A definition of relevance for information retrieval

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(71)90024-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The concept of “relevance”, sometimes also called “pertinence” or “aboutness”, is central to the theory of information retrieval. Unfortunately, however, there is at present no consensus as to how this notion should be defined. The purpose of this paper is to propose and defend a definition of what it means to say that a piece of stored information is “relevant” to the information need of a retrieval system user.

The suggested definition explicates relevance in terms of logical implication. For any yes-or-no question answering system which operates with one of the standard formalized languages, the definition provides a mathematically precise criterion of relevance. For other types of fact retrieval systems and reference retrieval systems, including all systems whose stored information is expressed in natural language, the definition is not mathematically precise but is nevertheless still helpful on a conceptual level.

References (19)

  • W. Goffman

    Inform. Star. Retr.

    (1964)
  • C.A. Cuadra et al.

    Experimental Studies of Relevance Judgments

  • A.M. Rees et al.

    A Field Experimental Approach to the Study of Relevance Assessments in Relation to Document Searching: Final Report

    (1967)
  • C.A. Cuadra

    On the Utility of the Relevance Concept

    (1964)
  • C.A. Cuadra et al.

    J. Docum.

    (1967)
  • A.M. Rees et al.

    The Measurability of Relevance

  • A.M. Rees
  • D.J. Hillman

    Am. Docum.

    (1964)
  • D.J. Hillman

    On Concept-Formation and Relevance

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (189)

  • Structural analysis of relevance propagation models

    2021, Knowledge-Based Systems
    Citation Excerpt :

    Relevance has traditionally been studied from a logical or philosophical perspective (e.g., [5]). Also, for years, the notion of relevance has been addressed from an information retrieval perspective (e.g., [6]). However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, relevance has never been analyzed from a topological perspective.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was carried out in part at the Institute of Library Research at the University of California under Office of Education grant OEG-1-7-071085-4256 (“An Information Processing Laboratory for Education and Research in Library Science”) and in part at the Graduate Library School of the University of Chicago under National Science Foundation grant GN-380 (“Studies in Indexing Depth and Retrieval Effectiveness”).

View full text