DRAM reliability

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00030-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) reliability is investigated for future DRAMs where small geometrical devices are used together with new materials and novel process technologies. Among the several items of DRAM reliability, the most important aspect to consider for DRAM reliability is infant mortality which is caused by process-induced defects including random defects. Since the process-induced defects are strongly dependent on process technology, it is inevitable to minimize process-induced defects by developing new process technology. However, whenever new process technology is introduced, new screening techniques or methods are necessary for suppressing infant mortality. The degradation of pMOSFET due to buried-channel pMOSFET during burn-in stress and soft error rate due to α-particle and cosmic ray irradiation become concerns as device dimension shrinks. However, it cannot be limitations of DRAM reliability because pMOSFET degradation due to hot electron induced puchthrough can be suppressed by new layout of pMOSFET, and the soft error events can be overcome by soft error resistant device structure and proper material choices. From these considerations, it can be expected that the advances of DRAM technology generation not only improve the device performance but also enhance the reliability.

Introduction

Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) has advantages of realizing high density due to its simple cell structure of 1T1C (one transistor one capacitor). The density of DRAM has been approximately quadrupled every three years by virtue of advances of DRAM technology. As a result, 256 Mb DRAM is now in full production mode with 0.15 μm DRAM technology generation, 512 Mb DRAM is now in pre-production mode with 0.13 μm DRAM technology node, and sub-0.13 μm DRAM technology is under development in R&D center.

As the device dimension decreases, short channel effect (SCE) becomes much serious. In order to reduce the SCE, complementary metal oxide silicon (CMOS) technology is driven for developing shallow junction, thin gate oxide, halo source/drain implantation and high channel doping. At the same time, thinner metal width with design rule shrinkage results in higher current density [1], [2]. All of these are detrimental to reliability such as oxide quality, hot carrier effect, electrostatic discharge, latch up, metal electro-migration, and so on. The silicon devices fabricated with CMOS technology whether they are logic devices or memory devices, cannot be free from most of these issues.

Since DRAM is composed of memory cell array where bits of 1T1C are formed with two-dimensional matrix, and peripheral area where CMOS control circuit and random logic are formed, reliability of DRAM is determined by both memory cell array and CMOS periphery. The reliability of DRAM due to CMOS periphery can be shared with that of typical CMOS periphery and it has not been a primary concern in DRAM reliability because relaxed CMOS design rule has been used in DRAM periphery. Hence, the reliability of DRAM has been governed by the memory arrays where smallest physical dimension is always used together with highest applied voltage. As the DRAM technology generation enters sub-0.13 μm node, many challenges emerge from not only reliability aspects but also technological aspects. The challenges from technological aspects are well studied, and their solutions for challenges are under development [3], [4]. On the other hand, the challenges from reliability aspects have not been properly studied, even though they are essential for commercial products. In this paper, the reliability of DRAM, mainly determined by the memory cell, will be discussed, and it will be predicted for future scaled down DRAMs.

The origins of DRAM reliability can be categorized into three critical failures. The first is the field failure (failure during operation by customer) induced by defects such as word line-bit line leakage or capacitor dielectric leakage current [5]. The second is the failure induced by electrical or temperature stress [6]. The last is the failure induced by soft error event from α-particle and cosmic ray radiation effect [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Reliability problems induced by defects are mostly related with infant mortality, which is the most important in DRAM reliability. The failures induced by electrical or temperature stress are important for estimating useful lifetime and determining burn-in condition to guarantee a device lifetime. The soft error rate (SER) is important in space-applications such as satellite and spacecraft and it will be more important in future because of more prevalent applications of space.

Another important topic in DRAM reliability is a screening procedure. Most of failure due to infant mortality can be screened out by wafer burn-in or package burn-in tests [12], [13]. In this paper, three key reliability aspects of DRAM reliability such as infant mortality, device life time and soft error will be discussed with screening methods of those items.

Section snippets

Test and screening

Reliability failure rates of silicon devices are known to show the bath-tub curve behavior as a function of field test time [14]. The bath-tub curve can be categorized into three key regions such as infant mortality, useful life and wear out. The wear out has not been concerned in semiconductor devices and it will not be problems in future silicon devices because semiconductor devices are always designed, manufactured and tested with wide margins over the specified device lifetime which is

Infant mortality failure

Most of the infant mortality failures are caused by process defects. If the number of defects is constant, the total cumulative yield will increase as the design rule shrinks and the number of chip increases. However, this is not the universal law, because the defect size to cause failure decreases as the design rule shrinks. Therefore, process innovation and new screening tests must be inevitably accompanied with new device to get rid of the smaller process defects and screen the defects. It

Stress induced failure (transistor off-state leakage current failure)

As notified in previous section, the burn-in screening is inevitable in DRAM. However, the highly accelerated stress condition during burn-in stress might cause other unwanted failures due to the inherent natures of DRAM. Recently we observed an unwanted stress induced failure, which is the hot electron induced pMOSFET leakage current. Even though both nMOSFET and pMOSFET suffer hot carrier stress during the operation, pMOSFET is more susceptible to hot electron induced punchthrough (HEIP) than

Radiation effects

SER is another reliability concern in advanced memory devices such as for aircraft and satellite. Radiation can induce soft error event by impact ionization. One of radiation sources is α-particle from package materials, and the other is neutron from cosmic rays. The SER is closely related with many parameters such as CMOS well structure, fabrication material, and design rule. The effects of these parameters are investigated here.

