Estimating pose uncertainty for surface registration
References (21)
- et al.
Object modelling by registration of multiple range images
Image and Vision Computing
(1992) Analysis of 3D rotation fitting
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
(1994)- et al.
A method for registration of 3D shapes
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
(1992) - et al.
Validation of 3D registration methods based on points and frames
- et al.
Validation of 3D registration methods based on points and frames
INRIA Tech Report RR2470
(1995) - X. Pennec, J.-P. Thirion, A framework for uncertainty and validation of 3D registration methods based on points and...
- et al.
Overview: computer vision performance characterization
- et al.
Error propagation in machine vision
Machine Vision and Applications
(1994) - D. Brujic, M. Ristic, Monte Carlo simulation and analysis of free form surface registration, Journal of Engineering...
Cited by (16)
Global registration of large collections of range images with an improved Optimization-on-a-Manifold approach
2014, Image and Vision ComputingCitation Excerpt :These methods are usually employed to improve the alignment obtained after the application of a coarse alignment technique. Many approaches to this problem are related to the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) technique, first introduced in [13,14], and to its efficient variants introduced afterwards [15–18]. The ICP technique is an iterative approach for which, at every iteration, a set of correspondences is established between two views, and used to estimate the rototranslation matrix that brings these views closer to alignment.
A method for automated registration of unorganised point clouds
2008, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingCitation Excerpt :Some research about the estimation of position uncertainty in range sensors has been conducted. For example, registration of three-dimensional data (Johnson and Kang, 1997; Dorai et al., 1997; Pennec and Thirion, 1997; Stoddart et al., 1996), uncertainty of sampled three-dimensional surfaces (Tasdizen and Whitaker, 2003; Pauly et al., 2004; Whaite and Ferrie, 1991), range error analysis for different kinds of laser scanners (Blais et al., 2000) and surface normal estimation in noisy datasets (Mitra et al., 2004). Except for Tasdizen and Whitaker (2003), Mitra et al. (2004), Guehring (2001), Williams et al. (1999), Blais et al. (2000) and Whaite and Ferrie (1997), the others regard the measurement of the position of a point using laser scanners as a stochastic process with a three-dimensional, isotropic, and zero-mean Gaussian probability density function.
Recursive scan-matching SLAM
2007, Robotics and Autonomous SystemsCitation Excerpt :The averaged RMS error for the vertices gives an estimate of point alignment accuracy. Similarly, in [18] another parameter is defined called registration index. The registration index gives an indication of how well two surfaces may be registered.
Analysis of skin movement with respect to flexional bone motion using MR images of a hand
2006, Journal of BiomechanicsAn artificial intelligence approach to registration of free-form shapes
2004, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing TechnologyNewton methods for parametric surface registration. Part I: Theory
2003, CAD Computer Aided DesignCitation Excerpt :Today, the ICP method is widely used in registration applications. Currently surface registration research continues to expand on the ICP method by making additional enhancements or application specific modifications [4–9]. Free-form surface registration has a wide variety of applications including object recognition [10–12], autonomous vehicles for mining [13] and planetary rovers [14], medical imaging [15,16], computer-assisted and minimally invasive surgery [17,18], reverse engineering [19–21], and manufacturing inspection [22,23].