Neither the greedy nor the delaunay triangulation of a planar point set approximates the optimal triangulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(79)90104-2Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (8)

  • N. Christofides

    Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the Travelling Salesman Problem

  • D.E. Knuth

    Big omicron and big omega and big theta

    SIGACT news

    (April–June, 1976)
  • E.L. Lloyd

    On triangulations of a set of points in the plane

    Proc. 18th Annual IEEE Conference on the Foundations of Computer Science

    (1977)
  • G.K. Manacher et al.

    A fast, space-efficient average-case algorithm for the ‘greedy’ triangulation of a point set, and a proof that the greedy triangulation is not approximately optimal

    Proc. Sixteenth Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing

    (1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Good triangulations yield good tours

    2008, Computers and Operations Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nevertheless, the DT and GT are on average close to the MWT [36]. Interestingly, Manacher and Zobrist [35] have shown that the total edge length of the DT can be significantly larger than the total edge length of the GT for the same point set. Therefore, the GT seems to be the better of the two in approximating the MWT.

  • On exclusion regions for optimal triangulations

    2001, Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Fast greedy triangulation algorithms

    1997, Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications
  • Drawing outerplanar minimum weight triangulations

    1996, Information Processing Letters
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text