Elsevier

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volume 247, 15 November 2014, Pages 255-265
Applied Mathematics and Computation

New alternatives to ratio estimators of population variance in sample surveys

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.093Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we propose alternative estimators to ratio estimators given by Kadilar and Cingi (2006) and a class of estimators for population variance using the same approach adopted by Srivenkataramana (1980). Conditions under which the proposed estimators are more efficient than usual unbiased estimator, Isaki (1983) estimator, Biradar and Singh (1994) estimator and the estimators given by Kadilar and Cingi (2006) are obtained. The exact expressions for biases and mean squared errors of the proposed estimators are obtained. An empirical study has been carried out to demonstrate the performance of the suggested estimators. Also following Searls (1964), generalized version of the proposed class of estimators is also studied with its properties.

Introduction

Auxiliary information is often used in sample surveys to increase the precision of the estimators. For estimating the population parameters such as population mean, population variance etc. several authors have often used information on different parameters such as population mean, coefficient of variation, coefficient of kurtosis and coefficient of skewness of the auxiliary variate. Many researchers including Searl [9], Sisodia and Dwivedi [14], Pandey and Dubey [8], Singh and Tailor [10], Singh et al. [13], Tailor and Tailor [21], Tailor and Sharma [20], Tailor et al. [22], Tailor et al. [23], Solanki et al. [15] and Tailor and Lone [18] have paid their attention towards the improved estimation of population mean of the variable under study. In spite the estimation of population mean of the study variate, estimation of the population variance using supplementary information on the auxiliary variate has also attracted the attention of the survey statisticians. The problem of estimating the population variance using auxiliary information has been discussed by various authors including [5], [24], [25], [26], [1], [2], [3], [17], [6], [12], [19] etc.

Let U=U1,U2,,UN be a finite population of N units. Let (y,x) be the variate observed on Ui(i=1,2,3,,N). The values of auxiliary variate x are known for all units of the population. A sample of size n is drawn from population U using simple random sampling without replacement. Let us defineSy2=N-1-1i=1Nyi-Y2=N(N-1)σy2=N(N-1)μ20,Sx2=N-1-1i=1Nxi-X2=N(N-1)σx2=N(N-1)μ02,Y=N-1i=1Nyi,X=N-1i=1Nxi,β2(x)=μ04μ022,β2(y)=μ40μ202,β2(y)=Kβ2(y)-M,β2(x)=Kβ2(x)-M.μab=1Ni=1Nyi-Yaxi-Xb;a,bbeing non negative integers;K=(N-1)(Nn-N-n-1)(n-1)N(N-3),M=(N2n-3N2+6N-3n-3)(n-1)N(N-3),E(sy2sx2)=Sy2Sx21+(N-n)n(N-2)(Kl+2Bρ2-D),Esy2(x-X)2=(N-n)n2(N-1)(N2-2Nn+N)(N-2)(N-3)μ22+N(Nn-2n-N+1)(N-2)(N-3)μ20μ02-2N(N-n-1)(N-2)(N-3)μ112.where l=μ22μ20μ02 and ρ=μ11(μ20μ02)1/2.

For the sample, we define sy2 and sx2, the variances of y and x respectively assy2=n-1-1i=1nyi-y2andsx2=n-1-1i=1nxi-x2.Further we definesx2=(N-1)Sx2-(n-1)sx2(N-n-1)-nNx-X2(N-n-1)(N-n)which is also an unbiased estimator of Sx2 based on unobserved units. when the population variance Sx2 of the auxiliary variates x is known, Isaki [5] has proposed the estimator for Sy2 ast1=sy2Sx2sx2,The mean squared error of t1 up to the first degree of approximation is given byMSE(t1)=(N-n)Sy4(N-2)nβ2(y)+β2(x)-2(Kl+2Bρ2-D).Using Srivenkataramana [16] transformation, Biradar and Singh [2] proposed an alternative to Isaki [5] ratio estimator ast2=sy2sx2Sx2.The mean squared error of t2 up to second order moments is given asMSE(t2)=(N-n)(N-2)nSy4N-nN-n-12β2(y)+n-1N-n-12β2(x)-2(n-1)(N-n-1)2(N-n+1)(Kl+2Bρ2-D)-n(N-2)(N-n-1)2(N-n).when the population coefficient of Kurtosis β2(x), population coefficient of variation Cx along with population variance Sx2 is known, Kadilar and Cingi [6] have proposed the ratio type estimators for Sy2 ast3=sy2Sx2-Cxsx2-Cx,t4=sy2Sx2-β2(x)sx2-β2(x),t5=sy2Sx2β2(x)-Cxsx2β2(x)-Cx,andt6=sy2CxSx2-β2(x)Cxsx2-β2(x).Up to the first degree of approximation, the mean squared errors of t3,t4,t5 and t6 are respectively given asMSE(t3)=(N-n)Sy4(N-2)nβ2(y)+δ12β2(x)-2δ1(Kl+2Bρ2-D),MSE(t4)=(N-n)Sy4(N-2)nβ2(y)+δ22β2(x)-2δ2(Kl+2Bρ2-D),MSE(t5)=(N-n)Sy4(N-2)nβ2(y)+δ32β2(x)-2δ3(Kl+2Bρ2-D),MSE(t6)=(N-n)Sy4(N-2)nβ2(y)+δ42β2(x)-2δ4(Kl+2Bρ2-D).whereδi=Sx2/(Sx2-Cx),i=1Sx2/(Sx2-β2(x)),i=2Sx2β2(x)/(Sx2β2(x)-Cx),i=3Sx2Cx/(Sx2Cx-β2(x)),i=4.An alternative to ratio estimators given by Kadilar and Cingi [6] and a class of estimators for population variance using the same approach adopted by Srivenkataramana [16] are being proposed in this paper. The exact expressions for biases and mean squared errors of the proposed estimators are obtained. Also following Searls [9], an effort has been made to improve the proposed class of estimators by using information on the population variance Sx2 along with coefficient of variation Cx and coefficient of Kurtosis β2(x).

