Unconditional superconvergence analysis for nonlinear hyperbolic equation with nonconforming finite element

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.01.050Get rights and content

Abstract

Nonlinear hyperbolic equation is studied by developing a linearized Galerkin finite element method (FEM) with nonconforming EQ1rot element. A time-discrete system is established to split the error into two parts which are called the temporal error and the spatial error, respectively. The temporal error is proved skillfully which leads to the analysis for the regularity of the time-discrete system. The spatial error is derived τ-independently with order O(h2+hτ) in broken H1-norm. The final unconditional superclose result of u with order O(h2+τ2) is deduced based on the above achievements. The two typical characters of this nonconforming EQ1rot element (see Lemma 1 below) play an important role in the procedure of proof. At last, a numerical example is provided to support the theoretical analysis. Here, h is the subdivision parameter, and τ, the time step.

Introduction

Consider the following nonlinear hyperbolic equation: {utt·(a(u)u)=f(u),(X,t)Ω×(0,T],u=0,(X,t)Ω×(0,T],u(X,0)=u0(X),ut(X,0)=u1(X),XΩ,where ΩR2 is a rectangle with the boundary ∂Ω, 0 < T < ∞ and X=(x,y), a(u), f(u), u0(X) are known smooth functions. Assume that a(u) is twicely continuously differentiable with respective to u, 0 < a0a(u) ≤ a1 for certain positive constants a0, a1. In addition, both auu(u) and f(u) are globally Lipschitz continuous in u.

In physics, the hyperbolic equations are important partial differential equations in describing the propagation of sound and electromagnetic wave and so on. Various numerical methods have been investigated on such problems (refer to [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] for linear cases). Indeed, a lot of studies on the nonlinear hyperbolic equation, from both theoretical and practical point of view, are useful in solving the problems of nonlinear vibration and permeation fluid mechanics. For instance, Zhou et al. [11] and Chen [12] discussed the H1-Galerkin expanded mixed FEM and usual mixed FEM respectively, and both of them arrived at optimal error estimates. Shi and Li [13] obtained the superclose estimate for the nonlinear hyperbolic equations with nonlinear boundary condition through interpolation, and the global superconvergence result was deduced based on the interpolated postprocessing technique. The Galerkin alternating-direction procedure for a kind of three-dimensional nonlinear hyperbolic equation was considered in [14] and the error estimates in H1 norm and L2 norm were demonstrated by using a priori estimate. However, to study the time-dependent optimal error estimates for a nonlinear physical system, the boundedness of numerical solution Uhn in L-norm or a stronger norm is often required, and the inverse inequality is usually employed to deal with such issue, which will result in some time-step restrictions, such as τ=O(h),hr=O(τ)(1rk+1,k0) and τ=O(h2) in [12] and [14], respectively. In fact, in the researches of other nonlinear evolution equations also need some restrictions of τ, such as nonlinear parabolic equation [15], [16], nonlinear Sobolev problems [17], [18], nonlinear Schrödinger equations [19], [20] and Navier–Stokes equations [21], [22], and so on.

To overcome such deficiency, [23] constructed a corresponding time-discrete system to split the error into two parts, the temporal error and the spatial error. Then the spatial error reduces to the unconditional boundedness of numerical solution in L-norm. Subsequently, this so-called splitting technique was also applied to other equations [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. In the above studies they only arrived at optimal estimates. Recently, Shi [30] made use of the nature of the equation to get the unconditional superclose for Sobolev equation with conforming mixed FEM. However, as far as we know, there is no consideration about the nonlinear hyperbolic equation.

The main aim of the present work is to discuss the unconditional superconvergence estimate for (1.1) with nonconforming EQ1rot element [31], [32]. Firstly, we develop a linearized FE scheme with second order, which is different from the traditional Crank–Nicolson scheme, and then motivated by the idea of splitting technique in [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], a time-discrete system with solution Un is introduced to split the error unUhn into the temporal error unUn and the spatial error UnUhn. Secondly, we obtain the temporal error which reduces to the regularity of Un and derive the unconditional superclose result of u in broken H1-norm with order O(h2+τ2) by arriving at the spatial error with order O(h2+hτ) directly. At last, some numerical results show the validity of the theoretical analysis. We also point out that the analysis presented herein is also valid to some other nonconforming FEs possessing the two properties in Lemma 1 and the assumption of the condition about ∂Ω is less stringent here compared with that in [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] where it is smooth enough.

