Infinite Lyndon words

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(94)90016-7Get rights and content

Abstract

We define an infinite Lyndon word as the limit of an increasing sequence of prefix preserving lyndon words and show that some of the interesting properties of Lyndon words generalize to the infinite case. We construct a queue automaton that recognizes the set of Lyndon words and show that it can be extended to recognize infinite Lyndon words. We discuss certain topological properties of the set of infinite Lyndon words such as homeomorphism with a subspace of the Cantor space.

References (4)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (41)

  • On infinite prefix normal words

    2021, Theoretical Computer Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Notice that the prefix normal condition is different from the Lyndon condition2: for finite words, there are words which are both Lyndon and prefix normal (e.g. 110010), words which are Lyndon but not prefix normal (11100110110), words which are prefix normal but not Lyndon (110101), and words which are neither (101100). We study infinite prefix normal words and their prefix normal forms in the context of lexicographic orderings, and compare them to infinite Lyndon words [32] and the max- and min-words of [26] (Corollary 5). Finally, we give conditions for periodicity and ultimate periodicity of prefix normal words in terms of their minimum density, a parameter introduced in [14] (Theorem 8).

  • Reprint of: Generalized Lyndon factorizations of infinite words

    2020, Theoretical Computer Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This follows directly from Theorems 9, 13, and 18. Siromoney et al. showed in [19] that the infinite Lyndon words are precisely the limits of prefix-preserving increasing sequences of finite Lyndon words. We show that this result still holds when Lyndon words are replaced with generalized Lyndon words provided that the infinite word is primitive.

  • Reprint of: ω-Lyndon words

    2020, Theoretical Computer Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    As with Lemma 2.1, we omit the proof as it is identical to that of Theorem 16 in [3]. The following lemma constitutes a generalisation of a characterisation of infinite Lyndon words given in [5] (see also Proposition 10 in [4]): We now turn to the question of unicity of ω-Lyndon factorisations for infinite words.

  • ω-Lyndon words

    2020, Theoretical Computer Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    As with Lemma 2.1, we omit the proof as it is identical to that of Theorem 16 in [3]. The following lemma constitutes a generalisation of a characterisation of infinite Lyndon words given in [5] (see also Proposition 10 in [4]): We now turn to the question of unicity of ω-Lyndon factorisations for infinite words.

  • Generalized Lyndon factorizations of infinite words

    2020, Theoretical Computer Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This follows directly from Theorems 9, 13, and 18. Siromoney et al. showed in [19] that the infinite Lyndon words are precisely the limits of prefix-preserving increasing sequences of finite Lyndon words. We show that this result still holds when Lyndon words are replaced with generalized Lyndon words provided that the infinite word is primitive.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text