Elsevier

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volume 13, Issue 4, 10 June 2000, Pages 225-234
Knowledge-Based Systems

A rule-based expert system approach to process selection for cast components

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00075-7Get rights and content

Abstract

A knowledge-based expert system at the discretion of casting product designers can be employed as a real-time expert advisor to assist product designers to achieve the correct casting design and select the most appropriate casting process for a given component. This paper proposes a rule-based expert system approach for casting process selection, and describes an ongoing rule prototype development. The system in its present development state consists of five interconnected levels each concerning a particular process selection parameter or group of parameters including alloy to be cast, casting geometric features, casting accuracy, production quantity and overall comparative costs. The system progressively evaluates the user's specifications against the capabilities of various casting processes and in each level selects the processes that satisfy the design parameters specified. The final comparative cost level compares the processes that have satisfied all the criteria in the previous levels and recommends the most economical option.

Introduction

Casting is one of the most widely used manufacturing processes for shaping metallic alloys. It involves pouring molten metal into a mould that contains the cavity of the desired shape where the metal solidifies to form a cast component. Casting processes are classified by the type of mould materials used (e.g. sand, metal, ceramic), moulding techniques and the methods by which the molten alloy is introduced into the mould cavity (e.g. gravity, low pressure, high pressure). Availability of many casting processes and a diverse range of casting alloys enable casting of almost any imaginable metal part, regardless of shape, size or intricacy for many different applications.

Casting design and manufacture is, however, a complex problem and involves the interactions of many interdependent casting process variables. Designing cast components and determining the correct casting process requires extensive knowledge of various casting processes and their practical capabilities and limitations. Quite an extensive experience curve is necessary in order for one person alone to be able to acquire all the knowledge and experience needed. It is, therefore, highly unlikely that a casting product designer will have all the knowledge needed to solve a whole range of casting design problems. On the other hand, casting experts, often using heuristics obtained through extensive experience, can assess a casting design and its suitability for a particular casting process, in a relatively short time.

In practice, casting product designers need to communicate with casting experts in order to ensure that the casting being designed is manufacturable and the most appropriate casting process is chosen. Lack of timely communication between these parties or lack of expertise support can lead to erroneous designs and extensive design lead times. The problems originated in such scenarios are considerably magnified when the design engineer is as yet inexperienced. A casting expert system at the discretion of casting product designers that has captured and incorporated the problem solving procedures applied by casting process experts for solving such problems would, therefore, be a viable alternative solution.

Since the late 1980s but more specifically during the 1990s there has been an active research interest in exploring possibilities of developing and applying expert systems in the fields of product design and manufacture with particular emphasis on process selection [1], [2], [3]. A number of authors have reported some developments in the specific areas of casting design and castability evaluation [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], and casting process and alloy selection [9], [10]. A few developments reported concern relatively narrow domains such as design of dies and die casting process selection [5], [11], [12] and design of rigging systems for investment casting [13]. Undoubtedly, these developments have made substantial contributions towards practical applications of expert systems in certain domains of casting design and manufacture. There is, however, still much scope for further research and development of expert systems for solving diverse casting problems.

A comprehensive tool that could assist product designers in selecting the most appropriate casting process for a given design situation is, therefore, the subject of this paper. It discusses the development and the features of an ongoing rule-based prototype expert system, and the features described here are confined to its present state of development.

Section snippets

Development of casting process selection system

To achieve a successful expert system development a systematic development methodology is essential. The development of the present expert system followed the methodology shown in Fig. 1.

System structure and features

As this is an ongoing prototype development some further development work is being undertaken or anticipated to take place. This work includes adding more rules to further enhance the expertise of the system, and introducing a second major part, namely a ‘casting design advice’ system to assist product designers to achieve cost effective casting designs for a preconceived or preferred casting process.

