Elsevier

Medical Image Analysis

Volume 3, Issue 3, September 1999, Pages 237-264
Medical Image Analysis

CARABEAMER: a treatment planner for a robotic radiosurgical system with general kinematics

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(99)80022-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a focused beam of radiation as an ablative instrument to destroy brain tumors. To deposit a high dose of radiation in a tumor, while reducing the dose to healthy tissue, a large number of beams are crossfired at the tumor from multiple directions. The treatment planning problem (also called the inverse dosimetry problem) is to compute a set of beams that produces the desired dose distribution. So far its investigation has focused on the generation of isocenter-based treatments in which the beam axes intersect at a common point, the isocenter. However this restriction limits the applicability of the treatments to tumors which have simple shapes. This paper describes CARABEAMER, a new treatment planner for a radiosurgical system in which the radiation source can be arbitrarily positioned and oriented by a six-degree-of-freedom manipulator. This planner uses randomized techniques to guess a promising initial set of beams. It then applies space partitioning and linear programming techniques to compute the energy to be delivered along each beam. Finally, it exploits the results of the linear program to iteratively adapt and improve the beam set. Experimental results obtained with CARABEAMER on both patient and synthetic cases are presented and discussed. These results demonstrate that a radiosurgical system with general kinematics can deliver treatments in which the region receiving a high dose closely matches the shape of the tumor, even in complicated cases. They also suggest new research directions which are discussed at the end of the paper.

References (53)

  • L.A. Nedzi et al.

    Variables associated with the development of complications from radiosurgery of intracranial tumors

    Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1991)
  • L.A. Nedzi et al.

    Dynamic field shaping for stereotactic radiosurgery: a modeling study

    Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1993)
  • E.B. Podgorsak et al.

    Dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery

    Int. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1988)
  • S.W. Sloan et al.

    An implementation of Watson's algorithm for computing two-dimensional Delaunay triangulations

    Adv. Eng. Software

    (1984)
  • G. Turk

    Generating random points in triangles

  • J.R. Adler et al.

    Preliminary clinical experience with the CyberKnife: image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery

    Radiosurgery

    (1995)
  • J.R. Adler et al.

    Image-guided robotic radiosurgery

    Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery

    (1994)
  • G.K. Bahr et al.

    The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning

    Radiology

    (1968)
  • J. Barraquand et al.

    A random sampling scheme for path planning

    Int. J. Robotics Res.

    (1997)
  • M.P. Carol

    Conformal radiosurgery

  • B. Chazelle et al.

    A singly-exponential stratification scheme for semi-algebraic varieties and its applications

    (1989)
  • F. Colombo et al.

    Linear accelerator radiosurgery of three-dimensional irregular targets

    Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.

    (1990)
  • F. Colombo et al.

    Linear accelerator radiosurgery of three-dimensional irregular targets

    Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.

    (1990)
  • A.M. Cormack et al.

    The mathematics and physics of radiation dose planning using X-rays

    Contemporary Mathematics

    (1990)
  • H. Fuchs et al.

    Optimal surface reconstruction from planar contours

    Commun. ACM

    (1977)
  • P.E. Gill et al.
    (1991)
  • Cited by (30)

    • The future of robotics in hand surgery

      2009, Chirurgie de la Main
    • Synchrony - Cyberknife Respiratory Compensation Technology

      2008, Medical Dosimetry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This time is used efficiently to take and process the digital radiographic images to determine the target position. Optimization algorithm chooses the optimal beam directions automatically; the treatment planning system does not allow manual selection of beam directions.13,17,18 Inverse planning is used for the creation of all plans.

    • Tomotherapy and Other Innovative IMRT Delivery Systems

      2006, Seminars in Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Viewed narrowly, then, the CyberKnife is not an IMRT delivery system, because its radiation beam photon fluence is collimated but not modulated. However it can generate dose distributions similar to IMRT by delivering many unmodulated circular fields from a range of source positions and angles, with robotic arm trajectories and beam weighting optimized iteratively by dedicated software,75 an elegant, noncoplanar physical realization of Birchoff’s abstract line-drawing work.6 Indeed in principle CyberKnife can do better than fixed-field IMRT, because it is axiomatic that optimal photon beam dose distributions can be created by superposing very large numbers of suitably angled and weighted small fields.76

    • Robotics technology: A journey into the future

      2004, Urologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      These problems can be avoided in the preoperative stages given the appropriate visualization tools. Therefore, it is important that a robust visualization system be built that is linked to patient imaging data to offer the surgeon tools for visualization, robotic system setup, and port placement [36]. Computer modeling tools that help visualize the anatomic structures of the patient would aid the surgeon greatly in the preoperative stage.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text