Skip to main content
Log in

Fun and Games: Player Profiles

  • Published:
The Computer Games Journal

Abstract

This paper presents findings about player preferences regarding characteristics of gaming experiences. It describes a quantitative investigation employing a survey with 27 items as a basis to categorise players in profiles, and it shows how the fun factors represented by the survey items relate to each other. The survey was applied to 634 students in Florianópolis (Brazil). A factorial analysis method was used to understand how the fun factors are associated with one other in the players’ opinions, and it generated six dimensions of fun, every one of which can be described as a way to have fun: (1) Improvement, (2) Distinction, (3) Immersion, (4) Decoration, (5) Empathy, and (6) Grotesque. A cluster analysis method was used to divide players into eight profiles, every one of which describes the preferences of a group of players who declared to have fun with similar aspects. The profiles were named as: (1) Competitive and Enthusiastic; (2) Competitive and Selfish; (3) Competitive and Overcoming; (4) Immersed in the Beauty; (5) Immersed and Selfish; (6) Distracted and Uninterested; (7) Quitters; and, (8) Friendly and Overcoming. The results are a useful source to reflect on game design and fun, and to consider topics such as violence, verisimilitude, distraction, socialization, as well as the multiplicity of modes of engagement with digital game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barendregt, W., Bekker, M. M., & Speerstra, M. (2003). Empirical evaluation of usability and fun in computer games for children. In M. Rauterberg, (Ed.) Human-computer interaction: INTERACT’03 (pp. 705–708). IOS Press, (c) IFIP.

  • Bilgihan, A., Cobanoglu, C., Nusair, K., Okumus, F., & Bujisic, M. (2013). A quantitative study exploring the difference between gaming genre preferences. The Computer Games Journal, 2(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, M. C. R., Stermer, S. P., & Burgess, S. R. (2007). Sex, lies, and video games: The portrayal of male and female characters on video game covers. Sex Roles, 57(5–6), 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and by Meyer Barash (p. 208). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calleja, G. (2007). Digital game involvement: A conceptual model. Game and Culture, 2(3). Retrieved February 10, 2011.

  • Carruthers, J. (2012). A balanced analysis of the evidence for the effects of violent video games on social behaviour. The Computer Games Journal, 1(2), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, D. M., Ramos, D. K., & Albuquerque, R. M. (2012). Jogos eletrônicos e aprendizagem: o que as crianças e os jovens têm a dizer? Contrapontos, 12(1), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. USA: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire, H., & Wiberg, C. (2009). Game usability heuristics (play) for evaluating and designing better games: The next iteration. Online Communities and Social Computing, 56(21). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Dill, K. E., & Thill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 851–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eglesz, D., Fekete, I., Kiss, O. E., & Izsó, L. (2005). Computer games are fun? On professional games and players’ motivations. Educational Media International, 42(2). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Fullerton, T. (2008). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games (2nd ed.). USA: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B. S., Sherry, J., Lachlan, K., Kristen, L., & Holmstrom, A. (2010). Orientation to video games among gender and age groups. Simulation and Gaming, 41(2). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Hamlen, K. R. (2011). Children’s choices and strategies in video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 532–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, L., Neapolitan, D., & Risden, K. (2004). Evaluating computer game concepts with children. MD, USA: IDC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. & Nadelson, L. (2010). Motivational engagement and video gaming: a mixed methods study. Education Technology Research, 58(1). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Inal, Y., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment. British journal of Educational Technology, 38(3). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Johnson, S. (2005). Everything bad is good for you: How today’s popular culture is actually making us smarter. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2002). Killing monsters: Why children need fantasy, super heroes, and make-believe violence. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. (2005). On educational game design: Building blocks of flow experience. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University of Technology Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, R. (2005). A theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale, Arizona: Paragliph Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. Snow & M. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: III conative and affective process analyzes (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäyrä, F. (2008). An introduction to game studies: Games in culture. Padstow, Cornwall: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, S. (2000). Trigger happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution. New York: Arcade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, H. (1965). The origins of form in art. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. (2012). Motivation in video games: A literature review. The Computer Games Journal, 1(2), 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuytema, P. (2006). Game design: A practical approach (Game Development Series). Rockland, MA: Charles River Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. (2003) Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 1(2). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Sweetser, P. & Wyeth, P. (2005) Game flow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment, 3(3). Retrieved in February 10, 2011.

  • Westwood, D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The role of structural characteristics in video-game play motivation: A Q-methodology study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(5), 581–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Marques de Albuquerque.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Albuquerque, R.M., Fialho, F.A.P. Fun and Games: Player Profiles. Comput Game J 4, 31–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-015-0003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-015-0003-y

Keywords

Navigation