Permanence in nonautonomous Lotka–Volterra system with predator–prey
Introduction
We consider the nonautonomous predator–prey Lotka–Volterra system of the differential equationswhere xi(t) and yj(t) denote the density of prey species Xi and predator species Yj, respectively; bi(t), γj(t), aik(t), cil(t), djk(t) and ejl(t), (i,k=1,…,n; j,l=1,…,m), i.e., the coefficients of system (1.1) are bounded and continuous functions defined on [c,+∞); γj(t), aik(t), cil(t), djk(t) and ejl(t), (i,k=1,…,n; j,l=1,…,m) are nonnegative on [c,+∞). In addition to predator–prey relation, there are also competition among predator species Yj and among prey species Xi in system (1.1).
The competitive Lotka–Volterra system has been studied in many papers, for example papers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and [11]. Some sufficient conditions are obtained for permanence, global attractivity and extinction in this system. But there are a fewer papers on system (1.1). Yang and Xu [9] studied τ-periodic system (1.1), i.e., the coefficients of system (1.1) are continuous periodic functions with a common period τ>0. Under the assumptions that the coefficients are nonnegative and some of them are strictly positive, they obtained sufficient conditions for existence, uniqueness and global attractivity of the strictly positive τ-periodic solution of the τ-periodic system (1.1). Zhao and Chen [10] considered τ-periodic system (1.1) and obtained the same results under certain sufficient conditions and the assumptions that , other coefficients are as in [9]. It is shown that paper [10] is a generalization of [9] in some sense.
In this paper, we shall study the general nonautonomous predator–prey Lotka–Volterra system (1.1) and give sufficient conditions for permanence and global attractivity in system (1.1).
First we give some notations and definitions. Given a function g(t) which is defined on [c,+∞), we setAccording to Ahmad and Lazer [3], we define the lower and upper averages of a function g(t) which is continuous and bounded on [c,+∞). If c⩽t1<t2 we setThe lower and upper averages of g(t), denoted by m[g] and M[g], respectively, are defined byandSince the set gets smaller as s increases, the limits exist; and since gl⩽A[g,t1,t2]⩽gu, it follows thatAssume thatSystem (1.1) is called permanent, if there exist strictly positive reals δ, Δ and T0>c such that δ⩽xi(t)⩽Δ, i=1,…,n, and δ⩽yj(t)⩽Δ, j=1,…,m, for any strictly positive solution col(x1(t),…,xn(t),y1(t),…,ym(t)) of (1.1) as t>T0. System (1.1) is said to be globally attractive, if there exists a strictly positive solution col(x1(t),…,xn(t),y1(t),…,ym(t)) of (1.1) such that limt→+∞(ui(t)−xi(t))=0 for i=1,…,n, and limt→+∞(vj(t)−yj(t))=0 for j=1,…,m, where col(u1(t),…,un(t),v1(t),…,vm(t)) is any other strictly positive solution of (1.1).
In the following we shall give average conditions for permanence and global attractivity in system (1.1). In Section 2, some basic results on logistic equation are obtained. In Section 3, we give our main results on system (1.1). It is show that our results are generalization of those of the τ-periodic logistic equation and τ-periodic system (1.1).
Section snippets
Basic results on logistic equation
For the logistic equationthe following Lemma 2.1 is well known: Lemma 2.1 Ifbi(t) andaii(t) are continuous functions bounded above and below by strictly positive reals on [c,+∞), then(2.1)has a unique solution which is bounded above and below by strictly positive reals for allt∈[c,+∞) and globally attractive. Proof See Ahmad [1, Lemma 3] for existence of the unique solution which is bounded above and below by strictly positive reals for all t∈[c,+∞). The proof of globalAhmad [1, Lemma 3]
Permanence and global attractivity
By the analysis below we get our main results on system (1.1). From the first equation of (1.1) we have thatIf (A1) and (A2) hold, then by the differential inequality theorem and Lemma 2.2 we have that for a sufficient small ε1>0 there exists a T1>t0 such that for t>T1where is any solution of Eq. (3.1) with for some t0∈[c,+∞),Let . Then by Lemma 2.2 we
References (11)
- et al.
Necessary and sufficient average growth in a Lotka–Volterra system
Nonlinear Anal.
(1998) - et al.
Average conditions for global asymptotic stability in a nonautonomous Lotka–Volterra system
Nonlinear Anal.
(2000) On the asymptotic behavior of some population model
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1992)An iterative scheme for the N-competing species problem
J. Differential Equations
(1995)- et al.
A different consideration about the globally asymptotically stable solution of the periodic n-competing species problem
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1991)
Cited by (24)
Predator–prey interaction system with mutually interfering predator: role of feedback control
2020, Applied Mathematical ModellingDynamics of a non-autonomous biocontrol model on native consumer, biocontrol agent and their predator
2020, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :For this reason, more and more attentions have been gained on studying the dynamics of time-dependent ecological models. See, for example, [2–10] and the references therein. In nature, the nonnegative time-dependent parameters are more fit for realistic environments than those bounded below by positive constants.
Uniqueness of periodic solutions of a nonautonomous density-dependent predator-prey system
2015, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and ApplicationsAverage conditions for competitive exclusion in a nonautonomous two dimensional Lotka-Volterra system
2013, Mathematical and Computer ModellingInfluence of feedback controls on an autonomous Lotka-Volterra competitive system with infinite delays
2013, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :The traditional Lotka–Volterra competition system has been studied extensively. Many excellent results concerned with the permanence, extinction and global attractivity of the Lotka–Volterra system are obtained, see [1–13] for example. In [18], the authors argued that in a situation where the equilibrium is not the desirable one (or affordable) and a smaller value is required, we are required to alter the system structurally by introducing a feedback control variable [19] or [20].
Permanence and global attractivity of a periodic predator-prey system with mutual interference and impulses
2012, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
- 1
The author was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province.
- 2
The author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.