An approximate solution for a neutral functional–differential equation with proportional delays

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.040Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, a novel algorithm based on reproducing kernel theory for neutral functional–differential equation with proportional delays is proposed. The advantages of the presented method are the establishment of complete ɛ-approximate solution theory and high precision of absolute error. Some examples are given to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the new method and some comparisons are made with the existing results.

Introduction

Functional–differential equations with proportional delays are usually referred as pantograph equations or generalized pantograph equations, the name of which was originated by Ockendon and Tayler in connection with the dynamics of a current collection system on an electric locomotive [1]. The pantograph equations occur in a wide variety of many phenomena in applied sciences, such as number theory, electrodynamics, astrophysics, nonlinear dynamical systems, probability theory on algebraic structure, quantum mechanics and cell growth [1], [2], [3].

In recent years, pantograph equations have been studied by many authors who have investigated both their analytical and numerical aspects. Here, we briefly review a limited number of them. In [4], [15], the multi-pantograph equations were investigated using Runge–Kutta method. The papers [5], [6], [16], [17] studied the numerical solutions of delay differential equations by collocation method. Authors of [7] considered using Chebyshev polynomials method to obtain the numerical solution of the pantograph equation. Sezer et al. [8], [9] obtained the approximate solution of the pantograph equation based on the Taylor method. In [10], Alomari et al. used homotopy analysis method to solve a class of delay differential equations. Recently, the authors in [11], [12] developed Variational iteration method and Homotopy perturbation method to solve neutral functional–differential equation with proportional delays, respectively. Moreover, Heydari et al. [13] solved pantograph equation with neutral term successfully by the method which consists of expanding the required approximate solution as the elements of Chebyshev cardinal functions.

In this paper, we employ a novel method named optimal residual method to solve the following neutral functional–differential equation with proportional delays, (u(t)+a(t)u(pmt))(m)=βu(t)+k=0m1bk(t)u(k)(pkt)+f(t),0tTwith the initial conditions k=0m1ciku(k)(0)=λi,i=0,1,,m1,where a and bk(k = 0, 1, …, m − 1) are given analytical functions, and β, pk, cik, λk denote given constants with 0 < pk < 1(k = 0, 1, …, m). Differing from the previous methods, here, we will build a complete ɛ-approximate solution theory based on reproducing kernel theory, and the ɛ-approximate solution can be easily obtained by solving normal equations.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce some mathematical preliminaries about the dense subset of W2n. Section 3 is devoted to applying optimal residual method for solving neutral functional-differential equation with proportional delays base on reproducing kernel theory. In Section 4, some numerical results are given to clarify the method, and comparisons are made with methods that were reported in other published works in the literature. Finally, a conclusion is given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

In this section, we will prove that {1, x, x2, …, xm + 1, cos kx, sin kx, k = 1, 2, ⋅⋅⋅} is a completely independent system of W2m+1.

Lemma 2.1

The space W1 = span{1, cos kx, sin kx, k = 1, 2, 3, ⋅⋅⋅} is a dense subset of L2[0, T]. (see [18]).

Put W2m+1W2m+1[0,T]={u(x)|u(m)(x)isanabsolutelycontinuousrealvaluedfunctionon[0,T]andu(m+1)(x)L2[0,T]},(u,v)=i=0mu(i)(0)v(i)(0)+0Tu(m+1)(x)v(m+1)(x)dx,u,vW2m+1,W=span{1,x,x2,,xm+1,coskx,sinkx,k=1,2,3,}.

Lemma 2.2

If any wW1, then0x(xt)mw(t)dtW.

Proof

Assume that w=a0+k

The ɛ-approximate solution of Eq. (1) with (2)

Put (Au)(t)=(u(t)+a(t)u(pmt))(m)βu(t)k=0m1bk(t)u(k)(pkt)(Biu)(t)=k=0m1ciku(k)(0),i=0,1,,m1.Then Eq. (1) with (2) turns into Au=fsubject to Biu=λi,i=0,1,,m1,where uW2m+1[0,T],fW21[0,T],λiR. A:W2m+1[0,T]W21[0,T],Bi:W2m+1[0,T]R are all bounded linear operators. And W2m+1[0,T],W21[0,T] are both reproducing kernel spaces defined in Section 2.

Assume Eq. (5) with (6) has an unique solution. In this section, we assume that {ϕj}j=1 is a completely independent system of W2m+1. For

Numerical experiments

In this part, some examples are provided to illustrate performance of the proposed method. For the sake of comparing purposes, we consider the same examples as used in [11].

Example 1

Consider the following first-order neutral functional–differential equation with proportional delay: {u(t)=u(t)+12u(t2)+12u(t2),0<t<1,u(0)=1.The exact solution is u(t) = et. In Table 1, we compare the absolute errors of the optimal residual method (for n = 4, 5, 6) with the ones for the two-stage order-one Runge–Kutta

Conclusion

In this paper, the optimal residual method based on reproducing kernel theory is employed successfully to study neutral functional–differential equations with proportional delays. Comparing with Runge–Kutta method and variational iteration method, the results of numerical examples demonstrate that the presented method is more accurate.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express thanks to the unknown referees for their careful reading and helpful comments. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11401139).

Cited by (6)

View full text