Elsevier

Information Fusion

Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2003, Pages 217-229
Information Fusion

Sensor-fusion of hydraulic data for burst detection and location in a treated water distribution system

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-2535(03)00034-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents research into analysis and data fusion for sensors measuring hydraulic parameters (flow and pressure) of the pipeline water flow in treated water distribution systems. An artificial neural network (ANN) based system is used on time series data produced by sensors to construct an empirical model for the prediction and classification of leaks. A rules based system performs a fusion on the ANNs’ outputs to produce an overall state classification for a set of zones. Results are presented using data from an experimental site in a distribution system of a UK water company in which bursts were simulated by hydrant flushing. The ANN system successfully detected events and a study of the pressure gradient across the zone provided a more precise location within the zone.

Introduction

Treated water is distributed in the industrial world by means of pipeline networks. Leakage from a water distribution pipeline network can be defined as that water which, having been obtained from a source, treated and put into supply, leaks or escapes other than by a deliberate action. In the UK, between 20% and 30% of transported water was lost through leakage during the 1990s [1]. This figure is even higher for older pipes [2]. The loss of such large volumes of water is environmentally and economically damaging and this situation is likely to be a major issue during the 21st century as more extreme environmental fluctuations are experienced due to the climatic consequences of global warming. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has highlighted that water resources will be seriously affected in many areas [3].

The most common technique for identifying leakage is to conduct a water audit in which a detailed account of water flow into and out of the distribution system, or parts of it, is recorded. At the level of the whole system, this consists of a total water supply balance, i.e. the summation of all water consumed (metered and unmetered) and not consumed (leakage, theft, exports etc.) compared with the total distribution input. District flow metering extends this to monitoring individual zones [4], [5]. The distribution system (in urban areas or strategically important trunk mains) is subdivided into discrete zones or district meter areas (DMA), by the permanent closure of valves. A DMA will generally comprise 500–3000 properties. Flow (and sometimes pressure) sensors are placed on the DMA boundaries and collected data is subsequently analysed for leakage trends. The most popular operational use of flow data is the analysis of measured minimum night flows. Night flows (usually measured between midnight and 5:00 am) are used because water use is at a minimum and it is easier to identify and subtract legitimate flows. Any remaining unusual jumps in volumes will signify leakage in the absence of any other factors. If it is established that leakage has increased sufficiently to warrant further investigation, then a manual leakage detection is carried out on the entire DMA using methods such as step testing, sounding and leak noise correlation [6]. This detection takes approximately one day per 350 properties per leakage team.

In general, flow sensors log the flow every 15 minutes. Data from such flow metering has, until recently, always been gathered by manual download in the field with a downloading period of one or more weeks. In recent years, more sophisticated online data acquisition systems have become available to allow critical flows (for example reservoir outlets) to be monitored. This approach allows a minimisation of the time for leak detection by using online data from telemetry systems along the lines of a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. In a leakage context, a SCADA system requires the use of a computer system, sensor data acquisition and an analysis algorithm to evaluate the sensor data and produce a leakage determination. A class of SCADA variant widely used in the oil industry is that of mass flow measurement methods which rely on various physical phenomena to obtain accurate measurements of the total mass flow between two points on a pipeline. However, the cost of sensors and data communication equipment necessary for implementing a full SCADA system on a large water pipeline network is currently prohibitive––where there is a lack of perceived environmental impact from a large scale leak (in contrast to fuel transportation for example).

A number of techniques are under investigation for automated leakage detection from real time telemetry systems. Recent work has seen attempts to link hydraulic models with online data from telemetry systems [7] and hence perform leak detection by solving an inverse steady state problem [8]. State estimation, widely used in the electrical power industry, has been investigated as a solution [9], [10], [11]. Research has been carried out on a method of using state estimation for leakage detection in a DMA structured system without measurements inside the DMA [12], [13]. The inverse transient technique has been proposed for leak location when a number of pressures within a DMA are present. This method is based upon the minimisation of the sum of the quadratic errors between the measured head values and those calculated by computer simulation in the hydraulic model [14]. All of these techniques rely on the accuracy of real-time hydraulic simulations, which are limited by modelling errors, a very limited number of sensors in most distribution systems, and accuracy and reliability of sensor data.

An alternative approach is to adopt a pattern recognition methodology in which a sensor’s output (discrete time series data) is treated as a signal and is analysed by techniques from the statistical and AI fields. AI-based systems can automate mundane tasks involved in the process, as well as presenting more ‘intelligent’ information to the operator. The concept is to analyse one or more sensor’s output with an ANN in order to identify meaningful patterns, and present a fusion of these patterns to the operator.

This paper outlines the development of a neural network knowledge-based system for automatically and continuously monitoring the signature (comprising the time series for one or more sensors) of a water pipeline distribution system for normal and abnormal behaviour. The output of this system will allow alarms to be raised for a DMA when failure or leaks are detected. The detection system adopts an empirical model based upon pattern recognition techniques applied to time series data. A rule-based module performs a fusion on the ANNs’ outputs to produce an overall state classification for a set of zones. The combination of these techniques comprises an innovative application in the field of leakage detection and location from water hydraulic time series data.

