Least-squares Galerkin procedures for parabolic integro-differential equations

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00304-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Two least-squares Galerkin finite element schemes are formulated to solve parabolic integro-differential equations. The advantage of this method is that it is not subject to the LBB condition. The convergence analysis shows that the least-squares mixed element schemes yield the approximate solution with optimal accuracy in H(div;Ω)×H1(Ω) and (L2(Ω))2×L2(Ω), respectively.

Introduction

We consider the following integro-differential equation of parabolic type:c(x)uta(x)u+b(x)∫0tu(x,τ)dτ+qu=f(x,t),inΩ×Ju(x,t)|ΓD×J=0,a(x)u+b(x)∫0tu(x,τ)dτ·ν(x)|ΓN×J=0,u(x,0)=u0(x),where J=(0,T) is the time interval, Ω is a bounded polygonal domain in R2 with a Lipschitz continuous boundary Γ. Γ=ΓDΓN and ν is the unit vector normal to ΓN. q=q(x)⩾0 and f=f(x,t) in (1.1) are given functions. We shall make the following assumptions on the coefficients c, a and b: there exist positive constants k1, k2 and a, a such that0<k1⩽c(x)⩽k2,0<a⩽a(x)⩽a,|b(x)|⩽k2.

Problem (1.1) can arise from many physical processes in which it is necessary to take into account the effects of memory due to the deficiency of the usual diffusion equations. For example, it can serve as a model in some gas diffusion problems [1] and in some heat transfer problems with memory [2]. For linear or nonlinear integro-differential equations, the standard finite element methods have received considerable attention and are well studied. See, for example, [3], [4], [5]. Recently, mixed methods to approximate such problems have been formulated in [6].

The disadvantage of the mixed element method is that the LBB condition must be satisfied by the finite element spaces. In this paper, we propose and analyze the least-squares Galerkin finite element method for parabolic integro-differential equations. The advantage of this method is that it is not subject to the LBB condition, so we can select the finite element spaces without constrains. We formulate two novel numerical methods and give the optimal convergent rates in H(div;Ω)×H1(Ω) and (L2(Ω))2×L2(Ω) norms, respectively.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we formulate two least-squares Galerkin finite element procedures. The convergence theory on these algorithms is established in Section 3.

Throughout this paper, the symbols K and δ are used to denote a generic constant and a generic small positive constant, respectively. We also use the usual definitions and notations of Sobolev spaces as in [7].

Section snippets

Least-squares Galerkin finite element procedures

Let Wk,p(k⩾0,1⩽p⩽∞) be Sobolev spaces defined on Ω with usual norms ∥·∥Wk,p(Ω) and Hk(Ω)=Wk,2(Ω). Define inner products and spaces as follows.(u,v)=∫Ωuvdx∀u,v∈L2(Ω),(σ,ω)=∑i=12ii)∀σ=(σ12),ω=(ω12)∈L2(Ω)2.H={w∈L2(Ω)2;divw∈L2(Ω),ω·ν=0onΓN},S={v∈H1(Ω),v=0onΓD}.Given a time step Δt=T/N, where N is a positive integer, we shall approximate the solution at times tn=nΔt, n=0,1,…,N.

Let Thσ and Thu be two families of finite element partitions of the domain Ω, which are identical or not, hσ and hu

Convergence analysis

In this section, we analyze the convergence of the two procedures. First we analyze Scheme I.

Combining , , we obtainaN((σn−σnh,un−unh),(ψh,vh))=1c(c(un−1−un−1h)+ΔtRn1),cvh+Δt(divψh+qvh)+Δta(x)−1Rn2Δtb(x)∑i=0n−1(ui−uih)(x)h+a(x)vh∀(ψh,vh)∈Hhσ×Shu.

Let θn=Rununh, ρn=unRun, πn=nσnh, ϵn=σnn. The estimates for ρn and ϵn were given in , , we need to estimate θn and πn. From (3.1) we see that (πn,θn) satisfies the following error equation:1c(c(θn+Δt(divπn+qθn)),cvh)+Δt(divψh+qvh)+Δt(a(x)−1

Acknowledgements

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant no. 10071044 and the Research Fund for Doctoral Program of High Education by State Education Ministry of China.

References (9)

  • M. Raynal

    On some nonlinear problems of diffusion

  • M. Gurtin et al.

    A general theory of heat conduction with finite wave speeds

    Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.

    (1968)
  • J.R. Cannon et al.

    A priori L2 error estimates for finite element methods for nonlinear diffusion equations with memory

    SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

    (1990)
  • J.R. Cannon et al.

    Non-classical H1 projection and Galerkin methods for nonlinear parabolic integro-differential equations

    Calcolo

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • A new expanded mixed method for parabolic integro-differential equations

    2015, Applied Mathematics and Computation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Parabolic integro-differential equations are a class of very important evolution equations which describe many physical phenomena such as heat conduction in material with memory, compression of viscoelastic media, nuclear reactor dynamics, etc. In recent years, a lot of scholars have studied the numerical methods for parabolic integro-differential equations, such as finite element methods [1–4], mixed finite element methods [5–10], finite volume element method [11] and so forth. There exists a unique discrete solution to semi-discrete scheme (2.3).

  • A remark on least-squares mixed element methods for reaction-diffusion problems

    2007, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
  • A class of developed schemes for parabolic integro-differential equations

    2021, International Journal of Computer Mathematics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text