Conceptual citation differences in science, technology, and social sciences literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(87)90033-1Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined three disciplines and the literature to determine if there were any differences in conceptual referencing patterns. Physics, engineering, and sociology were examined using the actual literature of the disciplines for the year 1984. Samples were drawn from major abstracting and indexing services. A Dunn planned comparison approach was used to test for differences. The results of the testing indicated that physics, engineering, and sociology all differ in terms of conceptual references. Two sub-tests were performed on the data. Total number of references were examined, indicating no difference between physics and sociology, but distinct differences between physics and engineering and between sociology and engineering. The second sub-test examined the number of references to literature within a 5-year span of publication. This second test indicated differences between physics and sociology and between physics and engineering, but no difference between sociology and engineering. Suggestions for further study are offered.

References (16)

  • C.D. Hurt

    Methodological citation differences in science, technology, and social sciences literatures

    Library and Inf. Sci. Res.

    (1985)
  • M.J. Moravcsik et al.

    Some results on the function and quality of citations

    Social Studies of Sci.

    (1975)
  • P. Murugesan et al.

    Variation in the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties

    J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.

    (1978)
  • D. Price

    Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience

  • D.E. Chubin et al.

    Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?

    Social Studies of Sci.

    (1975)
  • S.K. Bertram

    The relationship between intra-document citation location and citation level

  • F. Narin et al.

    Bibliometrics

    Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. & Tech.

    (1976)
  • D. Edge

    Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review

    History of Sci.

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text