Expertise transfer and complex problems: using AQUINAS as a knowledge-acquisition workbench for knowledge-based systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80032-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Acquiring knowledge from a human expert is a major problem when building a knowledge-based system. Aquinas, an expanded version of the Expertise Transfer System (ETS), is a knowledge-acquisition workbench that combines ideas from psychology and knowledge-based systems research to support knowledge-acquisition tasks. These tasks include eliciting distinctions, decomposing problems, combining uncertain information, incremental testing, integration of data types, automatic expansion and refinement of the knowledge base, use of multiple sources of knowledge and providing process guidance. Aquinas interviews experts and helps them analyse, test, and refine the knowledge base. Expertise from multiple experts or other knowledge sources can be represented and used separately or combined. Results from user consultations are derived from information propagated through hierarchies. Aquinas delivers knowledge by creating knowledge bases for several different expert-system shells. Help is given to the expert by a dialog manager that embodies knowledge-acquisition heuristics.

Aquinas contains many techniques and tools for knowledge acquisition; the techniques combine to make it a powerful testbed for rapidly prototyping portions of many kinds of complex knowledge-based systems.

References (58)

  • J.H. Boose

    A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology

    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

    (1985)
  • G. Shafer et al.

    Languages and designs for probability judgment

    Cognitive Science

    (1985)
  • J. Adams

    Probabilistic reasoning and certainty factors

  • M. Alpert et al.

    A progress report on the training of probability assessors

  • D. Antonelli

    The application of artificial intelligence to a maintenance and diagnostic information system (MDIS)

  • M. Benda et al.

    Boeing blackboard system

  • Benda, M., Jagannathan, V. & Dodhiawala, R., On optimal cooperation of knowledge sources. Workshop on Distributed...
  • R. Beyth-Marom et al.
  • J.H. Boose

    Personal construct theory and the transfer of human expertise

  • J.H. Boose
  • J.H. Boose

    Rapid acquisition and combination of knowledge from multiple experts in the same domain

  • D.E. Brown

    Expert systems for design problem-solving using design refinement with plan selection and redesign

  • T. Bylander et al.

    Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: the “Right,” level of abstraction for knowledge acquisition

  • T. Bylander et al.

    CSRL: a language for classificatory problem solving and uncertainty handling

    AI Magazine

    (1986)
  • B. Chandrasekaran

    Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: high-level building blocks for expert system design

    IEEE Expert

    (1986)
  • P. Cheeseman

    In defense of probability

  • W. Clancey

    Heuristic classification

  • C.H. Coombs et al.
  • L. Eshelman et al.

    MOLE: a tenacious knowledge-acquisition tool

  • B.R. Gaines

    An overview of knowledge acquisition and transfer

    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

    (1987)
  • B.R. Gaines et al.

    New directions in the analysis and interactive elicitation of personal construct systems

  • B.R. Gaines et al.

    Induction of inference rules for expert systems

    Fuzzy Sets and Systems

    (1985)
  • J. Gordon et al.

    The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence

  • T. Gruber et al.

    Design for acquisition principles of knowledge system design to facilitate knowledge acquisition

    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

    (1987)
  • M. Henrion

    Propagating uncertainty by logic sampling in Bayes' networks

  • D.N. Hinkle

    The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of implications

  • R.A. Howard et al.

    Influence diagrams

  • R. Hurley
  • G. Kahn et al.

    MORE: an intelligent knowledge acquisition tool

  • Cited by (164)

    • A questioning based method to automatically acquire expert assembly diagnostic knowledge

      2014, CAD Computer Aided Design
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, the KBDT system [23] takes in an initial set of vocabulary terms, acronyms and euphemisms, and works with examples to elicit design rationale. An early system ACQUINAS [24] also looks at knowledge for configuring systems using rating grids, and again uses examples—but this is applicable for domains with a prior, clear, domain model. Another research effort that targets similar objectives uses Fuzzy Cognitive Models [25] as the framework for modeling diagnostic knowledge.

    • User expertise in contemporary information systems: Conceptualization, measurement and application

      2013, Information and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, numerous studies have identified that knowledge sharing is an essential part of knowledge management, and it is imperative to ES success [e.g. 99, 100]. Studies of several disciplines; IS [e.g. 101, 102], business [e.g. 103], and psychology [e.g. 104, 105, 106]; suggest that experts, are willing, able and motivated to convey their superior knowledge and skills to novices. The test of the structural model includes estimates of the path coefficient, which indicate the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variable, and the R2 values, which represent the amount of variance explained by the independent variable/s. Together, the R2 and the path coefficient (loadings and significance) indicate how well the data supports the hypothesized model [91].

    • From knowledge science to symbiosis science

      2013, International Journal of Human Computer Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      In 1985, Brian Gaines produced an early version of a diagram predicting the future of knowledge systems, and showing Wisdom as the pinnacle of that evolution (Fig. 1). Four years later, I was honored to join Brian, along with my mentor and friend John Boose (Boose, 1986; Boose and Bradshaw, 1987; Bradshaw and Boose, 1990; Bradshaw et al., 1991; Shema et al., 1990), in sending out a call for papers for a Workshop on Wisdom-Based Systems that was to take place on June 22–24, 1989 at the Rosario Resort on Orcas Island in Washington state. Here is a paragraph from that call:

    • Failure analysis expert system for onshore pipelines. Part - I: Structured database and knowledge acquisition

      2011, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      These techniques have been developed to help DE the reason about his expertise, and the KE to understand it. Some of the techniques mainly for data extraction are: Repertory Grid Analysis (RGA); (Boose, 1985; Gaines & Shaw, 1980), and its derivations, such as VODKA (Tseng & Lin, 2009); KAMET (Chu & Hwang, 2008), ETS (Boose, 1985), AQUINAS (Boose & Bradshaw, 1986); KITTEN (Shaw & Gaines, 1987) and others. Machine Learning Approach: In this case, the knowledge approximation from domain examples provided by the experts and using software with learning algorithms, for example ID3 (Quinlan, 1986) and AQ11 (Michalski & Chilausky, 1980) which are two well-known commercial learning algorithms.

    • VODKA: Variant objects discovering knowledge acquisition

      2009, Expert Systems with Applications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text