‘Citation profiles’ to improve relevance in a two-stage retrieval system: A proposal

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90042-CGet rights and content

Abstract

Individual differences in relevance judgements are not entirely erratic, and it is productive to consider citation profiles as a simple, convenient, and automatic method of reflecting the knowledge structure/past experience/viewpoints of the authors of papers. A citation profile is nothing but the list of citations appended to the paper. The list of references normally reflects a good sample of the complete or partial survey of that literature considered relevant by the author. Therefore, the source paper, together with its list of references, are to be kept together to provide a more complete picture of the ‘content’ and ‘structure’ of the document. The citation profile is believed to reflect the ‘state of knowing’ of the author, and higher commonality between the citation profile and the mental profile of a user would help improve a relevance decision. A mental profile is the state of knowing of the user, in terms of a set of documents known to the user as relevant. A step in the direction of designing and developing interactive, user-oriented, user-driven systems would be a two-stage information retrieval system where, in the first stage, a topical set of document representations would be produced by a Boolean search, and in the second stage, the citation profile of each document would be provided to the user, either in addition to or in lieu of abstracts.

References (32)

  • B. Boyce

    Beyond topicality: A two stage view of relevance and the retrieval process

    Information Processing and Management

    (1982)
  • W.S. Cooper

    On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1973)
  • M.E. Maron

    Associative search techniques versus probabilistic retrieval models

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1982)
  • I.U. Schreider

    On the semantic characteristics of information

    Information Storage and Retrieval

    (1965)
  • V. Bar-Hillel

    Relatedness and relevance

    Proc. Int. Conf. Scient. Inf.

    (1958)
    D.J. Hillman

    The notion of relevance

    American Documentation

    (1964)
  • T. Bellardo

    An investigation of online searcher traits and their relationship to search outcome

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1985)
  • N.J. Belkin

    Information concepts for information science

    Journal of Documentation

    (1978)
  • N.J. Belkin et al.

    ASK for information retrieval. Part I: Background and theory

    Journal of Documentation

    (1982)
  • C.L. Borgman

    All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences

    Information Processing and Management

    (1989)
  • W.S. Cooper et al.

    Foundations of probabilistic and utility—Theoretic indexing

    Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery

    (1978)
  • D. Davidson

    The effects of individual difference of Cognitive style on judgements of document relevance

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1977)
  • R.M. Fano

    The notion of relevance

    American Documentation

    (1964)
  • C.H. Fenichel

    Online searching: Measures that discriminate among users with different types of experiences

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1981)
  • N. Ford

    Relating information needs to learner characteristics in higher education

    Journal of Documentation

    (1980)
  • W. Goffman

    An indirect method of information retrieval

    Information Storage and Retrieval

    (1968)
  • H.J. Hall

    Patterns in the use of information: the right to be different

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science

    (1981)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text