New alternatives to ratio estimators of population variance in sample surveys
Introduction
Auxiliary information is often used in sample surveys to increase the precision of the estimators. For estimating the population parameters such as population mean, population variance etc. several authors have often used information on different parameters such as population mean, coefficient of variation, coefficient of kurtosis and coefficient of skewness of the auxiliary variate. Many researchers including Searl [9], Sisodia and Dwivedi [14], Pandey and Dubey [8], Singh and Tailor [10], Singh et al. [13], Tailor and Tailor [21], Tailor and Sharma [20], Tailor et al. [22], Tailor et al. [23], Solanki et al. [15] and Tailor and Lone [18] have paid their attention towards the improved estimation of population mean of the variable under study. In spite the estimation of population mean of the study variate, estimation of the population variance using supplementary information on the auxiliary variate has also attracted the attention of the survey statisticians. The problem of estimating the population variance using auxiliary information has been discussed by various authors including [5], [24], [25], [26], [1], [2], [3], [17], [6], [12], [19] etc.
Let be a finite population of N units. Let be the variate observed on . The values of auxiliary variate x are known for all units of the population. A sample of size n is drawn from population U using simple random sampling without replacement. Let us definewhere and .
For the sample, we define and , the variances of and x respectively asFurther we definewhich is also an unbiased estimator of based on unobserved units. when the population variance of the auxiliary variates x is known, Isaki [5] has proposed the estimator for asThe mean squared error of up to the first degree of approximation is given byUsing Srivenkataramana [16] transformation, Biradar and Singh [2] proposed an alternative to Isaki [5] ratio estimator asThe mean squared error of up to second order moments is given aswhen the population coefficient of Kurtosis , population coefficient of variation along with population variance is known, Kadilar and Cingi [6] have proposed the ratio type estimators for asandUp to the first degree of approximation, the mean squared errors of and are respectively given aswhereAn alternative to ratio estimators given by Kadilar and Cingi [6] and a class of estimators for population variance using the same approach adopted by Srivenkataramana [16] are being proposed in this paper. The exact expressions for biases and mean squared errors of the proposed estimators are obtained. Also following Searls [9], an effort has been made to improve the proposed class of estimators by using information on the population variance along with coefficient of variation and coefficient of Kurtosis .
Section snippets
Proposed estimators
Adopting the approach of Srivenkataramana [16], we propose alternatives to Kadilar and Cingi [6] estimators for population variance asThe generalized version of and can be written aswhere are suitably chosen constants and also may be the values of parameters such as and of the auxiliary variate x.
The exact expressions for biases of
Improved proposed estimator
Following Searls [9], we propose class of estimators for estimating population variance of the variable under study aswhere is Searls [9] constants and can be determined later.
Using (1.3), the estimator can be written asThe exact bias expressions for is obtained aswhere .
The exact mean
Particular members of the proposed family of estimators
A large number of estimators of the population variance can be generated for different choices of aand bfrom the proposed family of estimators given in (3.1).
Particular members of the proposed family of estimators are given in the Table 4.1.
Efficiency comparisons
The variance of , which is an unbiased estimator of From the comparisons of (5.1), (1.5), (1.7), (1.12), (1.13), (1.14), (1.15), (2.22), (2.23), (2.24), (2.25), (2.26) and (3.5), it is observed that the proposed estimator is more efficient than usual
- (i)
if
- (ii)
if
Empirical study
To exhibit the performance of the proposed estimators in comparison to other considered estimators, three natural population data sets are being considered. The description of populations are given below.
Population I: (Source: [4]). It consists of 278 villages or town/ward under Gajole Police Station of Malda district of West Bengal, India (in fact only those villages or towns/wards have been considered which are shown as inhabited and which are common to both census 1961 and census 1971,
Conclusion
Section 5 deals with the theoretical efficiency comparisons of considered estimators. This section provides the conditions under which proposed estimators have less mean squared error in comparisons to usual unbiased estimator , [5] estimator , [2] estimator and [6] ratio estimators and some proposed estimators . It is observed from the Table 6.1 that the proposed estimators have highest percent relative efficiencies in comparisons to other considered
Acknowledgment
Authors are grateful to the learned referee for his valuable suggestions regarding the improvement of the paper.
References (26)
- et al.
Unbiased ratio-type variance estimation
Stat. Prob. Lett.
(1995) - et al.
Ratio estimators for the population in simple and stratified random sampling
Appl. Math. Comput.
(2006) - et al.
An alternative to ratio estimator of population variance
Assam Stat. Rev.
(1994) - et al.
Predictive estimation of finite population variance
Cal. Stat. Assoc. Bull.
(1998) - A.K. Das, Contributions to the theory of sampling strategies based on auxiliary information (Ph.D. thesis), B.C.K.V.,...
Variance estimation using auxiliary information
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
(1983)Sampling Theory and Methods
(1967)- et al.
Modified product estimator using coefficient of variation of auxiliary variable
Assam Stat. Rev.
(1988) The utilization of a known coefficient of variation in the estimation procedure
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
(1964)- et al.
Use of known correlation coefficient in estimating the finite population mean
Stat. Trans.
(2003)