Construction of accelerating wavepackets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.04.060Get rights and content

Abstract

Accelerating wavepackets are obtained by applying the extended Galilean transformation to free-space particle wavepackets, or to time-dependent bound states. The transformed Schrödinger equation contains a potential term, which drives the acceleration. The method reproduces Darwin’s result for an accelerating Gaussian wavepacket in a constant force field, and Schrödinger’s oscillating wavepacket in a harmonic well. We also derive a new accelerating Airy wavepacket in a gravitational field, and give a new derivation of oscillating wavepackets based on the higher harmonic oscillator energy eigenstates. These results illustrate an analytic method of dealing with wavepackets accelerating in force fields.

Introduction

There is a wide variety of uses for particle wavepackets in quantum physics. Where explicit calculations are made, they are usually numerical (for an example of the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree–Fock method, see [1] and the references therein). Here we wish to put forward a set of relatively simple analytical results for wavepackets in linear and quadratic potentials, which illustrate the application of a general method. Specifically: given any form of free-space wavepacket, we show how to construct a corresponding wavepacket which is accelerating under the influence of a uniform field of force. And, from any energy eigenstate of the harmonic oscillator, we show how to construct a corresponding wavepacket which moves under the influence of a harmonic force. In all cases the resulting accelerating wavepackets satisfy Schrödinger’s time-dependent equation exactly.

The exact energy eigenfunctions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a particle in a constant force field and in a harmonic well are widely-known (see for example [2]). However, constructing a localized wavepacket for these potentials by summing or integrating over all the eigenfunctions is more complicated. Schrödinger produced a wavepacket which oscillates (without change of envelope) in the harmonic potential well, the first coherent state [3]. Darwin gave a wavepacket solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for an electron in a homogeneous electric field [4]. More recently, analytic solutions have been given for wavepackets moving in potentials proportional to sech2(x), 1/x2 and a delta function [5], [6], [7]. Another coherent state has been found for the quantum bouncer on a spring [8], although this one changes shape periodically during its oscillation.

This note demonstrates how the extended Galilean transformation [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] allows us to find solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a particle in a force field from wavepacket solutions for the free particle, or from time-dependent energy eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator. The method is restricted to non-relativistic quantum mechanics [14].

We begin with a brief description of the extended Galilean transformation. For the usual Galilean transformation, x = x + ut, t = t, u being constant. This is generalized to x=x+0tdt1u(t1),t=t: the frames are in relative motion with a variable velocity u = u(t). The derivatives in the two frames are related byx=x,t=t+u(t)x.

Suppose that in the frame (x, t) we have ψ(x, t) as the solution to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation:itψ=-22mx2+V(x)ψ.In a new frame (x′, t′) the Schrödinger equation becomesitψ=-22mx2-iux+V(x)ψ.We now choose a wavefunction ψ′(x′, t′) in the primed frame such thatψ(x,t)=ψx,texpifx,t.(The probability densities are the same at corresponding space–time points in the two frames, provided f′ is real.) Thenxψ=(xψ+iψxf)expifx,ttψ=(tψ+iψtf)expifx,t.Applying (4), (5) to (3), and factoring out exp[if′ (x′, t′)], we obtain a new Schrödinger equation for ψ′(x′, t′) in the primed frame. Now f′(x′, t′) is an arbitrary phase, and by choosing a suitable function for f′, we can construct a solution ψ′(x′, t′) of the transformed Schrödinger equation with a new potential. We will apply this method to two special cases of interest: a wavepacket accelerating in a gravitational field, and an oscillating wave packet in a harmonic well.

Section snippets

Wavepackets in a constant force field

We first apply the above formalism to find wavepackets for a particle subject to a constant force, such as a charge in a uniform electric field, or a mass in a uniform gravitational field. To be definite, we consider a particle of mass m subject to the force −mg, arising from the potential mgx. Let ψ(x, t) be a wavepacket solving the free-particle Schrödinger equation:itψ=-22mx2ψ.We apply the extended Galilean transformation x=x-12gt2,t=t (for which u(t′) = gt′) and choosef=m-ux+12u2dt=

Oscillating wavepacket in a harmonic well

As demonstrated above, we can indirectly solve the Schrödinger equation for a wavepacket in a gravitational field by applying a suitable transformation (constant acceleration) to the free wavepacket. In this section we show that it is also possible to rederive Yan’s [18] wavepackets oscillating in a harmonic well. These packets are remarkable in that they do not change shape as they oscillate: the profile of the absolute square of the wavefunction stays fixed. The first shape-invariant solution

Discussion

In the early days of quantum mechanics, one motivation for working on wavepackets was to find the correspondence between classical and quantum physics. Ehrenfest’s theorem, that the time derivative of 〈x〉 is equal to 〈p〉/m, and that the time derivative of 〈p〉 is equal to 〈−∂xV〉, shows that the classical equations of motion are always followed by the expectation values of position and momentum. Thus it is no surprize to find wavepackets accelerating uniformly in a constant force field and

References (23)

  • O. Koch et al.

    Approximation of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation by MCTDHF

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2006)
  • L.D. Landau et al.

    Quantum Mechanics

    (1965)
  • E. Schrödinger

    The continuous transition from micro- to macro-mechanics

    Die Naturwissenschaften

    (1926)
    L.I. Schiff

    Quantum Mechanics

    (1968)
  • C.G. Darwin

    Free motion in wave mechanics

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond.

    (1928)
  • M.J. Englefield

    Explicit solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

    J. Phys. A. Math. Gen.

    (1987)
  • J. Lekner

    Reflectionless eigenstates of the sech2 potential

    Am. J. Phys.

    (2007)
  • T. Cox et al.

    Reflection and non-reflection of particle wavepackets

    Eur. J. Phys.

    (2008)
  • J. Lekner et al.

    Quantum bouncer on a spring

    Eur. J. Phys.

    (2009)
  • G. Rosen

    Galilean invariance and the general covariance on non-relativistic laws

    Am. J. Phys.

    (1972)
  • C.J. Eliezer et al.

    The equivalence principle and quantum mechanics

    Am. J. Phys.

    (1977)
  • D. Greenberger

    Some remarks on the extended Galilean transformation

    Am. J. Phys.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Wavelet matrix operations and quantum transforms

      2022, Applied Mathematics and Computation
      Citation Excerpt :

      This has motivated researchers to design versatile quantum algorithms via representations of classic ones in terms of matrix structures. The resulting work has led to several new areas, including quantum transform theory, which implements function transforms via quantum methods [2–6]. The topic of quantum transforms (such as quantum Fourier and wavelet transforms) has generated strong connections with applied and computational mathematics since this theory was introduced in the 1990’s [5].

    • Self-focusing quantum states

      2018, American Journal of Physics
    • Semiclassical and quantum analysis of a free-particle Hermite wave function

      2014, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
    View full text