Conclusion

As scaling down proceeds, interdielectric leakage from undesirable particles and defects become important, which can be reduced by innovations of technology and optimum screening test condition. When new device is developed, new technology should be provided together with well-tuned deposition condition and optimized cleaning to assure the crucial infant mortality for reliability. The remaining problems can be eliminated with proper wafer test and burn-in screening to raise the total cumulative

References (29)

  • K. Kim

    DRAM technology perspective for stand-alone and embedded applications (invited paper)

    Microelectronics Reliability

    (2000)
  • A.G. Sabnis et al.

    A physical model for degradation of drams during accelerated stress aging

    21st Annual Proceedings International Reliability Physics Symposium

    (1983)
  • J.R. Black

    Electromigration—a brief survey and some recent results

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (1969)
  • K. Kim et al.

    DRAM technology perspective for giga-bit era (invited paper)

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (1998)
  • D. Park et al.

    Stress-induced current comparison of giga-bit scale DRAM capacitors with OCS node

    IRW Final Report

    (2000)
  • J.-k. Lee et al.

    Investigation of pMOSFET hot electron induced punch through (HEIP) in shallow trench isolation

    European Solid State Device Research Conference

    (2000)
  • B. Prince

    Semiconductor memories

    (1991)
  • T.C. May et al.

    Alpha-particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (1979)
  • C.M. Hsieh et al.

    A field-funneling effect on the collection of alpha-particle-generated carriers in silicon devices

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev Lett

    (1981)
  • T.J. O'Gorman

    The effect of cosmic rays on the soft error rate of a DRAM at ground level

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (1994)
  • L.Z. Scheick et al.

    Analysis of radiation effects on individual DRAM cells

    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci

    (2000)
  • M.W. Ruprecht et al.

    Is product screen enough to guarantee low failure rate for the customer

    IEEE 39th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium

    (2001)
  • T. Furuyama et al.

    Wafer burn-in technology for RAM's

    Electron Devices Meeting, 1993. Technical Digest, International

    (1993)
  • A. Christou

    Integrating reliability into microelectronics manufacturing

    (1994)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Correctable and uncorrectable errors using large scale DRAM DIMMs in replacement network servers

      2019, Microelectronics Reliability
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, case studies of DRAM errors at the system level are very rare and few studies have investigated DRAM errors using large scale field data. DRAM errors have been collected from servers [3,16] and Internet server farms [13] and soft error focused experiments have also been performed [17–19]. Previous studies [3,16] showed that CE and UE appearances are not entirely independent.

    • Reliability Issues: Reliability Imposed Limits to Scaling

      2018, Handbook of Thin Film Deposition: Fourth Edition
    • Degradation of pMOSFETs due to hot electron induced punchthrough

      2016, Microelectronics Reliability
      Citation Excerpt :

      When hot electrons are trapped in the gate oxide, they decrease effective channel length and induce a hot-electron-induced punchthrough (HEIP) in a short channel pMOSFET. Thereby, HEIP increases OFF-state leakage current significantly and induces standby current failure of DRAM [8–11]. The amount of hot electron injection into the gate dielectric is proportional to the gate current Ig [12].

    • Experiments and root cause analysis for active-precharge hammering fault in DDR3 SDRAM under 3 × nm technology

      2016, Microelectronics Reliability
      Citation Excerpt :

      To achieve manufacturing economics, the process technology is continuously shrinking down. However, shrinking the geometrical size causes cells to be closer together than previously which leads to the reliability problem of DRAM [2]. This, in turn, causes neighboring cells to be more easily influenced by each other and may lead to effects such as retention time reduction.

    • Process engineering to reduce self-aligned contact failure by reducing process-driven thermal stress on tungsten-dual poly gate stacks in sub-60 nm DRAM devices

      2012, Microelectronic Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The gate sheet resistance (Rs) has to be high because of the reduced W width in the gate stack. In particular, the high aspect ratio in highly scaled devices (gate half pitch less than 70 nm) results in self-aligned contact failure (SAC) during the landing plug contact (LPC) process in the package reliability tests, which is attributed to the short circuit between the leaned gate word line and the LPC plug poly-Si [7]. In this paper, we describe the mechanism of failure in detail based on various analyses of the material and physical properties of electrodes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text