Conceptual modelling of building regulation knowledge

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-1810(96)00043-XGet rights and content

Abstract

In recent years knowledge has become more and more a critical production factor for many organisations. Adequate performance of many activities depends on the availability of knowledge. However, volume and complexity of knowledge increase more and more. Consequently the accessibility of knowledge decreases.

Knowledge of fire-safety regulations is critical for architects to design fire-safe buildings and for local authorities to verify fire-safety of building designs. However, effective application of this knowledge in the Netherlands is a problem because of the volume, complexity and inaccessibility of the Dutch Fire-Safety Regulations. People in practice don't understand and consequently misinterpret the regulations. A solution to this lack of knowledge is the development of a knowledge based system.

In the development of knowledge based systems the conceptual modelling phase is an important one. In this phase knowledge of the application-domain is modelled using a conceptual modelling language.This paper describes criteria for selecting a suitable conceptual modelling language taking into account the nature of knowledge in a particular application-domain. Further it explains what the nature of building regulation knowledge is and which conceptual modelling language is most suitable to represent this knowledge. Finally the paper describes and shows some contents of a knowledge based system that advises architects to design fire-safe buildings conforming to the regulations and helps local authorities to verify building designs with respect to fire-safety regulations.

References (10)

  • F. Hayes-Roth et al.

    The state of knowledge-based systems

    Communications of the ACM

    (1994)
  • G.L. Lucardie

    Computer Science

  • J. Rumbaugh
  • R.J. Brachman

    I lied about the trees, or, defaults and definitions in knowledge representation

    AI Magazine

    (1985)
  • S.J. Fenves

    Tabular decision logic for structural design

    Journal of the Structural Division

    (1966)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (8)

  • A building regulation question answering system: A deep learning methodology

    2020, Advanced Engineering Informatics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, to provide additional computerized support to the users of regulations, representing regulation knowledge in a formal and computer-interpretable way is necessary [3]. A variety of modeling approaches have been applied to represent the logic of building regulations [6], which include object-oriented [7], rule-based [8], ontology-based [9] and semantic-based [10]. A detailed review of regulation knowledge modeling and automatic rule-based checking can be found in the works of Zhong et al. [3], Eastman et al.[8] and Pauwels et al.[10].

  • Toward improving the quality compliance checking of urban private constructions in Iran: An ontological approach

    2018, Sustainable Cities and Society
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, before that, the related studies in the field of QCC are discussed. With the emergence of BIM (Eastman, Eastman, Teicholz, Sacks, & Liston, 2011) along with research studies on the modeling of the regulation knowledge in the construction industry (de Gelder, 1997; Eastman, Lee, Jeong, & Lee, 2009; Zhou & El-Gohary, 2015), various research projects have been conducted in the field of compliance checking (Baumgärtel, Kadolsky, & Scherer, 2014; Solihin & Eastman, 2015; Zhang & El-Gohary, 2014; Zhang & El-Gohary, 2015; Zhong, Ding et al., 2012). Among these, the number of studies addressed the QCC in the construction industry.

  • Safety regulation: The lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden

    2015, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The alternatives for developing an IT support system are either that companies in industry, trade associations, or professional associations could coordinate to finance the project or that government could see it as part of its duty of informing the regulated of their obligations. If two or more agencies regulate the same activity of the company, those regulations may overlap and even conflict (Lord Robens, 1972; de Gelder, 1997; Burman and Daum, 2009; Aagaard, 2011). Aagard shows that overlapping jurisdictions (he examines overlap between the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency) need not cause problems if the overlap is explicitly managed by the two agencies.

  • Ontology-based semantic modeling of regulation constraint for automated construction quality compliance checking

    2012, Automation in Construction
    Citation Excerpt :

    As Demir et al. pointed out, most regulations are presented as texts, whether paper or electronic, in order to give more computerized support to the users of regulations, it is necessary to represent the regulation knowledge in a formal and computer-interpretable way [12]. The review of regulation knowledge modeling and automatic rule-based checking (although dedicated in building design domain) can be obtained in refs. [12–14]. Previous research efforts mainly focused on the procedural implementation approach.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text