Meeting patients’ needs with patient information systems: potential benefits of qualitative research methods
Introduction
Adequate patient information is important for the quality of care: it is one of the key indicators of patient satisfaction and it improves the effectiveness and efficiency of care giving [1]. The traditional means of disseminating patient information is the face-to-face explanation of the caregiver to the patient during the consultation. More extensive, background information can be given through paper-based flyers and, more recently, videos. The problem with these media, however, is that they address the ‘average’ patient, and deliver a uni-directional flow of information in a pre-fixed sequence. Electronic patient information systems, on the other hand, can use more interactive ways of informing patients, and may thus be better geared towards the needs and capacities of individual patients. In addition, electronic patient information systems can establish virtual meeting groups for patients, discussion lists, or occasions for (public or private) electronic interchanges between patients and experts. Through these means, such systems may enhance social support systems, may support patient decision making and planning [2], enhance the patient's trust in the caregiver and increase compliance [3].
Patient information systems are increasingly popular, but there are not many documented success stories about patient information systems (see for a concise review [4]). A core issue for such systems is their ‘usability’, which includes the extent to which the system takes the actual user's needs and capacities into account (ibid.). This issue might seem obvious, but failing to meet users’ needs has been a recurrent failure factor in the wider field of information system development [5], [6], [7], and is often caused by paying too little attention to these needs in the early, design phase of the system [8], [9], [10], [11]. For the success of patient information systems, the necessity to address the projected users’ needs is especially vital.
This article reports on our pilot evaluation of an electronic patient information system for children with amblyopia and their parents. Building upon the work of Forsythe and others, we will argue that qualitative research methods, as we used in our evaluation, can be of help in meeting patients’ needs with patient information systems.
Section snippets
Background
In amblyopia, normal vision in one eye fails to develop because of a difference in vision between the two eyes in early life. Amblyopia can only develop in very young children and the treatment has to start as early as possible, but in any case before the child has reached the age of 6 years. Treatment usually involves patching the unaffected eye to stimulate the use of the amblyopic eye. To improve the quality of care for children with amblyopia and their parents the Rotterdam Eye Hospital has
Research approach
To find out whether this electronic information system for patient information giving would improve the quality of care, the Eye Hospital wanted a scientific evaluation of the system. Their initial idea was that a controlled study would have to be done to proof the increased effectiveness, efficiency and patient satisfaction that this system would bring. Some 200 patients would constitute a control group, who would receive the common information that is given to patients with amblyopia (like
Effectiveness
The actual use of the system by the patients was disappointing. Most families only checked the CD-ROM once or twice. Afterwards, they never used the CD-ROM again. From the Internet site, only the Chatbox part was really used, but just by half of the 14 respondents. The only reason to use the Chatbox was to ask questions to the orthoptist or the ophthalmologist. No chatting between users evolved. As a result, a support network did not emerge or grow through use of the system.
Almost all of the
Discussion and conclusion
I think that the designers have been thinking too much from their own point of view. With the best intentions. But the people who worked on it haven't really put themselves in the position of the people who get the information, the parents. That's what I think I'm seeing in this system (respondent J).
I still know what I first thought when I heard about the system: ‘it's nice that they made this, but is all this necessary for amblyopia?’ (respondent J)
This interactive electronic information
References (31)
Using ethnography in the design of an explanation system
Expert Systems Appl.
(1995)Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: implications for computer-based patient records
AI Med.
(1995)- et al.
Health care providers and purchasers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(1999) - et al.
Developers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications. The Science Panel on Interactive Communications and Health
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(1999) - et al.
Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(1999) Patient care information systems and healthcare work: A sociotechnical approach
Int. J. Med. Inf.
(1999)- et al.
The health care professional's workstation: Its functional components and user impact
- et al.
Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology
JAMIA
(1998) - et al.
Informing patients: A guide for providing patient health information
JAMIA
(1998) - et al.
Patient-centered information systems