Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 35, Issue 4, April 1999, Pages 729-734
Automatica

Technical Communique
Approximation of frequency response for sampled-data control systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00206-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper proves that the frequency response gains of fast-sample/fast-hold approximations of a sampled-data system converge to that of the original system as the sampling rate gets faster. While this may appear to hold trivially, there is a serious technical difficulty, and the proof is indeed nontrivial. It is also guaranteed that this convergence is uniform on the total frequency range. The latter property is necessary to guarantee that a single approximant can be used for frequency response computation for the overall frequency range.

References (0)

Cited by (56)

  • H<inf>∞</inf> and H<inf>2</inf> optimal sampled-data controller synthesis: A hybrid systems approach with mixed discrete/continuous specifications

    2021, Automatica
    Citation Excerpt :

    High performance is warranted by taking a sufficiently high sampling frequency, see, e.g., Chen and Francis (1995) and Skogestad and Postlethwaite (2007), while it is of interest to select low sampling/update frequencies, when computation/communication resources are limited. Extensive research has been done on the topic of sampled-data controller synthesis for linear systems in the last few decades, see, e.g., Bamieh and Pearson (1992), Chen and Francis (1995), Dai et al. (2010), Fridman (2014), Fridman et al. (2005), Geromel et al. (2019), Ichikawa and Katayama (2001), Khargonekar and Sivashankar (1991), Lall and Dullerud (2001), Mirkin and Palmor (1997, 2003), Sivashankar and Khargonekar (1994), Toivonen (1992) and Yamamoto et al. (1999), when focussing on linear systems. The aforecited papers can be categorised into “lifting” approaches, fast-sampling/fast-hold approaches, time-delay approaches and jump/hybrid systems approaches.

  • Periodic disturbance rejection to the Nyquist frequency and beyond

    2018, Control Engineering Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    When the sampling frequency is not sufficiently high, unobservable oscillations or ripples of the controlled variable occurring between samples can degrade the performance or even destabilize the closed-loop control system (Atsumi & Messner, 2012). Since 1990s, researchers started to study the built-in intersample behavior for sampled-data systems (Araki, Ito, & Hagiwara, 1996; Bamieh & Pearson, 1992; Chen & Francis, 1995; Yamamoto, 1994), and many techniques have been proposed (Hagiwara & Okada, 2009), e.g. the lifting technique see Bamieh and Pearson (1992), Bittanti and Colaneri (2009), Hara, Fujioka, Khargonekar, and Yamamoto (1996), Mirkin and Palmor (2002), Toivonen (1992), Yamamoto (1994) and Yamamoto and Khargonekar (1996), the FR-operator technique see Araki et al. (1996) and Hagiwara and Araki (1995), the fast-sample/fast-hold approximation see Hagiwara and Okada (2009) and Yamamoto, Madievski, and Anderson (1999), as well as the methods in Chen and Qiu (1997), Goodwin and Salgado (1994), Hagiwara, Suyama, and Araki (2001), Ito, Hagiwara, Maeda, and Araki (2001), Jia (2005) and Kim and Hagiwara (2015). Various approaches for periodic disturbance rejection have been proposed during the past few decades, such as the phase-locked loop technique-based adaptive methods (Bodson & Douglas, 1997; Bodson, Sacks, & Khosla, 1994), the internal model principle (Brown & Zhang, 2004; Kim, Kim, Chung, & Tomizuka, 2011), and the repetitive control (Hara, Yamamoto, Omata, & Nakano, 1988).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This paper was not presented at any IFAC meeting. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Editor Peter Dorato. This author was supported in part by the Sound Technology Promotion Foundation.

1

The second and third authors wish to acknowledge the funding of the activities of the Cooperative Research Center for Robust and Adaptive Systems by the Australian Commonwealth Government under the Cooperative Research Centres Program. The second author was previously at the address of the third author.

View full text