Elsevier

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volume 17, Issue 13, 25 November 1996, Pages 1389-1398
Pattern Recognition Letters

Incorporating mixed pixels in the training, allocation and testing stages of supervised classifications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(96)00095-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Conventional supervised classifiers cannot accommodate mixed pixels directly but may be modified to do so throughout the classification process. Here mixed pixels are included in all three stages of maximum likelihood and neural network classifications. The results show that by accommodating for mixed pixels in the classification, more accurate, appropriate and useful outputs may be derived.

References (12)

  • K. Arai

    A supervised Thematic Mapper classification with a purification of training samples

    Internat. J. Remote Sensing

    (1992)
  • J.B. Campbell

    Introduction to Remote Sensing

    (1987)
  • G.M. Foody

    Fully fuzzy supervised image classification. RSS'95: Remote Sensing in Action

  • G.M. Foody

    Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely sensed data

    Internat. J. Remote Sensing

    (1996)
  • G.M. Foody et al.

    Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum likelihood classification

    Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

    (1992)
  • M.F. Goodchild

    Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modelling: methodological issues

    J. Vegetation Sci.

    (1994)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text