Risk process with stochastic income and two-step premium rate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.06.016Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we deal with the risk reserve process with stochastic premium function. We assume that the premiums sizes have exponential distribution with the rate depending on some threshold level. The representation for the discounted defective joint density of surplus and deficit at ruin is obtained.

Introduction

We consider risk reserve processU(t)=u+C(t)-S(t),where u  0 is the initial capital, S(t) is the aggregate claim amount up to time t, C(t) is the premium income (see [6] for the study of related model). We assume that C(t), S(t) are independent compound Poisson processes with intensities λ1 and λ2, correspondingly. The claim sizes have common cumulative distribution function P(x) with finite mean 0P¯(x)dx< and the density p(x). Premiums have exponential distribution with the parameter c > 0.

Let T=inf{t>0:U(t)<0} be the time of ruin. Note that if ruin occurs, ∣U(T)∣ is the deficit at ruin and U(T−) is the surplus immediately prior to ruin. Denote byfδ(dx,dy|u)=Ee-δTI{U(T-)dx,|U(T)|dy,T<}|U(0)=u,the discounted defective joint density. Where δ  0 is the discounted factor and I{ · } is the indicator function. Then Gerber–Shiu discounted penalty function is represented byϕδ(u)=00w(x,y)fδ(dx,dy|u),where w(x, y) > 0 is the penalty when ruin occurs. Following [3], ϕδ(u) can be interpreted as expectation of the discounted penalty when ruin occurs. If w expresses the benefit amount of an insurance payable at time of ruin, then ϕδ(u) is the single premium of the insurance. Also ϕδ(u) has some interpretation in financial mathematics (for detail see [3], [13]).

The representation of fδ was obtained in [12], see also [1]. For the classical case when C(t) is the linear function ϕδ(u) have been studied in [3]. For some another model with random income see [7].

With w(x, y) = 1 function ϕδ(u) will be denoted by ψδ(u). Note that ψδ(0−) = 1 and as δ0:ψδ(u)ψ(u)=P{T<|U(0)=u}. If m=λ1/c-λ20P¯(y)dy>0, then ψ(u) < 1. Function ψδ(u) can be defined by generalized Beekman’s convolution formulaψδ(u)=1-0g+(x)dxn=0G¯+n(u),where G+n is the n-fold convolution of G+ and G+ is given by the defective density on (0, ∞)g+(x)=λ2δ+λ1+λ2p(x)+(c-ρ)xeρ(x-y)p(y)dy,ρ = ρ(δ) is the unique non-negative solution to the Lundberg fundamental equationλ1(c(c-ξ)-1-1)+λ2(pˆ(ξ)-1)=δ,pˆ is the Laplace transform of p.

For the study of Beekman’s convolution formula in the classical case see [14] and references there, further treatments for the model with random income can be found in [6]. Formula (1) is also referred to as Pollaczeck–Khinchine formula, see for example [2, Th. 2.1]. A further relevant reference related to Pollaczeck–Khinchine formula is [15]. For our process formula (1) can be obtained by inverting second factorization identity [12, Eq. (2.30)]. Formula for g+(x) is due to [12, Corollary 6.2, Eq. (6.51)].

In this paper we consider modification of the risk process with a two-step premium rate (see [2]). For the modified model, the insurer’s risk process we denote by U(t). In the model, two-step premium rate c˜ is of the following expression:c˜=c˜(U(t))=c,U(t)b,c,U(t)>b.The premium rate is c if the surplus is not greater than b, otherwise premium rate is c. The aim of this paper is to study the joint density of surplus and deficit at ruin for the risk process with random income and two-step premium ratefδb(dx,dy|u)=Ee-δTI{U(T-)dx,|U(T)|dy,T<}|U(0)=uwhich would result in an expression of Gerber–Shiu function (T is the time to ruin for the modified process).

For the study of joint density fδb we use approach which is similar to [4] (compare with [5], [8], [9]). We represent the distributions and moment generating functions (m.g.f.) of all functionals in term of corresponding Lundberg’s root, initial parameters of the process and Laplace transform of the time to ruin ψδ(u) = ϕδ(u)∣w(x,y) = 1.

The paper organized as follows. Section 2 recalls some results obtained in [1], [11], [12]. In particular, we recall the representations for the joint density fδ and for the m.g.f. of two-sided boundary functionals. In Section 3 we find the representation for the density fδb and consider the case with the inert zone (see [10]). Also using analog of the Cramer–Lundberg approximation we performed asymptotic analysis of ruin probabilities.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

Denote by Tb the time when process U(t), starting at 0  u  b, first exits from interval (0, b). The moment Tb plays a key role in analyzing a risk model with a two-step premium rate since it tells us when c˜ first switches from c to c before ruin. Denotefb,δ-(dx,dy|u)=Ee-δTbI{U(Tb-)dx,|U(Tb)|dy,U(Tb)0}|U(0)=u,Bb(δ,u)=Ee-δTbI{U(Tb)0}|U(0)=u,Bb(δ,u)=Ee-δTbI{U(Tb)b}|U(0)=u.The following results are from [11], [12], which are based on results of [1], with some another notation (compare with [12,

Joint density function

Our process U(t) can be viewed as two risk processes pieced together. U(t) coincide with U(t) (which has premium rate c) under level b and with U(t) (which has premium rate c) above the level. We use notation with ∗, which corresponds to the process U(t).

Theorem 1

For the modified risk process U(t) the discounted defective joint density is represented by

  • (1)

    for u  bfδb(dx,dy|u)=fb,δ-(dx,dy|u)+Bb(δ,u)fδbdx,dy|θc+b,

  • (2)

    for u > bfδb(dx,dy|u)=fδ(dx-b,dy+b|u-b)I{x>b}+0bgδ(dz|u-b)fb,δ-(dx,dy|b-z)+Bb(δ,b-z)fδbdx,

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the referees for many helpful suggestions and improvements.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2)

  • The compound binomial risk model with delayed claims and random income

    2012, Mathematical and Computer Modelling
    Citation Excerpt :

    To the best of our knowledge, Boucherie et al. [6] first added a compound Poisson process with positive jumps to the classical Cramér–Lundberg risk model to describe the stochastic income. Recently, similar topics were discussed by many authors, see [7–12] for more details. It is well-known that the compound binomial risk model is the discrete analogue corresponding to the classical Cramér–Lundberg risk model.

View full text