Scale changes and shared information in bargaining: An experimental study☆
References (12)
- et al.
Sociological versus strategic factors in bargaining
J. Econom. Behav. Organization
(1981) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: Interpersonal utility comparisons
Econometrica
(1977)- et al.
Disagreement in bargaining: An experimental study
J. Conflict Resolution
(1981) Coalitions in decision making groups
(1981)Two-person bargaining problems and comparable utility
Econometrica
(1977)The bargaining problem
Econometrica
(1950)
Cited by (7)
On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining
2020, Games and Economic BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Table 6 contains the coefficient estimates and it shows that productivity (number of eggs per hen) has a large significant negative effect on the bargaining outcome, and that the opponent's productivity has a significant positive effect of similar size. This finding is consistent with previous results that have identified a bias towards equal division distributions in unstructured bilateral bargaining environments (Nydegger and Owen, 1974; Roth and Malouf, 1979, 1982; Roth and Murnighan, 1982; Roth et al., 1981). One can also make pairwise treatment-to-treatment comparisons to explore this effect.29
What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games
2008, Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationAn experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining (By Werner Güth, Rolf Schmittberger, and Bernd Schwarze)
2021, The Art of Experimental Economics: Twenty Top Papers ReviewedInternational negotiations: A bibliography
2019, International Negotiations: A BibliographyValuating friends' privacy: Does anonymity of sharing personal data matter?
2019, Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2017Negotiator behavior and decision processes in dyads, groups, and markets
2015, Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings
- ☆
This work has been supported by National Science Foundation Grants No. SOC 78-09928 and No. SES 79-15356 to the University of Illinois. It is also a pleasure to acknowledge valuable advice from R.M. Harstad and J.K. Murnigham.