Skip to main content
Log in

Cost Reduction of Inventory-Production-System in Multi-echelon Supply Chain Using Game Theory and Fuzzy Demand Forecasting

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industry commitments include inventory planning and control, aiming to find the most appropriate purchasing and managing inventory policies by examining the conditions and costs. The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is a mathematical model for inventory control in manufacturing systems. As a result, they should be developed from several perspectives to effectively utilize classic models' findings. The current study employs an EOQ model that involves creating new demand and on-time and regulated production variables while considering market demand in two-sided markets. The cost of the inventory-production system in the multi-echelon Supply Chain (SC) was reduced Using game theory and fuzzy demand forecasting. The findings revealed that the level of inventory maturity control has a strong relationship with accurate forecasting of fuzzy demand. As a result, precise forecasting of the ambiguous demands related to increasing price elasticity inevitably lowers retailer performance in SC. As price elasticity rises in response to market demand, all retailers should take the required steps to avoid losing sales. This problem boosts retailers' net profits as well as the overall management system's profitability while also lowering inventory control costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendalianpour, A.: Optimal Lot-size and Price of Perishable Goods: A Novel Game-Theoretic Model Using Double Interval Grey Numbers. Comput. Ind. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kong, X., Xu, Q., Zhu, T.: Dynamic evolution of knowledge sharing behavior among enterprises in the cluster innovation network based on evolutionary game theory. Sustain. 12, 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nouri, F.A., Nikabadi, M.S., Olfat, L.: The role of supply chain features in the effectiveness of sustainability practices in the service supply chain: application of fuzzy rule-based system. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 18, 867–899 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622019500111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, P., Shen, M., Teng, F., Zhu, B., Rong, L.: A multiple attribute decision making method based on free double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic information considering the prioritized and interactive attributes. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 156–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendalianpour, A.: Mathematical modeling for integrating production-routing-inventory perishable goods: a case study of blood products in iranian hospitals. In: International conference on dynamics in logistics. pp. 125–136 (2018)

  7. Hendalianpour, A., Fakhrabadi, M., Sangari, M.S., Razmi, J.: A combined benders decomposition and lagrangian relaxation algorithm for optimizing a multi-product, multi-level omni-channel distribution system. (2020)

  8. Taleizadeh, A.A.: A constrained integrated imperfect manufacturing-inventory system with preventive maintenance and partial backordering. Ann. Oper. Res. 261, 303–337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2563-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghasempoor Anaraki, M., Vladislav, D.S., Karbasian, M., Osintsev, N., Nozick, V.: Evaluation and selection of supplier in supply chain with fuzzy analytical network process approach. J. Fuzzy Ext. Appl. 2, 69–88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22105/JFEA.2021.274734.1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Z.: Optimal utilization of ports’ free-of-charge times in one distribution center and multiple ports inventory systems. Complexity (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4510586

