Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-189X(85)90032-5Get rights and content

Abstract

When normally sighted people observe a natural scene, their perceptions include seeing the supporting ground surface and the arrangements of the objects on that surface: where each object is in relation to the others, to the ground surface, and to the observer. This is defined as the perceived layout of a scene. Most current perceptual theories do not consider perceived layout, preferring to focus on the much narrower concern of perceived radial distance of objects from the observer, ignoring concern for the relationships among the objects of the scene, and among the observer in relation to the objects. In contrast, current cognitive theories have focused on cognitive maps as a spatial representation of scenes previously seen, maps which include explicit representation of spatial layout. However, cognitive theories have paid little theoretical attention to the spatial relationships in scenes currently on view, so they can tell us little about perceived layout, only remembered layout. Perceived layout has been missing from perceptual theories, and needs to be studied in its own right. In addition, to understand spatial cognition, cognitive maps, or any kind of representation of knowledge about the layout of space, we must study the properties of perceived layout—the perception of the arrangements of objects in a scene currently on view. To provide an example of the assessment of perceived layout, experimental data are presented on the psychophysical measurement of the perceived layout of a natural scene containing 13 objects arranged on a large flat lawn. Subjects are asked to draw a map of the scene, to estimate the absolute interobjects distances between every pair of objects in feet, and to compare the relative magnitudes of every possible triplet of interobject distances. The matrices of the interobject distances derived from each of these three measures produce highly reliable and consistent 2-dimensional constructions of the scene through a multi-dimensional scaling analysis. These constructions resemble the physical layout of the actual scene quite closely. However, subjects tend to underestimate the distances between objects when the direction of the distances are parallel to their line of sight, compared to directions perpendicular to their line of sight. Not only does this tend to produce perceived layouts of the scene that are slightly more ellipical than in actuality, but more important, it means that subjects' perceived layouts change when they move to new viewing positions. These analyses and others are used to examine the usefulness and validity of these measures as indices of perceived layout. Following the psychophysical descriptions of the measures, as theoretical analysis of some of the properties of the perceived layout of space is provided, along with a consideration of some of the variables that are expected to affect these properties. The paper concludes with a return to the theoretical issues concerning the contents of a proper theory of space perception.

References (132)

  • J. D. Carrol and J. J. Chang, Analysis of individual differences in multi-dimensional scaling via an n-way...
  • F.E Goodson et al.

    Motion parallax in the perception of movement by a moving subject

    Bull. Psychon. Soc.

    (1980)
  • W Hell et al.

    Detectability of motion as a factor in depth perception by monocular movement parallax

    Percept. and Psychophys.

    (1977)
  • P Arbie et al.

    Multidimensional scaling of measures of distance between partitions

    J. Math. Psychol.

    (1973)
  • F Attneave

    Dimensions of similarity

    Amer. J. Psychol.

    (1950)
  • H.G Barrow et al.

    Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from imagex

  • D.R Baum et al.

    Cognitive maps: Analysis of comparative judgments of distance

    Mem. and Cognit.

    (1979)
  • J.K Bengston et al.

    Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures

    J. Exp. Psychol., Human Percept. and Perform.

    (1980)
  • I Biederman

    On the semantics of a glance at a scene

  • I Biederman

    Do background depth gradients facilitate object identification?

    Perception

    (1981)
  • J.A Brabyn et al.

    Computer-analysed measures of characteristics of human locomotion and mobility

    Behav. Res. Methods and Instrum.

    (1977)
  • D.R Bradley et al.

    Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered distance

    Perception

    (1984)
  • M Brady

    Computer Vision

    (1982)
    M Brady

    Artif. Intell.

    (1982)
  • M.L Braunstein et al.

    Velocity gradients and relative depth perception

    Percept. & Psychophys.

    (1981)
  • J.F Brown et al.

    The path of seen movement as a function of the vector-field

    American J. Psychol.

    (1937)
  • R.W Byrne et al.

    Distances and directions in the cognitive map of the blind

    Can. J. Psychol.

    (1983)
  • F.W Campbell et al.

    The tilt after-effect: A fresh look

    Vision Res.

    (1971)
  • J. A. Da Silva and A. Dos Santos, The effects of instructions on scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large...
  • J.B Davidson

    Differences in Visual Perception: The Individual Eye

    (1975)
  • D Degelman et al.

    Motion parallax and children's distance perception

    Dev. Psychol.

    (1979)
  • E De Renzi

    Disorders of Space Exploration and Cognition

    (1982)
  • R.F Dillon et al.

    Individual Differences in Cognition

    (1983)
  • H Dolezal

    Living in a World Transformed: Perceptual and Performatory Adaptation to Visual Distortion

    (1982)
  • W Epstein

    The Stability of Visual Perception

    (1977)
  • W Epstein et al.

    Examination of Gibson's psychophysical hypothesis

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1964)
  • E.S Eriksson

    Movement parallax during locomotion

    Percept. and Psychophys.

    (1974)
  • J.M Farber et al.

    Optical motions as information for unsigned depth

    J. Exper. Psychol., Human Percept. and Perform.

    (1979)
  • J.A Feldman

    Four frames suffice: A provisional model of vision and space

    Behav. and Brain Sci.

    (1985)
  • S.H Ferris

    Motion parallax and absolute distance

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1972)
  • H Fitch et al.

    On the control of activity: Some remarks from an ecological point of view

  • J.E Foley et al.

    Mental mapping of a megastructure

    Can. J. Psychol.

    (1984)
  • J.M Foley

    Binocular distance perception

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1980)
  • J.M Foley et al.

    visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction and available cues

    Percept. and Psychophys.

    (1972)
  • E.J Gibson et al.

    Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1954)
  • J.J Gibson

    The Perception of the Visual World

    (1950)
  • J.J Gibson

    On the analysis of change in the optic array

    Scand. J. Psychol.

    (1977)
  • J.J Gibson

    The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

    (1979)
  • J.J Gibson et al.

    Does motion perspective independently produce the impressing of a receding surface?

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1952)
  • J.J Gibson et al.

    A method for controlling stimulation for the study of space perception: The optical tunnel

    J. Exp. Psych.

    (1955)
  • A.S Gilinsky

    Perceived size and distance in visual space

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1951)
  • W.C Gogel

    The Visual Perception of Spatial Extent

    FAA-CARI document No. 63-20, Oklahoma City

    (Sept. 1963)
  • W.C Gogel

    cognitive factors in spatial responses

    Psychologica

    (1974)
  • W.C Gogel

    An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size

    Percept. and Psychophys.

    (1976)
  • W.C Gogel et al.

    Depth adjacency and induced motion

    Percept. and Motor Skills

    (1979)
  • W.C Gogel et al.

    Perceived depth between familiar objects

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1968)
  • W.C Gogel et al.

    Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency

    Percept. & Psychophy.

    (1973)
  • W.C Gogel et al.

    A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance

    Vision Res.

    (1979)
  • C.H Graham et al.

    Factors influencing thresholds for monocular movement parallax

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1948)
  • W.L Gulick et al.

    Human Stereopsis

    (1976)
  • J Gyr et al.

    Motor-sensory feedback and geometry of visual space: An attempted replication

    Behav. and Brain Sci.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Picture processing: 1985.

      1986, Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing
    • Visual Space Perception and Visually Directed Action

      1992, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    • Transformation Theory of Size Judgment

      1991, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text