Skip to main content
Log in

A Multi-period Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization Model with Short Selling Constraints

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short selling is one of the important financial vehicles for real investment activities. Most of the traditional fuzzy portfolio models are established without short selling, which cannot effectively guide investors to make profits when stock prices tend to fall. This paper aims to address the multi-period portfolio problem with short selling under fuzzy environment. To comprehensively consider the effect of short selling on the investment process, we propose three types of short selling constraints, i.e., total short selling proportion constraint, short selling cardinality constraint, and lower and upper bound constraint. Then, we establish a multi-period possibilistic mean-semi-variance portfolio selection model with multiple short selling constraints. Next, we design a multiple particle swarm optimization with simulated annealing to solve it. Finally, we illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model and algorithm via a numerical example using actual stock data. The results show that short selling has a significant impact on investment decisions, and our proposed model can help investors construct portfolio strategies with short selling to improve their investment return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharpe, W.F.: Capital asset price: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance 19(3), 425–442 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merton, R.C.: An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 7(4), 1851–1872 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, P., Dang, S.: The weighted lower and upper admissible mean downside semi-variance portfolio selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01055-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inform. Contr. 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, X.X.: A review of credibilistic portfolio selection. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Ma. 8(3), 263–281 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, X., Zhao, J., Li, Z.: Sensitivity analysis of the fuzzy mean-entropy portfolio model with transaction costs based on credibility theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 209–218 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehlawat, M.K., Gupta, P., Kumar, A., Yadav, S., Aggarwal, A.: Multiobjective fuzzy portfolio performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis under credibilistic framework. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28(11), 2726–2737 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., Fabozzi, F.J.: Portfolio selection with conservative short-selling. Financ. Res. Lett. 18, 363–369 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, M., Chen, P.: Mean–variance portfolio selection with regime switching under shorting prohibition. Oper. Res. Lett. 44(5), 658–662 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, Y., Zheng, H.: Optimal investment of DC pension plan under short-selling constraints and portfolio insurance. Insur. Math. Econ. 85, 47–59 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gómez, J.P., Sharma, T.: Portfolio delegation under short-selling constraints. Econ. Theory 28(1), 173–196 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, J.R., Lee, W.Y.: Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209(2), 166–175 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Kumar, A., Yadav, S., Aggarwal, A.: A credibilistic fuzzy DEA approach for portfolio efficiency evaluation and rebalancing toward benchmark portfolios using positive and negative returns. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22(3), 824–843 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khodamoradi, T., Salahi, M., Najafi, A.R.: Robust CCMV model with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate. Physica A 547, 124429 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo, S.N., Yu, L., Li, X., Kar, S.: Fuzzy multi-period portfolio selection with different investment horizons. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254(3), 1026–1035 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Yadav, S., Kumar, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy optimistic and pessimistic multi-period portfolio optimization models. Soft Comput. 24(7), 11931–11956 (2020)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Y.J., Zhang, W.G.: A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242(3), 933–941 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y.J., Zhang, W.G.: Fuzzy portfolio selection model with real features and different decision behaviors. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Ma. 17(3), 317–336 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehlawat, M.K.: Credibilistic mean-entropy models for multi-period portfolio selection with multi-choice aspiration levels. Inf. Sci. 345, 9–26 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, X.Y., Liu, W.L., Chen, S.D., Zhang, Y.: A multi-period fuzzy mean-minimax risk portfolio model with investor’s risk attitude. Soft Comput. 25(4), 2949–2963 (2021)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, W.G., Liu, Y.J., Xu, W.J.: A possibilistic mean-semivariance-entropy model for multi-period portfolio selection with transaction costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222(2), 341–349 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Liagkouras, K., Metaxiotis, K.: Multi-period mean-variance fuzzy portfolio optimization model with transaction costs. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 67, 260–269 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia, T., Pan, Y., Liang, H., Lam, H.K.: Event-based adaptive fixed-time fuzzy control for active vehicle suspension systems with time-varying displacement constraint. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3075490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A., Fakhrabadi, M., Feylizadeh, M.: Integrating IVFRN-BWM and goal programming to allocate the order quantity considering discount for green supplier. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01181-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pan, Y., Li, Q., Liang, H., Lam, H.K.: A novel mixed control approach for fuzzy systems via membership functions online learning policy. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3130201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Carlsson, C., Robert, F., Péter, M.: A possibilistic approach to selecting portfolios with highest utility score. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 131(1), 13–21 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, F.I., Tsaur, R.C.: Fuzzy portfolio selection using a weighted function of possibilistic mean and variance in business cycles. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(2), 151–159 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, W., Xu, W.: A hybrid multiobjective bat algorithm for fuzzy portfolio optimization with real-world constraints. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(1), 291–307 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsaur, R.C., Chiu, C.L., Huang, Y.Y.: Guaranteed rate of return for excess investment in a fuzzy portfolio analysis. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 23(1), 94–106 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gong, X., Yu, C., Min, L., Ge, Z.: Regret theory-based fuzzy multi-objective portfolio selection model involving DEA cross-efficiency and higher moments. Appl. Soft Comput. 100, 106958 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mossin, J.: Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. Core Discuss. Papers Rp 41(2), 215–229 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, C., Wu, Y., Lu, Z., Wang, J.: A multiperiod multiobjective portfolio selection model with fuzzy random returns for large scale securities data. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29(1), 59–74 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo, S.N., Ching, W.K., Li, W.K., Siu, T.K., Zhang, W.G.: Fuzzy hidden Markov-switching portfolio selection with capital gain tax. Expert Syst. Appl. 149(1), 113304 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadjadi, S.J., Seyedhosseini, S.M., Hassanlou, K.: Fuzzy multiperiod portfolio selection with different rates for borrowing and lending. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(4), 3821–3826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thi, H.A.L., Moeini, M.: Long-short portfolio optimization under cardinality constraints by difference of convex functions algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 161(1), 199–214 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Guerra, M.L., Stefanini, L.: Approximate fuzzy arithmetic operations using monotonic interpolations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 150(1), 5–33 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Carlsson, C., Fullér, R.: On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 122(2), 315–326 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin, C.C.: A weighted max-min model for fuzzy goal programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 142(3), 407–420 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Hendalianpour, A., Fakhrabadi, M., Sangari, M.S., Razmi, J.: A combined benders decomposition and Lagrangian relaxation algorithm for optimizing a multi-product, multi-level omni-channel distribution system. Int. J. Sci. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.24200/SCi.2020.53644.3349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, P., Hendalianpour, A.: A branch & cut/metaheuristic optimization of financial supply chain based on input-output network flows: investigating the Iranian orthopedic footwear. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-201068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vercher, E., José, D.: Fuzzy portfolio optimization under downside risk measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158(7), 769–782 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, W.G., Wang, Y.L., Chen, Z.P., Nie, Z.K.: Possibilistic mean–variance models and efficient frontiers for portfolio selection problem. Inf. Sci. 177(13), 2787–2801 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Chang, E.C., Yan, L., Ren, J.: Short-selling, margin-trading, and price efficiency: evidence from the Chinese market. J. Bank Financ. 48, 411–424 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71501049) and the Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 21YJA630117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, XY., Chen, SD., Liu, WL. et al. A Multi-period Fuzzy Portfolio Optimization Model with Short Selling Constraints. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24, 2798–2812 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01294-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01294-z

Keywords

Navigation