A decision theoretic approach to hierarchical classifier design

https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(84)90087-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The design of tree classifiers is considered from the statistical point of view. The procedure for calculating the a posteriori probabilities is decomposed into a sequence of steps. In every step the a posteriori probabilities for a certain subtask of the given pattern recognition task are calculated. The resulting tree classifier realizes a soft-decision strategy in contrast to the hard-decision strategy of the conventional decision tree. At the different nonterminal nodes, mean square polynomial classifiers are applied having the property of estimating the desired a posteriori probabilities together with an integrated feature selection capability.

References (19)

  • T.A. Bailey et al.

    Cluster validity profiles

    Pattern Recognition

    (1982)
  • P. Argentiero et al.

    An automated approach to the design of decision tree classifiers

    IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-4

    (1982)
  • A.V. Kulkarni et al.

    An optimization approach to hierarchical classifier design

  • J.K. Mui et al.

    Automated classification of nucleated blood cells using a binary tree classifier

    IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-2

    (1980)
  • E.M. Rounds

    A combined nonparametric approach to feature selection and binary decision tree design

  • H.J. Payne et al.

    An algorithm for constructing optimal binary decision trees

    IEEE Trans. Comput. C-26

    (1977)
  • I.K. Sethi et al.

    Hierarchical classifier design using mutual information

    IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-4

    (1982)
  • G.R. Dattatreya et al.

    Decision tree design for pattern recognition including feature measurement cost

  • W.W. Bledsoe et al.

    Discussion of problems in pattern recognition

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • A low-cost and efficient electronic nose system for quantification of multiple indoor air contaminants utilizing HC and PLSR

    2022, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, HC gives better classification results with fewer training samples than single complex classifiers [14], such as neural network and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier. Therefore, hierarchical classifier, based on the divide-and-conquer strategy, seems to be a good alternative for the classification of single and mixed gases [16]. Then, the concentration of single gases or individual components in mixture gases could be estimated utilizing neural network or multiple regression models.

  • Multiclass discriminant mappings

    1994, Signal Processing
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text