Section snippets

Proposed estimators

Adopting the approach of Srivenkataramana [16], we propose alternatives to Kadilar and Cingi [6] estimators for population variance Sy2 ast7=sy2sx2-CxSx2-Cx,t8=sy2sx2-β2(x)Sx2-β2(x),t9=sy2sx2β2(x)-CxSx2β2(x)-Cx,t10=sy2Cxsx2-β2(x)CxSx2-β2(x).The generalized version of t7,t8,t9 and t10 can be written astH=sy2asx2-baSx2-b,where (a,b) are suitably chosen constants and also may be the values of parameters such as Cx and β2(x) of the auxiliary variate x.

The exact expressions for biases of t7,t8,t

Improved proposed estimator

Following Searls [9], we propose class of estimators for estimating population variance of the variable under study astH(α)=Ksy2asx2-baSx2-b,where K is Searls [9] constants and can be determined later.

Using (1.3), the estimator tH(α) can be written astH(α)=Ksy2aSx2-ba(N-1)Sx2-(n-1)sx2(N-n-1)-nNx-X2(N-n-1)(N-n)-b.The exact bias expressions for tH(α) is obtained asB(tH)=Sy2(N-n)n(N-2)δK-Gl+2Hρ2+J+n(N-2)N-n-1-KbaSx2-b-1,where J=2Nn2-N2n2+2nN2+n2+n-5nNN(N-n)(N-n-1)(N-3).

The exact mean

Particular members of the proposed family of estimators

A large number of estimators of the population variance can be generated for different choices of aand bfrom the proposed family of estimators tH(α) given in (3.1).

Particular members of the proposed family of estimators tH(α) are given in the Table 4.1.

Efficiency comparisons

The variance of sy2, which is an unbiased estimator of Sy2Varsy2=(N-n)Sy4β2(y)n(N-2).From the comparisons of (5.1), (1.5), (1.7), (1.12), (1.13), (1.14), (1.15), (2.22), (2.23), (2.24), (2.25), (2.26) and (3.5), it is observed that the proposed estimator tH(α) is more efficient than usual

  • (i)

    sy2 ifK2δ21N-n-1+1δ2-1K2δ2β2(y)+δ2n-1N-n-12β2(x)-2δ2(n-1)PN-n-122+N-n-1δ-δ2n(N-2)N-n-12(N-n)+n(N-2)N-n-2δ(n-1)N-n-1P+n(N-2)N-n-2N-n-1Kϕ<0,

  • (ii)

    t1 ifK2δ21N-n-1+1δ2-1K2δ2β2(y)+δ2n-1N-n-12-1K2δ2β2(x)-2Pδ2(n-1

Empirical study

To exhibit the performance of the proposed estimators in comparison to other considered estimators, three natural population data sets are being considered. The description of populations are given below.

Population I: (Source: [4]). It consists of 278 villages or town/ward under Gajole Police Station of Malda district of West Bengal, India (in fact only those villages or towns/wards have been considered which are shown as inhabited and which are common to both census 1961 and census 1971,

Conclusion

Section 5 deals with the theoretical efficiency comparisons of considered estimators. This section provides the conditions under which proposed estimators have less mean squared error in comparisons to usual unbiased estimator sy2, [5] estimator t1, [2] estimator t2 and [6] ratio estimators tii=3,4,5,6 and some proposed estimators tH,tjj=7,8,9,10. It is observed from the Table 6.1 that the proposed estimators have highest percent relative efficiencies in comparisons to other considered

Acknowledgment

Authors are grateful to the learned referee for his valuable suggestions regarding the improvement of the paper.

References (26)

  • M.C. Agrawal et al.

    Unbiased ratio-type variance estimation

    Stat. Prob. Lett.

    (1995)
  • C. Kadilar et al.

    Ratio estimators for the population in simple and stratified random sampling

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2006)
  • R.S. Biradar et al.

    An alternative to ratio estimator of population variance

    Assam Stat. Rev.

    (1994)
  • R.S. Biradar et al.

    Predictive estimation of finite population variance

    Cal. Stat. Assoc. Bull.

    (1998)
  • A.K. Das, Contributions to the theory of sampling strategies based on auxiliary information (Ph.D. thesis), B.C.K.V.,...
  • C.T. Isaki

    Variance estimation using auxiliary information

    J. Am. Stat. Assoc.

    (1983)
  • M.N. Murthy

    Sampling Theory and Methods

    (1967)
  • B.N. Pandey et al.

    Modified product estimator using coefficient of variation of auxiliary variable

    Assam Stat. Rev.

    (1988)
  • D.T. Searls

    The utilization of a known coefficient of variation in the estimation procedure

    J. Am. Stat. Assoc.

    (1964)
  • H.P. Singh et al.

    Use of known correlation coefficient in estimating the finite population mean

    Stat. Trans.

    (2003)
  • D. Singh, P. Singh, P. Kumar, Hand Book on Sampling Methods. Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (ICAR),...
  • H.P. Singh et al.

    An alternative to ratio estimator of the population variance in sample surveys

    Stat. Trans.

    (2008)
  • H.P. Singh et al.

    A modified ratio estimator of population mean

    J. Indian Soc. Agri. Stat.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text