Skip to main content
Log in

Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Archimedean Aggregation Operators in Decision Making with the Dempster–Shafer Belief Structure

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a novel method for hesitant fuzzy linguistic decision making by utilizing Dempster–Shafer (D–S) theory of evidence. First, we propose some novel operations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) on the basis of closed operations on linguistic 2-tuples and distribution linguistic average aggregation (DLAA) operators. These novel operations not only avoid information loss and operational results exceeding the boundary of linguistic term sets, but also make the aggregation results interpretable. Then, we define the hesitant fuzzy linguistic Archimedean weighted arithmetic mean (HFLAWAM) and hesitant fuzzy linguistic Archimedean weighted geometric mean (HFLAWGM) operators of HFLTSs. These two proposed operators are able to overcome the shortcomings of the existing approaches to multicriteria decision making (MCDM) with HFLTSs. Then, to take into account the novel operations of HFLTSs and the MCDM under uncertainty, we propose the belief structure-HFLAWAM (BS-HFLAWAM) and belief structure-HFLAWGM (BS-HFLAWGM) operators of HFLTSs. After that, we create an approach to handle the hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM problems in light of proposed operators. Finally, we apply the created approach to a MCDM problem regarding political management of a country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: The 18th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 1378–1382 (2009)

  2. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25, 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Farhadinia, B.: A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 277, 102–110 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Meng, F.Y., Chen, X.H.: Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their application based on fuzzy measures. Cognit. Comput. 7, 445–463 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, N., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 2197–2211 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26, 410–425 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng, W.Y., Li, D.Q., Yin, Q.: Distance and similarity measures between hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 84, 267–271 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, D.Q., Zeng, W.Y., Li, J.H.: New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 40, 11–16 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 181(11), 2128–2138 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W., Pedrycz, W.: Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzymultiple attribute decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 41, 428–452 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng, F.Y., Chen, X.H., Zhang, Q.: Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy Shapley hybrid operators andtheir application in multi-attribute decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 28, 599–607 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl. Based Syst. 52, 53–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S.: The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl. Based Syst. 61, 48–58 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 873–884 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, C.C., Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L., Dong, Y.C., Herrera, F.: Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: an interval consistency index. Inf. Sci. 432, 347–361 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Adem, A., Çolak, A., Dağdeviren, M.: An integrated model using SWOT analysis and Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for evaluation occupational safety risks in life cycle of wind turbine. Saf. Sci. 106, 184–190 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, H.Y., Xu, Z.S., Ren, P.J., Liao, H.C.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection model to multi-criteria decision making for hospital decision support systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115, 449–458 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao, H.C., Yang, L.Y., Xu, Z.S.: Two new approaches based on ELECTRE II to solve the multiple criteria decision making problems with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 63, 223–234 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, B.W., Liang, H.M., Zhang, G.Q.: Reaching a consensus with minimum adjustment in MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf. Fusion 42, 12–23 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, L.W., Chen, S.M.: Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators. Inf. Sci. 294(3), 513–529 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, S.M., Hong, J.A.: Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 286, 63–74 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei, C.P., Zhao, N., Tang, X.J.: Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(3), 575–585 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Z., Wu, C.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 26(5), 2185–2202 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S.: Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf. Sci. 372, 407–427 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Comput. 21(21), 6515–6529 (2017)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Z., Guo, C.H.: New operations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with applications in multi-attribute group decision making. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2015.7337835

  28. Wan, S.P.: 2-Tuple linguistic hybrid arithmetic aggregation operators and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 45, 31–40 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, G.Q., Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F.: Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf. Fusion 17, 46–55 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tao, Z.F., Chen, H.Y., Zhou, L.G., Liu, J.P.: On new operational laws of 2-tuple linguistic information using Archimedean t-norm and s-norm. Knowl. Based Syst. 66, 156–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Shafer, G.A.: Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Merigó, J.M., Casanovas, M.: Decision making with Dempster–Shafer theory using fuzzy induced aggregation operators. Stud. Fuzziness Soft Comput. 265, 209–228 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Casanovas, M., Merigó, J.M.: Fuzzy aggregation operators in decision making with Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 7138–7149 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Merigó, J.M., Engemann, K.J., Palacios-Marqués, D.: Decision making with Dempster–Shafer belief structure and the OWAWA operator. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 19(sup1), S100–S118 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wei, G.W., Zhao, X.F., Lin, R.: Some hybrid aggregating operators in linguistic decision making with Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65, 646–651 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, W., Chen, Z.P.: The quasi-arithmetic intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operators. Knowl. Based Syst. 27(3), 219–233 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Merigó, J.M., Casanovas, M., Martinez, L.: Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 18(3), 287–304 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 78(1), 73–87 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L.: A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 43–58 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 746–752 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pérez-Asurmendi, P., Chiclana, F.: Linguistic majorities with difference in support. Appl. Soft Comput. 18, 196–208 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Found. Intell. Syst. 122, 287–295 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, Y.N., Chen, K.F., Zeng, B.X., Yang, M., Li, L.W.Y., Zhang, H.B.: A cloud decision framework in pure 2-tuple linguistic setting and its application for low-speed wind farm site selection. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 2154–2165 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou, L., Wu, X.H., Xu, Z.S., Fujita, H.: Emergency decision making for natural disasters: an overview. Int. J. Disas. Risk Reduct. 27, 567–576 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, F.L., Zhong, P., Sun, Y.M.: Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty: application in reservoir flood control operation. Environ. Model Softw. 100, 236–251 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chiclana, F., Mata, F., Pérez, L.G., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Type-1 OWA unbalanced fuzzy linguistic aggregation methodology: application to eurobonds credit risk evaluation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33, 1071–1088 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was funded by Special Funds of Taishan Scholars Project in Shandong Province (No. ts201511045) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71771140, 61603010, 61773029, 71471172, 61273230, 61603011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guolin Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Tang, G., Liu, P. et al. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Archimedean Aggregation Operators in Decision Making with the Dempster–Shafer Belief Structure. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 1330–1348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00660-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00660-8

Keywords

Navigation