Section 2 provides theoretical background and a methodology for DMA level sensor monitoring and fusion. Section 3 describes an experimental trial conducted within a DMA in which bursts were simulated by flushing hydrants. Section 4 provides results of applying the DMA system to the experimental data. Section 5 presents a supplementary application of using fused data from the pressure sensors to provide a more precise localisation. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

The data sets produced by sensors comprise substantial time series that describe conditions in the distribution network. In effect, this amounts to sampling a non-linear dynamical system (the physical totality of the water pipe network). In the state space model, a set of differential equations describes the evolution of the variables whose values determine the current state of the system. The essential feature of the concept of a ‘state’ for a dynamical system is that it should contain all the

Experimental trials

A DMA in a water distribution system was selected as the test bed for a leakage detection case study (DMA B from Section 2.3). In order to provide data for analysis and test the system previously described, a series of burst trials were conducted in DMA B with the co-operation of the water utility. The aims of these tests were to provide a substantive multi-source data set covering the hydraulic response to simulated bursts and to assess whether a data fusion from these sources was capable of

ANN training and results

During these trials DMA B_2 had a different configuration to normal due to rehabilitation work. The valve was closed allowing no flow through the B_2 PRV, and another valve was opened allowing the section to be fed by from another zone. Therefore, the section was isolated from zones A and B and the DMA sensor for B_2 was not needed in the analysis. Hence, only the former two flow sensors were monitored by the DMA level system for the trial data, in effect a subsection of the network described

Pressure sensor fusion

A total of 14 portable pressure sensors were deployed in the zone (installation via hydrant) for the experimental trial. The data set ran from 8/5/01 to 18/5/01 and included the flushing trials. The one-minute data files were assembled and prepared for analysis. In order to remove superfluous information and concentrate on the pressure drop it was decided to apply seasonal differencing to the raw data, thus removing the diurnal cycle. A seasonal (daily) difference filter was applied to the

Conclusions

In this paper, we have described a sensor-fusion methodology for hydraulic analysis of water distribution systems. This domain is characterised by large volumes of sensor time series data that has only been utilised in a limited manner for leak detection, generally by large scale audit. Data sets have not in general been analysed by, or used as input to, leading edge computer science based techniques: in particular in the field of artificial intelligence. Therefore, automated and intelligent

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support given for this research by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) under its Water Infrastructure and Treatment Engineering (WITE) Initiative. A research consortium of four university teams formed under the umbrella title ‘Monitoring, Modelling and Leakage Management in Water Distribution Networks’. The consortium consisted of the University of Bradford, the University of East Anglia, Brunel University and Imperial College. A

References (36)

  • P.J Skipworth et al.

    Practical applications of real time hydraulic modelling of water distribution networks

    Int. J. Comadem

    (1999)
  • R.S Pudar et al.

    Leaks in pipe networks

    J. Hydraul. Eng.––ASCE

    (1992)
  • F.C Schweppe

    Power system static state estimation

    IEEE Trans. PAS

    (1970)
  • M Sterling et al.

    Minimum norm state estimation for computer control of water distribution systems

    Procs. IEE

    (1984)
  • R.S Powell et al.

    A comparison of three real-time state-estimation methods for online monitoring of water distribution systems

  • J.H Andersen et al.

    Constrained state estimation with applications in water distribution network monitoring

    Int. J. Syst. Sci.

    (2001)
  • J.A Liggett et al.

    Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks

    J. Hydraul. Eng.––ASCE

    (1994)
  • N.H Packard et al.

    Geometry from time series

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (92)

    • Using artificial intelligence and data fusion for environmental monitoring: A review and future perspectives

      2022, Information Fusion
      Citation Excerpt :

      More specifically, DCNN was the main class of deep learning (DL) algorithms that has been widely investigated due to its salient characteristics and advantages in using convolution operations to extract image features. From another hand, data fusion methods have been largely employed in various research fields (e.g. smart systems [7], hydraulic [8], energy [9], wireless sensor networks [10], healthcare [11], etc.) to aggregate data from different sensors and hence attain better accuracy in extracting the pertinent features compared to using data from a single sensor/device [12]. In the same manner, for analyzing different kinds of RS images and coming up with more precise information, various data fusion have been adopted, e.g. spatio-temporal fusion [13], spectral fusion [6], multi-source data fusion [14] and pixel-level image fusion [15,16].

    • Toward urban sustainability and clean potable water: Prediction of water quality via artificial neural networks

      2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Li et al. (2018) utilized an acoustic emission technique coupled with ANNs as a potent pattern recognition classifier for the early leak detection in socket joints. Mounce et al. (2003) proposed a sensor-fusion-based scheme to account for hydraulic data, i.e., pressure and flow in a water supply system of a UK. As pointed out by the author, the system accurately identified the simulated leaks within the study zone.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text