Universal service in the European Union

doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(00)86838-0

Government Information Quarterly

Volume 16, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 329-343

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(00)86838-0 Get rights and content

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, the European Union (EU) has pursued a program of comprehensive telecommunications liberalization. The increased reliance on competition necessitated the establishment of explicit universal service policies. European universal service policies define the scope and cost of universal service as well as permissible funding mechanisms. Emphasizing competition over social goals, the EU has adopted a rather narrow version of universal service. Future revisions may provide an opportunity to adopt a more ambitious universal service model.

References (27)

William H. Melody
Telecom Reform: Progress and Prospects
Telecommunications Policy
(1999)
European Commission
First Monitoring Report on Universal Service in Telecommunications in the European Union
After the Maastricht Treaty of the European Communities changed their name to “European Union”
International Telecommunication Union
World Telecommunications Development Report 1998
(1998)
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
Communications Outlook
(1997)
Eurodata Foundation
T-Basket
(1999)
Eli M. Noam
Telecommunications in Europe
(1992)
Marcellus S. Snow
The State as Stopgap: Social Economy and Sustainability of Monopoly in the Telecommunications Sector
Review of Social Economy
(April 1988)
Theo Thiemeyer
Deregulation in the Perspective of the German Gemeinwirtschaftslehre
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
(October 1983)

Yair Aharoni

The Evolution and Management of State Owned Enterprises

(1986)

John Vickers et al.

Privatization: An Economic Analysis

(1988)

European Commission, Directorate General XIII

Status Report on European Telecommunications Policy

(March 1999)

Thomas Kiessling et al.

The EU Regulatory Framework in Telecommunications: A Critical Analysis

Telecommunications Policy

(1998)

Cited by (16)

