Skip to main content
Log in

Safety criticism and ethical dilemma of autonomous vehicles

  • Commentary
  • Published:
AI and Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid commercialization of autonomous vehicles (AVs), opportunities and challenges co-exist. In the spring 2018, the first pedestrian fatality caused by Uber driverless vehicle drew global attention, through which two critical issues, safety criticism and ethical dilemma, emerge. In this work, safety quarrel and safety liability are investigated, and the ethical dilemma is discussed when AVs are confronted with collisions. Two reasons for the formation of the ethical dilemma are presented, and then, the feature that AVs makes ethical selection far from real scenes is discussed. To solve the issues, the countermeasures are put forth from the theory of deontology, utilitarianism, and machine learning approaches. Further discussion provides three possible solutions to safety liability and ethical dilemma, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagloee, S.A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., Oliver, T.: Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. J. Mod. Transp. 24(4), 284–303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnefon, J.F., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I.: The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352(6293), 1573–1576 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Du, Y.: On the moral responsibility in robot ethics. Stud. Sci. Sci. 35(11), 1608–1613 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duffy, S., Hopkins, J.: Sit, stay, drive: the future of autonomous car liability. SMU Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 16, 453–480 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 167–181 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleetwood, J.: Public health, ethics, and autonomous vehicles. Am. J. Public Health 107(4), 532–537 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fromm, E.: Man for himself. Ethics 59–60 (1947)

  8. He, H.: An analysis of the ethical dilemma, causes and countermeasures of driverless vehicles. Stud. Dialectics Nat. 33, 58–62 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hevelke, A., Nida-Rümelin, J.: Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21, 619–630 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard, P.: “Sophisticated robots”: balancing liability, regulation, and innovation. Fla. Law Rev. 66, 1803–1872 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koopman, P., Wagner, M.: Autonomous vehicle safety: an interdisciplinary challenge. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 9(1), 90–96 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leben, D.: A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19(2), 107–115 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipson, H., Kuman, M.: Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead, pp. 57–58. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, H.Y.: Irresponsibilities, inequalities, and injustice for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19, 193–207 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchant, G., Lindor, R.: The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Rev. 52, 1321–1340 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martinho, A., Herber, N., Kroesen, M., Chorus, C.: Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry. Transp. Rev. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1862355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunes, A., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J.F.: People must retain control of autonomous vehicles. Nature 556, 169–171 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira, R.H.M., Schwanen, T., Banister, D.: Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transp. Rev. 37(2), 170–191 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Santoni de Sio, F.: Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 20, 411–429 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sparrow, R., Howard, M.: When human beings are like drunk robots: driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 80, 206–215 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiseman, Y., Grinberg, I.: Circumspectly crash of autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT 2016), pp. 387–392. Grand Forks, North Darkota, USA (2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [YH], [SW], and [XX]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [WL] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuecai Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Huang, Y., Wang, S. et al. Safety criticism and ethical dilemma of autonomous vehicles. AI Ethics 2, 869–874 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00128-2

Keywords

Navigation