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hendalianpour, A., Hamzehlou, M., Feylizadeh, M.R., Xie, N., Shakerizadeh, M.H.: Coordination and competition in two-echelon supply chain using grey revenue-sharing contracts. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-04-2020-0056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amirkhan, M., Didehkhani, H., Khalili-Damghani, K., Hafezalkotob, A.: Measuring performance of a three-stage network structure using data envelopment analysis and nash bargaining game: a supply chain application. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 17, 1429–1467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622018500426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Hamzehlou, M.: Pricing model of two-echelon supply chain for substitutable products based on double-interval grey-numbers. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-201206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hendalianpour, A., Razmi, J., Rameshi Sarvestani, A.: Applying decision tree models to SMEs: a statistics-based model for customer relationship management. J. Manag. Sci. Lett. (2016). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.5.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Guo, Q., Li, Z., Wu, Y.: Simulation and analysis of the complex behavior of supply chain inventory system based on third-party logistics management inventory model with no accumulating of unsatisfied demand. Complexity (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3194093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendalianpour, A., Fakhrabadi, M., Zhang, X., Feylizadeh, M.R., Gheisari, M., Liu, P., Ashktorab, N.: Hybrid model of IVFRN-BWM and robust goal programming in agile and flexible supply chain, a case study: automobile industry. IEEE Access. 7, 71481–71492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Razmi, J., Hosseini Rad, R., Sangari, M.S.: Developing a two-echelon mathematical model for a vendor-managed inventory (VMI) system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48, 773–783 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2301-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hendalianpour, A.: Customer satisfaction measurement using fuzzy neural network. Decis. Sci. Lett. 6, 193–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.8.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hendalianpour, A., Razmi, J., Fakhrabadi, M., Kokkinos, K., Papageorgiou, E.I.: A linguistic multi-objective mixed integer programming model for multi-echelon supply chain network at bio-refinery. EuroMed J. Manag. 2, 329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1504/emjm.2018.096453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Du, H., Jiang, Y.: Backup or reliability improvement strategy for a manufacturer facing heterogeneous consumers in a dynamic supply chain. IEEE Access. 7, 50419–50430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2911620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Razmi, J., Sangari, M.S.: A solution algorithm for integrated production-inventory-routing of perishable goods with transshipment and uncertain demand. Complex Intell. Syst. 1, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00264-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez Vergara, I.G., Arias Sánchez, J.A., Poveda-Bautista, R., Diego-Mas, J.A.: Improving distributed decision making in inventory management: a combined ABC-AHP approach supported by teamwork. Complexity (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6758108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, G., Zhang, L., Sun, H.: A method for partner selection of supply chain using interval-valued fuzzy sets - Fuzzy choquet integral and improved dempster-shafer theory. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 17, 1777–1804 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622018500438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taleizadeh, A.A., Stojkovska, I., Pentico, D.W.: An economic order quantity model with partial backordering and incremental discount. Comput. Ind. Eng. 82, 21–32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, J., Chang, J., Wu, Y.: The optimal production decision of competing supply chains when considering green degree: a game-theoretic approach. Sustainability. 12, 7413 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, H., Chen, D.: New optimal control decisions for channel system with lagged effect: dynamic advertising and pricing cases. IEEE Access. 7, 75350–75359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ibrahim, C., Mougharbel, I., Kanaan, H.Y., Georges, S.W., Daher, N.A., Saad, M.: Industrial loads used as virtual resources for a cost-effective optimized power distribution. IEEE Access. 8, 14901–14916 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2966736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pal, B., Sana, S.S., Chaudhuri, K.: Multi-item EOQ model while demand is sales price and price break sensitive. Econ. Model. 29, 2283–2288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Hamzehlou, M., Feylizadeh, M.R., Razmi, J.: Identify and rank the challenges of implementing sustainable supply chain blockchain technology using the bayesian best worst method. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 27, 656–680 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bao, Y., Ming, Z., Panchal, J.H., Wang, G., Yan, Y.: A reusable and executable information model of experiments on human decision making in systems engineering and design. IEEE Access. 8, 27597–27617 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2971738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao, S., Zhang, J.: Strategic joining and pricing policies in a retrial queue with orbital search and its application to call centers. IEEE Access. 7, 129317–129326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shaukat, B., Kiran, Q., Shatanawi, W., Ali, Y.: The study of lattice structure of bipartite stable matchings with flexible agents. IEEE Access. 7, 94666–94675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lei, L., Gao, S.: Evolutionary game analysis of ridesourcing industry between transportation network companies and passengers under new policies of ridesourcing. IEEE Access. 6, 71918–71931 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2882186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, Z., Rehman Khan, S.A.: Evolutionary game analysis of green agricultural product supply chain financing system: COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1879752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan, S.A.R., Zkik, K., Belhadi, A., Kamble, S.S.: Evaluating barriers and solutions for social sustainability adoption in multi-tier supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59, 3378–3397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rehman, K.S.A., Yu, Z., Sarwat, S., Godil, D.I., Amin, S., Shujaat, S.: The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organisational performance. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1872512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, Y., Chai, Y., Ma, L.: Research on multi-echelon inventory optimization for fresh products in supply chains. Sustain (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haque, M., Paul, S.K., Sarker, R., Essam, D.: A combined approach for modeling multi-echelon multi-period decentralized supply chain. Ann. Oper. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04121-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaban, A., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Tronci, M.: Coordinating of multi-echelon supply chains through the generalized (R, S) policy. SIMULATION 96, 767–778 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549720920708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Priyan, S., Mala, P.: Optimal inventory system for pharmaceutical products incorporating quality degradation with expiration date: A game theory approach. Oper. Res. Health Care. 24, 100245 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nourinejad, M., Ramezani, M.: Ride-Sourcing modeling and pricing in non-equilibrium two-sided markets. Transp. Res. Part B. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bajo-Buenestado, R., Kinateder, M.: Armstrong meets Rochet–Tirole: on the equivalence of different pricing structures in two-sided markets. Econ. Lett. 177, 43–46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.01.022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, Z.: Price cap regulation in a two-sided market: intended and unintended consequences. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 45, 28–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kind, H.J., Nilssen, T., Sørgard, L.: Inter-firm price coordination in a two-sided market. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 44, 101–112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vasconcelos, H.: Is exclusionary pricing anticompetitive in two-sided markets? Int. J. Ind. Organ. 40, 1–10 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Genakos, C., Valletti, T.: Regulating prices in two-sided markets: the waterbed experience in mobile telephony. Telecommun. Policy 36, 360–368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kelechi, A.H., Abdullah, N.F., Nordin, R., Ismail, M.: SMART: coordinated double-sided seal bid multiunit first price auction mechanism for cloud-based TVWS secondary spectrum market. IEEE Access. 5, 25958–25971 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2768964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hussain, A., Bui, V.H., Kim, H.M.: Robust optimal operation of AC/DC hybrid microgrids under market price uncertainties. IEEE Access. 6, 2654–2667 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2784834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gideon Ude, N., Yskandar, H., Coneth Graham, R.: A comprehensive state-of-the-art survey on the transmission network expansion planning optimization algorithms. IEEE Access. 7, 123158–123181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, X., Zhong, X., Lin, H., Qin, Z., Yang, X.: Lexicographic maximum solution of min-product fuzzy relation inequalities for modeling the optimal pricing with fixed priority grade in supply chain. IEEE Access. 6, 71306–71316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao, Y., Choi, T.-M., Cheng, T.C.E., Wang, S.: Supply option contracts with spot market and demand information updating. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266, 1062–1071 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Alamdar, S.F., Rabbani, M., Heydari, J.: Pricing, collection, and effort decisions with coordination contracts in a fuzzy, three-level closed-loop supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 104, 261–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Luo, Z., Chen, X., Kai, M.: The effect of customer value and power structure on retail supply chain product choice and pricing decisions. Omega 77, 115–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ranjan, A., Jha, J.K.: Pricing and coordination strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering green quality and sales effort. J. Clean. Prod. 218, 409–424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kaiser, U., Wright, J.: Price structure in two-sided markets: evidence from the magazine industry. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 24, 1–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Priyan, S., Uthayakumar, R.: Setup cost reduction EMQ inventory system with probabilistic defective and rework in multiple shipments management. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8, 223–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0418-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang, Q., Tsao, Y.-C., Chen, T.-H.: Economic order quantity under advance payment. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 5910–5921 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.040

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Wee, H.-M., Huang, Y.-D., Wang, W.-T., Cheng, Y.-L.: An EPQ model with partial backorders considering two backordering costs. Appl. Math. Comput. 232, 898–907 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.01.106

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Mukhopadhyay, A., Goswami, A.: Economic production quantity models for imperfect items with pollution costs. Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 2, 368–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2014.912571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jaber, M.Y., Zanoni, S., Zavanella, L.E.: Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155, 126–131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rezaei, J.: Economic order quantity for growing items. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 155, 109–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tai, A.H.: Economic production quantity models for deteriorating/imperfect products and service with rework. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66, 879–888 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Darwish, M.A.: EPQ models with varying setup cost. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 297–306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zare, A.G., Abouee-Mehrizi, H., Berman, O.: Two-echelon production inventory systems with strategic customers. Probab. Eng. Inform. Sci. 35, 258–275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964819000330

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang, K., Chen, S., Jiang, Z., Zhou, W., Geng, N.: Capacity allocation of an integrated production and service system. Prod. Oper. Manag. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Aka, S., Akyüz, G.: An inventory and production model with fuzzy parameters for the food sector. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 26, 627–637 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Naimi-Sadigh, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., Mozafari, M.: Optimal pricing and advertising decisions with suppliers’ oligopoly competition: stakelberg-nash game structures. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 17, 1423–1450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Safarzadeh, S., Rasti-Barzoki, M.: A game theoretic approach for pricing policies in a duopolistic supply chain considering energy productivity, industrial rebound effect, and government policies. Energy 167, 92–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rezaei, J., Salimi, N.: Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 137, 11–18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hosseini, S., Morshedlou, N., Ivanov, D., Sarder, M.D., Barker, K., Khaled, A.: Al: resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 213, 124–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hübner, A., Wollenburg, J., Holzapfel, A.: Retail logistics in the transition from multi-channel to omni-channel. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 46, 562–583 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2015-0179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Livshitz, I.I., Lontsikh, P.A., Lontsiklr, N.P., Karascv, S., Golovina, E.: The Actual Problems of IT-Security Process Assurance. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE international conference quality management, transport and information security, information technologies IT and QM and IS 2019. pp. 140–144 (2019)

  73. Potyomkina, M. V., Kibirev, Y. V., Lontsikh, P.A., Kunakov, E.P., Livshitz, I.I.: Machinery manufacturing and construction organisations processes and safety efficiency evaluation based on lean manufacturing approach. In: Proceedings of the 2017 international conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies”, IT and QM and IS 2017. pp. 761–765 (2017)

  74. Livshitz, I., Lontsikh, P., Eliseev, S.: The method of implementation of the numerical IT-Security metrics in management systems. In: Conference of open innovation association, FRUCT. pp. 242–247 (2017)

  75. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A.: A branch & cut/metaheuristic optimization of financial supply chain based on input-output network flows: investigating the iranian orthopedic footwear. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-201068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhang, X., Li, L., Le Vine, S., Liu, X.: An integrated pricing/planning strategy to optimize passenger rail service with uncertain demand. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36, 435–448 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Dong, Z., Leng, M.: Managing on-demand ridesharing operations: optimal pricing decisions for a ridesharing platform. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 232, 107958 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Cachon, G.P., Netessine, S.: Game theory in supply chain analysis. In: Models, methods, and applications for innovative decision making. pp. 200–233. INFORMS (2006)

  79. Salimi, P.S., Edalatpnanah, S.A.: Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP method and D-numbers. J. Fuzzy Ext. Appl. 1, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22105/JFEA.2020.248437.1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayad Hendalianpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Hamzehlou, M. et al. Cost Reduction of Inventory-Production-System in Multi-echelon Supply Chain Using Game Theory and Fuzzy Demand Forecasting. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24, 1793–1813 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01240-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01240-5

Keywords

Navigation