Pure Bt-crop and mixed seed sowing strategies for optimal economic profit in the face of pest resistance to pesticides and Bt-corn
Introduction
Insects and other pests seriously affect crop yields, with consequent economic losses for farmers. Therefore, pest control is an issue for agricultural administrative departments. In the early stages of pest control, chemical control, generally the spraying of pesticides, had a very important role. However, due to the high frequency and regular use over the long term of pesticide sprays, some negative factors have resulted such as environmental pollution and pest resistance to pesticides.
The European Corn Borer (ECB) Ostrinia nubilalis is a major pest of cereal crops including corn (maize) Zea mays, which can cause serious losses to farmers. In order to control ECB and avoid the negative effects of high frequency spraying of pesticides, biotechnology companies have produced genetically modified corn grown from seeds with a toxin gene from the soil-dwelling bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) inserted, which can withstand ECB attacks. The toxic gene in the plants produces delta endotoxins which are fatal to insects susceptible to them that feed on the crop [1], [2].
However, pest resistance, the adaptation of the pest population to some pesticides or to the toxin in Bt-corn thus decreasing its susceptibility, has emerged as a serious problem. With the evolution of pest resistance, farmers’ losses are increasing year by year. According to a survey, in the 1940s, farmers in the USA lost 7% of their crops to pests. Since the 1980s, the percentage lost has increased to 13%, even though more pesticides are being used, and more than 500 species of pests have developed resistance to pesticides since 1945 [3], [4], [5].
Scientists have responded by developing various insecticide resistance management (IRM) strategies, aimed at slowing down the build-up of pesticide resistance in pest populations and managing established resistant pest populations [6], [7]. These strategies may be implemented either at input level (Bt-corn seed and non-Bt-corn seed mixes, pesticide mixtures or gene stacking for pest-resistant transgenic varieties) or at farm level (refuges, alternation of pesticides, changes in cultural practices, integrated pest management (IPM)) [8], [9]. In economic terms, the stock of pest susceptibility to a given pesticide is a beneficial non-renewable resource, and IRM strategies delay the depletion of this stock [10], by methods such as mixed planting of Bt-corn with non-Bt-corn. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US Department of Agriculture (DA) have required that in areas planted with Bt-corn, at least 20% of the area should be planted with non-Bt-corn as an IRM strategy [11], which we will refer to as the US EPA mixed strategy.
We will use mathematical models to answer the question what is the optimal strategy for pest control with economic benefits as the aim? Mathematical models have been used extensively in studies of pest control, including for IRM [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Liang et al. used a mathematical model to study the switching of pesticides as an IRM strategy and estimated the optimal switching strategy and the optimal switching time with different pest control aims [17]. The balance of the number of natural enemies released and the evolution of pest resistance were studied, and the optimal numbers of natural enemies to be released were given [18], [19]. Considering the cost of pest control, yields of corn and so on, Liang and Tang modelled a benefit function with a pest control model, and the optimal pesticide spraying time and the optimal economic threshold were investigated [16]. In that study, they assumed that pest resistance was negligible. Linacre and Thompson considered four IRM strategies for Bt-corn plants and studied the net present value for four strategies with mathematical models [11]. Moreover, what farmers want to know are what are the main factors affecting the net present value, and what is the optimal planting ratio of Bt-corn and non-Bt-corn?
To answer the former questions, in this manuscript, we modelled a pest’s growth with evolution of pest resistance to Bt-corn. Under the pest growth model and considering the cost of pest control, yield of corn, price of corn, and so on, we investigated the net present values under two corn planting strategies: a pure Bt-corn strategy and the US EPA mixed strategy. The effects of Bt-corn on the mortality rate of the pest, the initial density of the pest population, the intrinsic growth rate and the carrying capacity of the pest on the net present value were analysed. Finally, we studied the optimal planting ratio of Bt-corn and non-Bt-corn under a mixed planting strategy. Whilst the above introduction has concentrated on Bt-corn as being genetically modified sweet corn or maize, our models are general and can refer to any genetically modified corn in the English rather than the American sense of corn, encompassing crops such as wheat Triticum spp., barley Hordeum vulgare, oats Avena sativa etc. as well as other varieties of genetically modified crop and their associated pests (resistant or not).
Section snippets
The model
In this section, we will provide a simple pest growth model based on the classical Beverton–Holt model. Evolution of pest resistance to Bt-corn will be developed according to the pest growth model and the proportion of resistant pests in the total pest population. One of our main purposes is to investigate the economic profit of farmers, therefore we will propose an economic function based on the yields of corn, costs and so on.
Analysis of the net present values
In this section, we will investigate the NPVs under the pure Bt-corn planting strategy and under the mixed planting strategy and analyse the effects of the main parameters on the NPVs and their relations with the NPVs under each of the two strategies. In deriving our results, we used the parameter values listed in Table 1.
Effect of the proportion of the field planted with non-Bt-corn α on NPVMix
From Section 3.2, we have concluded that for the long term view, the net present value with the mixed strategy is more optimal than the net present value with the pure Bt-corn strategy. What the administrators of agricultural departments need to know is how does the proportion of the field planted with non-Bt-corn α affect the net present value over a time of n years/times for the mixed strategy? To answer this question, we turn our attention to (2.15). Differentiating Eq. (2.15) with respect
Discussion
Corn is a major agricultural crop. However, there is a significant loss of corn crops because of attacks by the European Corn Borer. Recently, farmers have begun to plant Bt-corn for controlling ECB, thus reducing their corn crop losses. However, resistance of ECB pests to Bt-corn has developed quickly due to large areas having been planted with Bt-corn for a long time. Many departments of agriculture have proposed suggestions for fighting ECB pest resistance to Bt-corn [28] such as the
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 11401360, 11371030, 11171199, 11471201), and by a General Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M552406).
References (36)
- et al.
Dynamics of insect resistance in Bt-corn
Ecol. Model.
(2004) - et al.
Modeling resistance to genetic control of insects
J. Theor. Biol.
(2011) - et al.
Physiologically based demographics of Bt cotton-pest interactions i. pink bollworm resistance, refuge and risk
Ecol. Model.
(2006) - et al.
Analysis of a stage-structured predator-prey system with birth pulse and impulsive harvesting at different moments
Nonlinear Anal.: Real World Appl.
(2011) - et al.
Optimal dosage and economic threshold of multiple pesticide applications for pest control
Math. Comput. Model.
(2010) - et al.
Analytical methods for detecting pesticide switches with evolution of pesticide resistance
Math. Biosci.
(2013) - et al.
Models for determining how many natural enemies to release inoculatively in combinations of biological and chemical control with pesticide resistance
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(2015) - et al.
An integrated pest management model with delayed responses to pesticide applications and its threshold dynamics
Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.
(2012) - et al.
Flow of genetic information through agricultural ecosystems: a generic modelling framework with application to pesticide-resistance weeds and genetically modified crops
Ecol. Model.
(2004) - et al.
Multiple attractors of host-parasitoid models with integrated pest management strategies: eradication, persistence and outbreak
Theor. Popul. Biol.
(2008)
Optimum timing for integrated pest management: modelling rates of pesticide application and natural enemy releases
J. Theor. Biol.
The dynamics of an epidemic model for pest control with impulsive effect
Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.
Optimal timing of interventions in fishery resource and pest management
Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.
A delayed epidemic model with stage-structure and pulses for pest management strategy
Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl.
Overview of insecticide resistance
Incorporating Resistance in Pesticide Management: A Dynamic Regional Approach
Cited by (7)
A comparative assessment of the unintended effects of genetic modification on Bt corn
2021, Fresenius Environmental BulletinOptimal harvesting of a competitive n-species stochastic model with delayed diffusions
2019, Mathematical Biosciences and EngineeringA discrete host-parasitoid model with development of pesticide resistance and ipm strategies
2018, Journal of Biological DynamicsProfessional training in organic food production: a cross-country experience
2017, International Journal of Information and Learning Technology