Elsevier

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volume 270, 1 November 2015, Pages 567-581
Applied Mathematics and Computation

Modified Chaplygin gas cosmology with observational constraints

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.056Get rights and content

Abstract

The spatially homogeneous and totally anisotropic Bianchi type-II space-time models with modified Chaplygin gas having the equation of state p=AρBρα, 0 ≤ A ≤ 1, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, where A, α and B are positive constants, have been investigated. It has been shown that the equation of state for such modified model is valid from the radiation era to the ΛCDM. The statefinder, which is the cosmological diagnostic pair {r, s} has been adopted to characterize different phases of the universe. The physical and geometrical properties of the corresponding cosmological models have been discussed. The observational constraints, essentially dependent on the hubble parameter H0 and deceleration parameter q0 have been investigated using 28 data points of H(z), SNe Ia and H(z)+ SNe Ia [57]. It has been seen that the average scale factor a(t) can be expanded in terms of an infinite convergent series around the current value of the average scale factor a0 using Taylor’s theorem, in which the current value of the deceleration parameter q0, the dimensionless jerk parameter j0, the snap parameter s0* and the lerk parameter ℓ0 appeared.

Introduction

The recent observational data [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] on the late-time acceleration of the universe and the existence of dark matter have posed a fundamental theoretical challenge to gravitational theories. Astronomical and cosmological observations, such as large-scale redshift surveys structure [4], [5] , the cosmic microwave background (CMB) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35] and Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) [8], [9] indicate that the observable universe experiences an accelerated expansion. The source of this acceleration is usually attributed to an exotic type of fluid with negative pressure called commonly dark energy (DE). Various kinds of dark energy models have been proposed such as cosmological constant [10], quintessence [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], k-essence [14], [15], [16], tachyon [17], [18], [19], phantom [20], [21], [22], dilatonic ghost condensate [23], quartessence [24], Chaplygin gas [25], quintom [26], holographic dark energy [27] and extra dimensions [28]. Various other types of DE cosmological models have been discussed by several authors [29], [30], [31]. The nature of the dark sector of the universe (i.e., dark energy and dark matter) remains a mystery. An economical and attractive idea to unify the dark sector of the universe is to consider it as a single component that acts as both dark energy and dark matter. One way to achieve the unification of dark energy and dark matter is by using the so-called Chaplygin gas. The pure Chaplygin gas or generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) is a perfect fluid which behaves like a pressureless fluid at an early stage and a cosmological constant at a later stage. Therefore, it would be important if a unified dark matter and dark energy scenario could be found, in which these two components are different candidates of a single fluid [32], [33], [34].

The GCG model [35] is an interesting candidate for the unification of the dark matter and dark energy. In the GCG approach an exotic background fluid is considered with the equation of state p=B/ρα, where B and α are positive constant, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. The case α=1 corresponds to the Chaplygin gas. The GCG model has been successfully confronted with many phenomenological tests such as Supernovae data, CMB data etc. The energy density behaves as a matter and as a cosmological constant at a later stage, is an attractive feature of these models at early times. In this work, it is assumed that the isotropic pressure p of the cosmological fluid obeys the modified Chaplygin gas equation of state [36], p=AρBρα,0A1,0α1,where A, B and α are universal positive constants. The equation of state with A=0 and α=1 known as Chaplygin gas (CG) was first introduced by Chaplygin to study the lifting forces upon the wing of the aeroplane in aerodynamics. Its generalized form with A=0 and α > 0 known as generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) was first introduced by Kamenshchik et al. [37] and Bento et al. [35]. The equation of state (1) corresponds to the radiation-dominated era when A=13 and ρ → ∞. The equation of state corresponds to ΛCDM model i.e., DE cosmological fluid with negative pressure when ρ → 0. Generally the modified Chaplygin equation of state corresponds to a mixture of ordinary matter and DE. For ρ=(BA)1α+1 the matter content is pure dust with p=0.

In order to differentiate between various dark energy models, a geometrical diagnostic pair {r, s} called statefinder, has been introduced in Sahni et al. [55]. The statefinder probes the expansion dynamics of the universe through the higher derivatives of the expansion factor a¨ and a. The statefinder pair defines two new cosmological parameters r and s in addition to the the Hubble parameter H and the deceleration parameter q, which is defined as r=aaH3,s=r13(q12),where q12.

Statefinder is a geometrical diagnostic, because it depends only on the expansion factor a. Its important property is that {r,s}={1,0} is a fixed point for the flat ΛCDM FRW cosmological model. Departure of a given DE model from this fixed point is a good way of establishing the ‘distance’ of this model from flat ΛCDM. Sami et al. [39] and Myrzakulov et al. [40] have also used statefinder to distinguish the different models of dark energy.