Juggling ecumenical wisdoms and xenophobic institutions: Framing and modelling China's telecommunications universal service and rural digitalization initiatives and policies
2022, Telecommunications Policy
China historically belongs to a farming civilization, in which rural population tended to stick to their farmlands for a lifetime. This situation has somehow been changing with, inter alia, the advancement and application of modern Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). In recent years, China has been pushing for the inclusion of its rural communities into modern information society through aggressively digitalizing its rural areas under a public policy umbrella. With the literature's lopsided focus on Western nations, a cohesive paradigm in mapping the Chinese style of universal service implementation remains elusive, a situation that has often obfuscated deeper understanding of the Chinese case from a socioeconomic, technological, or institutional perspective. The main purpose of this present paper lies in the framing and modelling of China's universal service and rural digitalization practices. The paper proposes and applies an integrated offer–agent–target (OAT) framework in a retrospective and empirical examination of the Chinese case and conceptual characterization of what has appeared to be the Chinese model. In so doing, China's universal service development is demarcated into discernible stages that are then pattern-matched with corresponding institutional landscapes. Three salient stages are identified and corresponding institutional landscapes explicated. Finally, insights and suggestions are offered that throws lights on the current issues and future developments.
Should next generation access networks fall within the scope of universal service? A European union perspective
2014, Government Information Quarterly
Citation Excerpt :
In the theoretical discussion on USO in the European Union, it has been shown that the drivers of information access in the European Union have shifted in the 1990s from a monopolistic to a competitive environment in which problems of convergence have to be addressed. For example, Bauer (1999) showed that emerging competition in infrastructures and services requires a reconsideration of these obligations. In his work, he criticized the narrow approach of European institutions in defining the borders of universal service, arguing that the definition of universal service in the late 1990s has been limited in addressing only a “minimum set of safeguards for basic services and constrained the ability of member states to fund such programs” (Bauer, 1999).
In 2010 the European Commission (EC) undertook a review of its current Universal Service Obligation (USO) to discuss whether or not broadband should be included in it. In fact, convergence of telephony, internet and media, further market liberalization and rapid technological development in the broadband market challenge the traditional definition of USO and increasingly question its notion of a “basic set of communication services”, which does not include broadband. In this context, the paper looks at the origins, the theoretical arguments for, and the empirical basis of the USO in light of the ongoing debate in the EU, and links these arguments to technological developments and changing demand conditions in European broadband markets. The authors propose that the European Commission should include in its future USO regulation provisions for a wider set of services based on Next Generation Access (NGA) networks rooted in the EC's new regulatory approach. Even if these provisions have not been included in the new USO framework in November 2011 further discussions are needed to account for the new realities of broadband markets in the European Union.
Mapping the field: Retrospective of the federal universal service programs
2013, Telecommunications Policy
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act) established the framework for four federal universal service programs: the High-Cost program, the Low-Income program, the Schools and Libraries (E-rate) program, and the Rural Health Care program. During the past 15 years, these programs have been examined from a number of perspectives in an attempt to measure their efficiency and effectiveness, including the funding mechanisms that support them. The Federal Communications Commission is in the process of restructuring the universal service programs to move support to broadband-based technologies. This is an opportune time to examine what is known about whether these programs have met the universal service objectives of the 1996 Act and have efficiently and effectively used universal service funding. To that end, this article surveys both oversight reports by federal government agencies and academic research literature drawn from a variety of sources to identify areas of concern regarding the mission, implementation, and impact of the federal universal service programs and support mechanisms. The article also includes research findings on how the economic incentives created by the federal universal service programs affect corporate investment and deployment decisions and consumer service and technology adoption decisions.
Special tariffs to promote fixed telephony penetration: Reflections from the UK experience during the 1990s
2004, Telecommunications Policy
The liberalisation of the telecommunication sector has dispossessed regulators from the use of cross-subsidisation in order to achieve the universality goal. In a liberalised context, special tariff schemes represent one possible policy tool in order to increase the penetration rate. This paper focuses on the UK fixed home telephone network and analyses LUS and InContact tariff schemes adopted by British Telecom (BT) in the 1990s. Both schemes turned out to yield unsatisfactory results. This paper, after reviewing past literature on telephone access demand, uses an econometric approach to test whether such schemes were properly targeted to suit the characteristics of “un-phoned” households. The empirical analysis points out that some important socio-economic factors, rather than simply low income, are the major drivers of non-connection. The failure to take into account these and other factors discussed in the paper, has significantly contributed to the poor results of the two special tariff schemes. In this context the UK experience provides a useful basis for discussion on the validity of policies aimed at promoting network good adoption via the introduction of special tariff schemes.
Institutional arrangements and price rebalancing: Empirical evidence from the United States and Europe
2002, Information Economics and Policy
This paper explores the rebalancing of prices for voice service in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) from conceptual and empirical perspectives. We determine the overall cost and structure of a standardized basket of residential and business services. Our data indicate that during the 1994–2000 period the degree of rate rebalancing was significantly higher in the EU than in the US. While the developments at the level of EU Member States are more heterogeneous and the process of rate rebalancing is not completed, these findings correspond to the predictions derived from our comparative institutional analysis.
Internet access in the European Union and in the United States
2002, Telematics and Informatics
In Europe and the US demand for Internet access is growing rapidly. Recent data provide evidence that the gap between these regions is once again increasing. Controlling for selected structural and corporate strategic factors, this paper examines the effects of public policies towards traditional communications infrastructures on Internet access. We analyze the nexus between these variables at a qualitative and quantitative level. Based on a pooled set of data, our empirical results indicate a significant influence of policies affecting market entry and the pricing of services on Internet access. Thus, contrary to the view of the Internet as a regulation-free space, important direct and indirect effects originate from regulatory policy.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Universal service in the European Union

Abstract

Telecommunications Policy

After the Maastricht Treaty of the European Communities changed their name to “European Union”

World Telecommunications Development Report 1998

Communications Outlook

T-Basket

Telecommunications in Europe

The State as Stopgap: Social Economy and Sustainability of Monopoly in the Telecommunications Sector

Review of Social Economy

Deregulation in the Perspective of the German Gemeinwirtschaftslehre

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics

The Evolution and Management of State Owned Enterprises

Privatization: An Economic Analysis

Status Report on European Telecommunications Policy

The EU Regulatory Framework in Telecommunications: A Critical Analysis

Telecommunications Policy