Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Impact of the Alphabetical Ordering of Names in User Interfaces

A Potential Approach for Gender Bias Identification

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Listing people alphabetically on an electronic output device is a traditional technique, since alphabetical order is easily perceived by users and facilitates access to information. However, this apparently harmless technique, especially when the list is ordered by first name, needs to be used with caution by designers and programmers. We show, via empirical data analysis, that when an interface displays people’s first name in alphabetical order in several pages/screens, each page/screen may have imbalances in respect to gender of its Top-k individuals. k represents the size of the list of names visualized first, which may be the number of names that fits in a screen page of a certain device. The research work was carried out with the analysis of actual datasets of names of five different countries. Each dataset has a person name and the frequency of adoption of the name in the country. Our analysis shows that, even though all countries have exhibit imbalance problems, the samples of individuals with Brazilian and Spanish first names are more prone to gender imbalance among their Top-k individuals. These results can be useful for designers and engineers to construct information systems that avoid introduction gender bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman B, Nissenbaum H. Bias in computer systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1996;14(3):330–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shifrin CA. Justice will weigh suit challenging airlines computer reservations. Aviat Week Space Technol. 1985;122(12):105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I MOHD TAIB. Loophole allows bias in displays on computer reservations systems. Aviat Week Space Technol. 1990;132(7).

  4. Carney DR, Banaji MR. First is best. PloS One. 2012;7(6):e35088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Einav L, Yariv L. What’s in a surname? The effects of surname initials on academic success. J Econ Perspect. 2006;20(1):175–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feenberg D, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Gruber J. It’s good to be first: order bias in reading and citing nber working papers. Rev Econ Stat. 2017;99(1):32–9.

  7. Haque A, Ginsparg P. Positional effects on citation and readership in arxiv. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2009;60(11):2203–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs H, Hillert A. Alphabetic bias, investor recognition, and trading behavior. Rev Finance. 2015;20(2):693–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zehlike M, Bonchi F, Castillo C, Ajian S, Mohamed M, Ricardo B-Y. Fa* ir: a fair top-k ranking algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 2017. pp. 1569–78.

  10. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol. 1954;47(6):381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirolli P. Information foraging theory: adaptive interaction with information. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. American Adoptions. 2019. https://www.americanadoptions.com/family_profile/browse?family_types%5B3%5D=Same+Sex+Male&family_types%5B4%5D=Same+Sex+Female&fpch=&search=search&embed=&onLoadScrollTo=fp-list. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  13. Busca de candidatos. 2019. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/eleicoes/candidatos/#2018/deputado-estadual-distrital/sp . Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  14. Hassenzahl M. The hedonic/pragmatic model of user experience. Towards a UX manifesto, 10; 2007.

  15. Hassenzahl M, Wiklund-Engblom A, Bengs A, Hägglund S, Diefenbach S. Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2015;31(8):530–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassenzahl M. The thing and i: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Funology 2. Springer; 2018. pp 301–13.

  17. Culnan MJ. Protecting privacy online: is self-regulation working? J Public Policy Mark. 2000;19(1):20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. INSEE. 2019. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3532172. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  19. Social Security Administration. 2018. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  20. World Bank Group. 2019. https://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states?view=chart. Accessed 22 May 2019.

  21. National Records of Scotland. 2019. https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/names/babies-first-names/babies-first-names-summary-records-comma-separated-value-csv-format. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  22. National Statistics Institute. 2019. http://www.ine.es. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  23. Saeed S, Umar MS, Ali MA, Musheer A. Fisher-yates chaotic shuffling based image encryption. 2014. arXiv:1410.7540.

  24. Yang K, Stoyanovich J. Measuring fairness in ranked outputs. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on scientific and statistical database management. ACM, 2017. p 22.

  25. Nadaraya EA. On estimating regression. Theory Probab Appl. 1964;9(1):141–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watson GS. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhyā Indian J Stat Ser A 1964;359–72.

  27. Racine J, Li Q. Nonparametric estimation of regression functions with both categorical and continuous data. J Econom. 2004;119(1):99–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen J. Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing; 1999.

  29. Pemberton S. Hotel heartbreak interactions. 2003;10(5):64.

  30. MacKenzie IS. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact. 1992;7(1):91–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fishburn PC. Exceptional paper–lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manag Sci. 1974;20(11):1442–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ. 1955;69(1):99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoyanovich J, Yang K, Jagadish HV. Online set selection with fairness and diversity constraints. In: Proceedings of the EDBT conference, 2018.

  34. Järvelin K, Kekäläinen J. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2002;20(4):422–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ray D, Robson A. Certified random: a new order for coauthorship. Am Econ Rev. 2018;108(2):489–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber M. The effects of listing authors in alphabetical order: a review of the empirical evidence. Res Eval. 2018;27(3):238–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Asudeh A, Jagadish HV, Stoyanovich J, Das G. Designing fair ranking schemes. 2017. arXiv:1712.09752.

  38. Celis LE, Straszak D, Vishnoi NK. Ranking with fairness constraints. 2017. corr abs/1704.06840 (2017). arXiv:1704.06840.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil

    Daniel Sullivan, Carlos Caminha, Victor Dantas, Elizabeth Furtado & Vasco Furtado

  2. Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Virgílio Almeida

Authors
  1. Daniel Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Caminha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor Dantas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth Furtado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vasco Furtado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Virgílio Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, D., Caminha, C., Dantas, V. et al. Understanding the Impact of the Alphabetical Ordering of Names in User Interfaces. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 472 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00877-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00877-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation