Abstract
The Ultima: Age of Enlightenment series is a rich entry into the fantasy genre. In addition to serving as an innovative model for early computer role-playing games (CRPGs), the series practically invents a genre of what can be called “ethical gaming,” as it insists on a commitment to virtuous activity in order to complete and master the games. Compared to more linear hack-and-slash or CRPG of the period, the Ultima series not only offers an unusually involved and difficult experience, but also makes explicit and even mandatory ethical and moral dimensions that many saw earlier role-playing games as lacking. However, rather than merely encourage the player to conform to the moral expectations of the game by following procedural rules, the series brings into question the political and spiritual affiliations of virtue. This paper attends to the development of the Age of Enlightenment trilogy—Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar (Origin, 1985), Ultima V: Warriors of Destiny (Origin, 1988), and Ultima VI: The False Prophet (Origin, 1990)—as a series of games that both encourage ethical behavior and later offer a critical examination of the ethical basis that the earliest entry in the trilogy advocates. At the heart of the Age of Enlightenment series is a distinction between absolutist ethics and virtue ethics. In the vein of its most eloquent advocate Immanuel Kant, absolutist theories of ethics begin with principles, duties, and rules that are fundamental and transcendent, and which the moral actor must follow. It is a normative and regulatory system, and exists prior to experience. Virtue ethics challenge the emphasis on duties and rules, instead stressing the importance on motive and character. In this paradigm, “sensitivity, experience, and judgment would seem to make general theories unnecessary and unhelpful” (Slote, in: Skorupski (ed) The Routledge companion to ethics, Routledge, London, 2010, p. 479). Or, as Welchman (The practice of virtue: classic and contemporary readings in virtue ethics, Hackett, Indianapolis, 2006) succinctly phrases it, for virtue ethicists, “the question of how to act is more important than what we should act for” (p. ix) She adds, in a phrase cannily suggestive for those who have played Ultima, “moral judgment is not essentially the application of a moral ‘technical manual’ to life” (p. xvi). In the intriguing narrative developments over the course of the Age of Enlightenment trilogy, that “moral technical manual” can be invented and exploited by those who rely on its ability to maintain an unchallenged hierarchy that depends on the principles it contains. And when those rules are applied unilaterally or cross-culturally, they are revealed to be inflexible and even inapplicable, a realization embodied in the narrative and rhetorical transitions I will show occurring between Ultima IV to Ultima VI. More than just a highminded game, I argue that Ultima makes an argument about virtue through what Bogost (Persuasive games: the expressive power of videogames, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2010) calls its procedural rhetoric. To play the Age of Enlightenment series is to grapple with the question of whether morality has relative or transcendent foundations, and the game introduces compelling arguments only to later challenge them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. R., III. (1985). The History of Britannia as told by Kyle the Younger. Manchester: Origin Systems.
Addams, S. (1990). The official book of Ultima. Greensboro: Compute! Books.
Anon. (2011). Xu4-Ultima IV recreated. http://xu4.sourceforge.net/. Accessed April 10, 2017.
Anon. (2017a). About Lazarus. Ultima V: Lazarus. http://www.u5lazarus.com/AboutLazarus.php. Accessed April 17, 2017.
Anon. (2017b) Eight virtues. http://ultima.wikia.com/wiki/Eight_Virtues#Lord_Blackthorn.27s_Code_of_Virtue. Accessed January 22, 2017.
Aschultz. (2003). Ultima V: Warriors of destiny FAQ/walkthrough for PC. http://www.gamefaqs.com/pc/562661-ultima-v-warriors-of-destiny/faqs/8307. Accessed January 22, 2017.
Barton, M. (2008). Dungeons and desktops: The history of computer role-playing games. Wellesley: A.K. Peters Ltd.
Belford, P., & Heron, M. J. (2013). ‘It’s only a game’—Ethics, empathy and identification in game morality systems. The Computer Games Journal, 2(2), 34–52.
Bogost, I. (2010). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bogost, I. (2011). How to do things with videogames. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Burrill, D. A. (2008). Die tryin’: Videogames, masculinity, culture. New York: Peter Lang.
Calvert, M., & Terry, J. (Eds.). (1997). Processed lives: Gender and technology in everyday life. London: Routledge.
Chan, D. (2005). Playing with race: The ethics of racialized representations in e-games. International Review of Information Ethics, 4, 24–30.
Cooper, H. (1999). Romance after 1400. In D. Wallace (Ed.), The Cambridge history of medieval english literature (pp. 690–719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Field, R. (1999). Romance in England. In D. Wallace (Ed.), The Cambridge history of medieval english literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (2014). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martins Griffin.
Gygax, G. (1978). Advanced Dungeons & Dragons players handbook (1st ed.). Lake Geneva: TSR Hobbies.
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
Journet, D. (2007). Narrative, action, and learning: The stories of Myst. In C. L. Selfe & G. E. Hawisher (Eds.), Gaming lives in the twenty-first century (pp. 93–120). New York: McMillan.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Maher, J. (2016). Ultima V. The digital antiquarian. http://www.filfre.net/2016/02/ultima-v/. Accessed January 22, 2017.
Malone, G. (1990). Compendium. Austin: Origin.
McNeil, E. (2014). Grinding and the burden of optimal play. Gamasutra. http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/EdwardMcNeill/20140721/221443/Grinding_and_the_Burden_of_Optimal_Play.php. Accessed April 13, 2017.
Monnens, D. (2011). War and play: Insensitivity and humanity in the realm of pushbutton warfare. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques, and frameworks (pp. 83–97). Hershey: IGI Global.
Olivetti, J. (2015). The game archaeologist: The assassination of lord British. Massively overpowered. http://massivelyop.com/2015/10/03/the-game-archaeologist-the-assassination-of-lord-british/. Accessed January 5, 2017.
Rauch, P. (2011). God of war: What is it good for? Nietzsche’s “master morality” and the single-player action/adventure game. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques and frameworks (pp. 99–108). Hershey: IGI Global.
Rogers, R., Woolley, J., Sherrick, B., et al. (2017). Fun versus meaningful video game experiences: A qualitative analysis of user responses. The Computer Games Journal, 6(1), 63–79.
Schreiber, I., et al. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in gameplay: Choosing between right and right. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques and frameworks (pp. 72–83). Hershey: IGI Global.
Sicart, M. (2009). The ethics of computer games. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Slote, M. (2010). Virtue ethics. In J. Skorupski (Ed.), The Routledge companion to ethics (pp. 478–490). London: Routledge.
Welchman, J. (Ed.). (2006). The practice of virtue: Classic and contemporary readings in virtue ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Xenerxes Dragon. (2014). Ultima savegame editor. Ultimatrix. http://www.xenerkes.com/tools/ultima-savegame-editor/. Accessed April 17, 2017.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Matt Barton for encouraging the development of this paper and this journal as a venue. The three anonymous reviewers for The Computer Games Journal offered extensive and provocative comments. Also, the author wishes to thank Rachel Wood, John Muenzberg, Porter Olsen, and Ben Roberts for their valuable input and generous feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Black, A. Lord British’s Ethics—Interrogating Virtue in the Ultima: Age of Enlightenment Series. Comput Game J 6, 113–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-017-0034-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-017-0034-7