Throughout this paper, we denote the natural inner product in L2(Ω) by (·, ·) and the norm by ‖·‖0, and let H01(Ω)={vH1(Ω):v|Ω=0}. Further, we use the classical Sobolev spaces Wm, p(Ω), 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, denoted by Wm, p, with norm ‖·‖m, p. When p=2, we simply write ‖·‖m, p as ‖·‖m. Besides, we define the space Lp(a, b; Y) with the norm fLp(a,b;Y)=(abf(·,t)Ypdt)1p, and if p=, the integral is replaced by the essential supremum.

Section snippets

Nonconforming FE approximation scheme

Let Ω be a rectangle in (x, y) plane with edges parallel to the coordinate axes, Γh be a regular rectangular subdivision. Given KΓh, set the four vertices and edges be ai,i=14 and li=aiai+1¯,i=14(mod4), respectively. Then the EQ1rot finite element space Vh is defined as [32]: Vh={vh;vh|Kspan{1,x,y,x2,y2},F[vh]ds=0,FK,KΓh},where [vh] stands for the jump of vh across the edge F if F is an internal edge, and vh itself if F is a boundary edge. Let Ih: H1(Ω) → Vh be the associated

Error estimates for the time-discrete system

In this section, we begin by introducing the following time-discrete system: {¯ttUn·(a(U^n)Un,14)=f(U^n),XΩ,n>2,Un=0,XΩ,n2.When n=2, we set U2,02U1+U0τ2·(a(U¯1)U2,0+2U1+U04)=f(U¯1),followed by ¯ttU1·(a(U2,0+U02)U1,14)=f(U2,0+U02),where U2,0=0,forXΩ,U0=u0 and U1=(u0+u1τ+12utt(0)τ2). We can get utt(0) by utt(0)=·(a(u0)u0)+f(u0), where u0 is a known function and such idea can be found in [33].

The above time-discrete system (3.1)–(3.3) can be viewed as a system of linear

Superclose result for the second order fully discrete system

In this section, we will establish a τ-independent estimate for h(IhU¯nU¯hn)0=O(h2+hτ), which results in the final unconditional result of h(Ihu¯nU¯hn)0 with order O(h2+τ2). A pervading strategy throughout the error analysis in the rest of this paper is splitting the error to a sum of two terms: U2,0Uh2,0=U2,0IhU2,0+IhU2,0Uh2,0r2,0+θ2,0,UiUhi=UiIhUi+IhUiUhiri+θi,i=0,1,2,,n.

Theorem 2

Let Un andUhn be the solutions of (1.1) and (2.4)(2.6) respectively, forn=1,2,,N, under the conditions of

Numerical results

In this section, we consider the hyperbolic equation: {utt·(a(u)u)f(u)=g(X,t),(X,t)Ω×(0,T],u=0,(X,t)Ω×(0,T],u(X,0)=u0(X),ut(X,0)=u1(X),XΩ,with Ω=[0,1]×[0,1],a(u)=sinu+0.1,f(u)=u2 and g(X, t) is chosen corresponding to the exact solution u=etxy(1x)(1y). A uniform rectangular partition with m+1 nodes in each direction is used in our computation. We solve the system by the linearized Galerkin method with EQ1rot. To confirm our error estimates in broken H1-norm, we choose τ=h and the

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11271340).

References (33)

  • R.I. Fernandes et al.

    An alternating direction Galerkin method for a class of second-order hyperbolic equations in two space variables

    SIAM J. Numer. Anal.

    (1991)
  • A.K. Pani et al.

    Numerical methods for hyperbolic and parabolic integro-differential equations

    J. Integr. Equ. Appl.

    (1992)
  • GuoH. et al.

    Superconvergence of the split least-squares method for second-order hyperbolic equations

    Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ.

    (2014)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Finite volume element method for second order hyperbolic equations

    Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod

    (2008)
  • ShiD.Y. et al.

    Superconvergence analysis of splitting positive definite nonconforming mixed finite element method for pseudo-hyperbolic equations

    Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser.

    (2013)
  • ZhouZ. et al.

    An galerkin expanded mixed finite element approximation of second-order nonlinear hyperbolic equations

    Abstr. Appl. Anal.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text