A parallel approach to syntax for generation
References (38)
Intelligence without representation
Artif. Intell.
(1991)Preface to the Special Issue on Connectionist Symbol Processing
Artif. Intell.
(1990)- et al.
An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation
Cogn. Sci.
(1987) An overview of head-driven bottom-up generation
- et al.
Pengi: an implementation of a theory of activity
The competing plans hypothesis: an heuristic viewpoint on the causes of errors in speech
The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative
Conceptual and linguistic decisions in generation
Incremental sentence generation: a computer model of grammatical encoding
- et al.
Computing with structured connectionist networks
Commun. ACM
(1988)
The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”
On grammatical constructions, course notes
POPEL-HOW: A distributed parallel model for incremental natural language production with feedback
A connectionist model of sentence generation in a first and second language
A knowledge-based approach to language generation
Representing and integrating linguistic knowledge
Generation of simple sentences in English using the connectionist model of computation
Why trees in syntax?
Stud. Linguist.
Cited by (7)
Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production - An online study
2001, CognitionCitation Excerpt :Such data are in line, moreover, with corpus linguistic observations of naturally occurring speech which provide evidence of the use of a phrasal grammatical encoding scope during speech production (Clark & Wasow, 1998; Garrett, 1975, 1976, 1980). Importantly, such a view of the scope of syntactic planning accords well with incremental models of speech production which have emphasized that speech production, rather than being holistic so that the grammatical structure of an entire sentence is generated simultaneously, is piecemeal so that the grammatical structure of a sentence is broken down into discrete phrasal chunks and formulated at successive points in time (De Smedt, 1994, 1996; Ferreira, 1996; Kempen, 1987; Kempen & Hoenkamp, 1987; Levelt, 1989; Ward, 1992; Wheeldon, Meyer, & Smith, in press; Wundt, 1900). In short, the present study offers a first look at the phenomenon of syntactic persistence in the context of an online experimental design.
High level processing scope in spoken sentence production
1999, CognitionLanguage control and code-switching
2018, LanguagesA control process model of code-switching
2014, Language, Cognition and NeuroscienceArchitectures for natural language generation: Problems and perspectives
1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)