Pattern formation of a spatial predator–prey system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.04.071Get rights and content

Abstract

There are random and directed movements of predator and prey populations in many natural systems which are strongly influenced and modified by spatial factors. To investigate how these migration (directed movement) and diffusion (random movement) affect predator–prey systems, we have studied the spatiotemporal complexity in a predator–prey system with Holling–Tanner form. A theoretical analysis of emerging spatial pattern is presented and wavelength and pattern speed are calculated. At the same time, we present the properties of pattern solutions. The results of numerical simulations show that migration has prominent effect on the pattern formation of the population, i.e., changing Turing pattern into traveling pattern. This study suggests that modelling by migration and diffusion in predator–prey systems can account for the dynamical complexity of ecosystems.

Introduction

Investigation of spatial patterns in the distribution of organisms is a central issue in ecology [18]. This issue is usually treated in terms of reaction–diffusion models under a basic assumption that the motion of population is random and isotropic, i.e., without any preferred direction. Mathematically speaking, in a rather general case the dynamics of the given populations u (prey), and v (predator) can be described by the following equation [1], [2], [5], [11], [19], [20], [31], [32], [35], [36], [41]:ut=N(u,v)+Du2u,vt=P(u,v)+Dv2v,where 2=2/x2 or (2/x2+2/y2) is the usual Laplacian operator in 1 or 2-dimensional space and Du, Dv are prey and predator diffusion coefficients, respectively. N(u,v) and P(u,v) are associated with local processes such as birth, death and predation.

However, another type of dynamics can be given when the individuals exhibit a correlated motion towards certain direction. The origin of this motion may have different mechanism, and the typical motion is migration, which is corresponding to the case that the correlated motion caused by purely environmental factors such as wind in case of seeds or pollen spreading or water current in case of plankton communities [13], [24], [25]. Allowing for the above migration and diffusion, the spatiotemporal dynamics of a given population is then described by the following equation:ut+cuu=N(u,v)+Du2u,vt+cvv=P(u,v)+Dv2v,where =/x (or /y), which means that the individuals move in one direction. Here, cu and cv are migration speed.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of migration in a predator–prey system with self diffusion. To determine those features in the dynamics that are specifically caused by migration terms, we choose nonlinearity in the local kinetics, taking the form of a non-dimensional Holling–Tanner system.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give a Holling–Tanner model with both migration and diffusion whose parameters are rational biological determine the dynamics of the system. We analyze the dynamics of the model, and derive the dispersal relation with respect to model parameters in Section 3. In Section 4, by performing simulations, we illustrate the emergence of travelling pattern. Moreover, wavelength and pattern speed are calculated. Properties of pattern solutions are revealed by using AUTO in Section 5. Finally, some conclusions and discussions are given.

Section snippets

Main model

Since traditional Holling–Tanner type predator–prey model received great attention among theoretical and mathematical biologists [8], [9], [16], we will focus our attention on the following formdUdτ=r1U1-UK-qUVU+c,dVdτ=r2V1-VγU,where U and V denote the prey and predator, respectively. The parameters r1 and r2 represent the intrinsic growth rate. The value K represents the carrying capacity of the prey and γn takes on the role of a prey-dependent carrying capacity of the predator. The parameter γ

Dispersion relation

In order to give the dispersion relation of the full reaction–diffusion-migration system (6a), (6b), it is important to consider the local dynamics of the system. Firstly we need to determine the steady states of the non-spatial model obtained by setting space derivatives equal to zero. By calculation, we find the steady state as follows: E1=(1,0) (extinction of the predator); interior equilibrium point E=(u,v) (coexistence of prey and predator), whereu=v=1-a-b+(a+b-1)2+4b2.

In order to

Main results

In this following, we give numerical solution to system (6a), (6b) in one-dimensional space. We have used the RK4EX algorithm for the reaction terms, and a Fourier transform technique to calculate the first and second-order partial derivative in space x variables, i.e., the diffusion and migration terms. In addition, the Fourier technique can save time to gain these result, and our numerical results are also valid by using the explicit an Euler method. In our calculations, parameters values

Properties of pattern solutions

Our numerical analysis suggests that the patterns of system (6a), (6b) move at a constant speed, which means the patterns are periodic traveling wave solution, when with migration. For the sake of convenience, we firstly investigate the one dimensional space, and take the mathematical form u(x,t)=u(ξ) and v(x,t)=v(ξ), where ξ=x-ct and c is pattern speed. Also, the results are valid in two-dimensional space. Substituting these solution forms into (6a), (6b), we give the ODEsu(1-u)-auvb+u+(c-cu)du

Discussion and conclusion

An important type of interaction between species and their natural environment which effects population dynamics of all species is predation. As a result, predator–prey models have been in the focus of ecological science since the early days of this discipline. In the past three decades, investigations have revealed that spatial inhomogeneities like the inhomogeneous distribution of nutrients as well as interactions on spatial scales like migration can have an important impact on the dynamics

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Amit Chakraborty for his helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript. The research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11171314 and 11147015.

References (43)

  • J.-F. Zhang et al.

    Hopf bifurcation and Turing instability in spatial homogeneous and inhomogeneous predator–prey models

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2011)
  • L.-M. Zhu et al.

    Stationary patterns of a predator–prey model with spatial effect

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2010)
  • D. Alonso et al.

    Mutual interference between predators can give rise to turing spatial patterns

    Ecology

    (2002)
  • J.C. Allen et al.

    Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise

    Nature

    (1993)
  • P. Andresen et al.

    Stationary space-periodic structures with equal diffusion coefficients

    Phys. Rev. E

    (1999)
  • N. Bellomo et al.

    Multiscale biological tissue models and flux-limited chemotaxis for multicellular growing systems

    Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.

    (2010)
  • V.N. Biktashev et al.

    Pursuit-evasion predator–prey waves in two spatial dimensions

    Chaos

    (2004)
  • B. Blasius et al.
    (2007)
  • P.A. Braza

    The bifurcation structure of the holling-tanner model for predator–prey interactions using two-timing

    SIAM J. Appl. Math.

    (2003)
  • E.J. Doedel, R.C. Paffenroth, A. Champneys, T.F. Fairgrieve, Y.A. Kuznetsov, B.E. Oldman, B. Sandstede, X. Wang,...
  • R. Hengeveld

    Dynamics of Biological Invasions

    (1989)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey model with nonlocal effect and delay

      2020, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text