-cidades-pioneiras-no-uso-eficiente-do-onibus/. Accessed 26 Jan 2017 (2016)

  26. Grande Recife Consórcio de Transporte: BRT Via Livre. http://www.granderecife.pe.gov.br/web/grande-recife/brt-via-livre. Accessed 23 Jan 2017 (2015)

  27. Ferraz, N.A., Melo, F.J.C., Jerônimo, T.B., Albuquerque, A.P.G., Medeiros, D.D.: Evaluation of quality in services: real case in the hotel fitness center. Braz. J. Tour. Res. 12(1), 1–27 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Santos, R.R., Melo, F.J.C., Claudino, C.N.Q., Medeiros, D.D.: Model for formulating competitive strategy: the supplementary health sector case. Benchmarking Int. J. 24(1), 219–243 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eboli, L., Mazzula, G.: A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transp. Policy 18(1), 172–181 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cronin, J.J., Taylor, S.: Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J. Market. 56(3), 55–68 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bolton, R.N., Drew, J.H.: A multistage modelo f customers assessment of service quality and value. J. Consum. Res. 17(4), 375–384 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oña, J., Oña, R.: Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: a review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transp. Sci. 1(1), 1–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oña, J., Oña, R., López, G.: Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: a step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation. Transportation 43(5), 725–747 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Findlay, P., Kalleberg, A.L., Warhurst, C.: Job types and job quality. Eur. Hum. Relat. 66(4), 475–502 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freitas, L.P.: Assessing the quality of intercity Road transportation of passengers: an exploratory study in Brazil. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 49(3), 379–392 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bian, J.W., Ding, M.: The effectiveness of the construction of the bus rapid transit in Xiamen City. In: Mackett, R.L., May, A.D., Kii, M., Pan, H. (eds.) Sustainable Transport for Chinese Cities, Transport and Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 255–275. Emerald Group Publishing, Portland (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva, C.F.D., Batista, D.A., Medeiros, D.D.: A proposed method to evaluate the quality of services using fuzzy sets theory. Qual. Quant. 48(2), 871–885 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zadeh, L.A.: Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic. In: Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems, pp. 2–25. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu, M.C., Keng, I., Chen, H.X.: Measuring service quality via a fuzzy analytical approach. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(2), 292–302 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu, W.: A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making system for analyzing gaps of service quality. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(2), 256–267 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tooranloo, H.S., Ayatollah, A.S.: Pathology the internet banking service quality using failure mode and effect analysis in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(1), 109–123 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mishra, A.R., Jain, D., Hooda, D.S.: Exponential intuitionistic fuzzy information measure with assessment of service quality. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 788–798 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, H., Fan, Z.P., Liu, Y., Peng, W.L., Yu, Y.Y.: A method for evaluating service quality with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(5), 1523–1538 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application. Springer, New York (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, Y.J., Lee, H.S.: Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl. 53(11), 1762–1772 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Celik, E., Bilisik, O.N., Erdogan, M., Gumus, A.T., Baracli, H.: An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp. Res. Part E 58(11), 28–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Massami, E.P., Myamba, B.M., Edward, L.: Fuzzy analysis and evaluation of public transport service quality: a case study of dar es Salaam City, Tanzania. J. Transp. Technol. 6(6), 297–311 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Forza, C.: Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22(2), 152–194 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Faleiros, F., Käppler, C., Pontes, F.A.R., Silva, S.S.C., Goes, F.S.N., Cucick, C.D.: Use of virtual questionnaire and dissemination as a data collection strategy in scientific studies. Texto Contexto Enferm. 25(4), 1–6 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hair, J.F.J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Likert, R.A.: Technique for measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140(1), 5–55 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mahmoud, M., Hine, J.: Using AHP to measure the perception gap between current and potential users of bus services. Transp. Plan. Technol. 36(1), 4–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Oña, J., Oña, R., Calvo, F.J.: A classification tree approach to identify key factors os transit service quality. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(12), 11164–11171 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Oña, J., Oña, R., Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp. Policy 29(9), 219–226 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Antunes, E.M., Simões, F.A.: Use of psychometrics to evaluate the quality of transport service: a case study. J. Gestão Ind. 09(2), 416–439 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nosal, K., Solecka, K.: Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban public transport. Transp. Res. Proc. 3(1), 269–278 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Foundation for Science and Technology of Pernambuco (FACEPE), Brazilian governmental entities that promote scientific and technological development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joás Tomaz de Aquino.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

1.1 Questionnaire for Quality Assessment

Part 1: Information about you.

  1. a)

    Age

  2. b)

    Sex

  3. c)

    City where you live

  4. d)

    Neighborhood in which you live

  5. e)

    Occupation

  6. f)

    BRT line used

  7. g)

    How many times a week is the BRT line used?

Part 2: The following set of statements refers to YOUR PERCEPTION OF THE SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE BRT SYSTEM.

V01. The trips were fulfilled in the schedules;

V02. The stopping points had line schedules;

V03. The buses were driven safely;

V04. The buses were new and comfortable;

V05. The buses made little noise;

V06. The buses had air-conditioning working properly;

V07. The stopping points were comfortable;

V08. There was a one-way charge for the integrated transport service;

V09. There was the facility to park near the stopping points;

V10. There was free internet in the vehicles and stopping point;

V11. There were shops and convenience services near the staging points;

V12. There was availability of telephone information on schedules and itineraries of the lines;

V13. Whenever I contacted the transportation company she answered my questions;

V14. There was availability of information from the transport service over the internet;

V15. There were campaigns to use the public transport service;

V16. The speed of public transportation vehicles was safe;

V17. The buses stopped only at the stopping points;

V18. The buses had security equipment;

V19. The sidewalks and bike paths were close to the stopping points;

V20. There was the facility to access the integrated transportation service (bus and subway);

V21. There were physical structures adapted for those with special needs to access the transportation service;

V22. You had a friendly attitude from the employees;

V23. The attitude of the staff showed their willingness to help me;

V24. My needs were quickly answered by the staff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Aquino, J.T., de Melo, F.J.C., Jerônimo, T.d. et al. Evaluation of Quality in Public Transport Services: The Use of Quality Dimensions as an Input for Fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 176–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0524-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0524-1

Keywords

Navigation