The casting process selection system, also named as ‘Casting Process Selector’, has been

System testing and validation

An important step of an expert systems development process is the evaluation of the performance of the system, which involves both testing and validation. It is imperative that expert systems are tested and validated before their effective employment in the intended user environment. The subject of validation in particular has received considerable interest among many AI researchers [17], [18], [19], [20]. Whilst testing involves program debugging, error analysis, input acceptance, output

Benefits of using the system

The present expert system development work is aimed at casting product designers. As discussed earlier, casting product designers would normally attempt to seek support from casting experts for reaching correct solutions, as and when such support is needed. Unavailability or lack of timely availability of such expertise support can lead to undesirable results including incorrect solutions or prolonged design lead times with adverse costs consequences. In the face of market pressure to reduce

Conclusions

A rule-based expert system has been proposed for casting process selection to assist casting product designers in making correct process choice decisions for a given design situation. The system described in this paper is an ongoing prototype development and further expansion of the system is being under taken.

The system consists of five interconnecting levels each concerning a particular process selection parameter or a group of features. The system progressively evaluates and selects the

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof S.K. Bhattacharyya for the provision of research facilities of Warwick Manufacturing Group, and individuals and their organizations for providing data and their valuable expertise contributions.

References (20)

  • B. Knight et al.

    An object-oriented support tool for the design of casting procedures

    Engineering Applications in Artificial Intelligence

    (1995)
  • M. Kadidal et al.

    A castability expert system

    Computers and Industrial Engineering

    (1993)
  • N. Sirilertworakul et al.

    A knowledge base for alloy and process selection for casting

    International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture

    (1993)
  • A. Kar

    An expert system for manufacturing process selection

    ASM Transactions

    (1996)
  • J.C. Yu et al.

    Computer aided design for manufacturing process selection

    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

    (1993)
  • J.K. Blundell et al.

    An expert system for manufacturing process selection

    AFS Transactions

    (1994)
  • R. Natarajan

    An integrated environment for intelligent design of castings

  • J.A. Woodward et al.

    An expert system to assist the design for manufacture of die cast components

    Engineering Designer

    (1990)
  • B. Ravi, Knowledge-based casting design, Official Exchange Paper from India for presentation at 62nd World Foundry...
  • A. Er et al.

    Knowledge-based system for casting process selection

    AFS Transactions

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (42)

  • Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty

    2019, Renewable Energy
    Citation Excerpt :

    This subjective linguistic rating was based on the following rules defined in Table 1, which were developed considering technology maturity, resource quality, and supply reliability. Rule-based methods have been used in different engineering applications in selection and decision making [37]. These rules represent the choices made by decision makers in the assessments regarding energy selection, and can vary depending on the risk and innovation preferences of individual communities.

  • Development of an expert system for the simulation model for casting metal substructure of a metal-ceramic crown design

    2017, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The ES operated as an interactive system, responding to questions, making recommendations, and aiding in making decisions. Er and Dias [10] developed ES for casting process selection. The rule-based ES assisted the designers in selecting the most appropriate casting process.

  • A decision support framework considering sustainability for the selection of thermal food processes

    2014, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    For the selection of a machine tool, Çimren et al. (2007) discussed productivity, flexibility, safety and environment, adaptability, while Ayag (2007) discussed space adaptability, precision, reliability, maintenance and service in addition. Er and Dias (2000) investigated technical design considerations and cost factors in the selection of cast components. Nagahanumaiah et al. (2008) evaluated manufacturability, compatibility, cost effectiveness in choosing injection mold.

  • A fuzzy-decision-tree approach for manufacturing technology selection exploiting experience-based information

    2013, Expert Systems with Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    Rule-based systems collect information directly from an expert or through questionnaires and represent the knowledge through an IF-THEN type production rules. This type of acquisition requires constant maintenance and updating to ensure the information is kept up-to-date (Er & Dias, 2000; Masood & Soo, 2002). Conversely, case-based reasoning (CBR) systems work extremely well by retrieving and adapting old solutions to solve new problems (Kraslawski, Koiranen, & Nyström, 1995; Tan et al., 2006; Toussaint & Cheng, 2008), however inference will locate the nearest single match to provide a solution rather than use multiple rules to justify a decision.

  • Methodology for capturing and formalizing DFM Knowledge

    2010, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some selection tools, such as a CES Selector [13], PRIMA [4] and MAS [11], select from among all manufacturing processes. Other selection tools, such as the forging process selector [14], select from among specific processes. When the set of processes has been limited, DFM guidelines become essential to evaluate the design according to manufacturing aspects [10].

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Ex-Warwick University Postgraduate

View full text