The spatially homogeneous and anisotropic cosmological models have a significant role in the description of the universe in the early stages of its evolution. The Bianchi type models have been studied by several authors [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52] in an attempt to understand better the observed small amount of anisotropy in the universe. The Bianchi type-II models have also been used to examine the role of certain anisotropic sources during the formation of the large-scale structure as we see in the universe today. Some of the Bianchi type cosmologies are the natural hosts of large scale magnetic fields, and therefore their study can shed light on the implications of cosmic magnetism for galaxy formation. The simplest Bianchi types model that contains the flat FRW universe may be taken as a special case of the Bianchi type-I space time.

In the present paper, a spatially homogeneous and anisotropic Bianchi type-II cosmological models with modified chaplygin gas have been discussed in two cases. The statefinder diagnostic pair {r, s} has been adopted to characterize different phases of the universe. The geometrical and physical behaviors of the models have also been discussed. The observational constraints, which are essentially dependent on the hubble parameter H0 and deceleration parameter q0 have been investigated using 28 data points of H(z), SNe Ia and H(z)+ SNe Ia [57]. The Taylor’s expansions of the average scale factors a(t) around a0 have also been investigated in both cases.

Section snippets

Metric and field equations

The Bianchi type-II metric is given by ds2=dt2a12(dxzdy)2a22dy2a32dz2,where the metric potentials a1, a2 and a3 are functions of cosmic time t. The universe is assumed to be filled with a distribution of matter represented by the energy-momentum tensor of a perfect fluid. Tij=(ρ+p)uiujpgij,where ρ is the energy density of cosmic matter and p is its isotropic pressure, ui is the fluid flow vector field which form an expanding geodesic and hypersurface-orthogonal congruence and given by ui=(1

Solution of the field equations

Subtracting Eq. (10) from (9), we get ddt(a2˙a2a3˙a3)+(a2˙a2a3˙a3)(a1˙a1+a2˙a2+a3˙a3)=0.From Eqs. (12) and (26), we get ddt(a2˙a2a3˙a3)+(a2˙a2a3˙a3)V˙V=0,the second integral of Eq. (27), we get a2a3=dexp(x0dtV),where d, x0 are integrating constants.

Now we assume that the expansion scalar Θ is proportional to one of the components of the shear tensor σ, say σ11 [53]. The motivation behind this assumption is the observations of the velocity-redshift relation for extragalactic sources, which

Conclusion

In this paper, we study the cosmological solutions of spatially homogeneous and totally anisotropic Bianchi type-II universe filled with modified Chaplygin gas having the equation of state p=AρB/ρα, where 0 ≤ A ≤ 1, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 and B is a positive constant for small and large values of the scale factors. The different observational data shows that the early universe was anisotropic. This data also suggests that the dark energy is responsible for gearing up the universe about 5–6 billian years

Acknowledgments

One of the authors J. K. Singh expresses his thanks to CTP, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India for its kind hospitality and providing necessary facilities during the work. The fruitful discussions with Prof. M. Sami, Prof. Shri Ram and Mohd. Shahalam are acknowledged. The authors are also grateful to the referees for their constructive comments.

References (68)

  • G.W. Gibbons

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2002)
  • R.R. Caldwell

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2002)
  • G. Leon

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2010)
  • A. Kamenshchik et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2001)
  • B. Feng et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2006)
  • A. Kamenshchik

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2000)
  • J.K. Singh et al.

    Appl. Math. comput.

    (2015)
  • S. Capozziello

    Phys. Lett. B

    (2006)
  • S. Perlmutter

    Nature

    (1998)
  • S. Perlmutter

    Astrophys. J.

    (1999)
  • A.G. Riess

    Astron. J.

    (1998)
  • N.A. Bachall et al.

    Science

    (1999)
  • M. Tegmark et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2004)
  • D. Miller et al.

    Astrophys. J. Lett.

    (1999)
  • C.L. Bennett et al.

    Astrophys. J. Supp.

    (2003)
  • S.L. Briddle et al.

    Science

    (1999)
  • D.N. Spergel et al.

    Astrophys. J. Supp.

    (2003)
  • P.J.E. Peebles et al.

    Rev. Mod. Phys.

    (2003)
  • B. Ratra et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (1988)
  • R.R. Caldwell et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1998)
  • M. Sami et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2003)
  • C. Armendariz-Picon et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2001)
  • T. Chiba

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2002)
  • R.J. Scherrer

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2004)
  • A. Sen

    J. High Energy Phys.

    (2002)
  • A. Sen

    J. High Energy Phys.

    (2002)
  • E. Elizade et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2004)
  • J.M. Cline et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2004)
  • Gasperini

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2002)
  • P. Horava et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2000)
  • M. Rogatko et al.

    Phys. Rev. D

    (2004)
  • J.K. Singh et al.

    Int. J. Theor. Phys.

    (2014)
  • J.K. Singh et al.

    Int. J. Theor. Phys.

    (2014)
  • J.K. Singh et al.

    Int. J. Theor. Phys.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text