PaperModels and languages for the interoperability of smart instruments☆
References (44)
- et al.
Coherence of a distributed application under critical time constraints
- et al.
The self-validating sensor: rationale, definitions and examples
Control Engng Practice
(1993) - et al.
Smart actuators: generic functional architecture, service and cost analysis
- et al.
Information system in distributed intelligent automation processes
- et al.
Hierarchical data and processing structures for the integration of production processes
- et al.
A generic functional model of smart instruments for distributed architectures (1993b)
- et al.
Fault detection and isolation in Smart Actuators
- et al.
Fonctionnalités système des constituants intelligents
- et al.
Fault detection and isolation and mode management in smart actuators
Capteurs symboliques et capteurs flous: un nouveau pas vers l'intelligence
Hierarchical data validation in control systems using smart actuators and sensors
Surveillance de processus industriels complexes. Génération et optimisation des relations de redondance analytiques
Bus de terrain: etat de l'art et perspectives
L'impact de FIP sur la conception des architectures
Revue générale de l'électricité
Project Information
ESPRIT Project 2172
L'application de FIP sur le site pilote industriel de la centrale ENEL de Piombino
Analyse fonctionnelle et modèle générique des capteurs intelligents—application à la surveillance de l'anesthésie
Gif Interoperability Guidelines
SADT: un langage pour communiquer
Project EUREKA EU 666 INCA (Interface Normalisée pour Capteurs et Actionneurs)
Tâche 0B, Rapport final des travaux
User Layer Technical Report for The Fieldbus Standard
Cited by (57)
Process control strategies applied to microalgae-based biofuel production
2022, 3rd Generation Biofuels: Disruptive Technologies to Enable Commercial ProductionAn optimal ensemble of the Noah-MP land surface model for simulating surface heat fluxes over a typical subtropical forest in South China
2020, Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyCitation Excerpt :EB-7 is similar to EB-6 with the only difference being that it replaces Jarvis canopy resistance option to better distinguish the effect of canopy. EB-8 adopts the default 1D-Noah LSM model to play role of eternal model to describe the device from the point of view of the services it is able to provide to external entities (Staroswiecki and Bayart, 1996). The average ranking of the simulation results for each combination based on the statistical metrics is the final ranking.
Graphical methods for diagnosis of dynamic systems: Review
2014, Annual Reviews in ControlThe concept of the smart wagon for improving the safety of a railroad transportation system
2010, IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)The Safe-SADT method for aiding designers to choose and improve dependable architectures for complex automated systems
2008, Reliability Engineering and System SafetySupervisory synthesis for product-driven automation and its application to a flexible assembly cell
2007, Control Engineering Practice
- ☆
The original version of this paper was presented at the 2nd IFAC Symposium on Intelligent Components and Instruments for Control Applications (SICICA'94), which was held in Budapest, Hungary during 8–10 June 1994. The Published Proceedings of this IFAC meeting may be ordered from Elsevier Science Limited, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, U.K. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Editor C. C. Hang.