Elsevier

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volume 309, 15 September 2017, Pages 27-30
Applied Mathematics and Computation

Short Communication
Principal minor version of Matrix-Tree theorem for mixed graphs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.034Get rights and content

Abstract

In Yu, et al. (2017), an analytical expression of the determinant of the Hermitian (quasi-)Laplacian matrix of mixed graphs has been proven. In this paper, we are going to extend those results and derive an analytical expression for the principal minors of the Hermitian (quasi-)Laplacian matrix, which is the principal minor version of the Matrix-Tree theorem.

Introduction

Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a simple undirected of Mechatronics and Biomedical Computer Science graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A mixed graph M is obtained from an undirected graph G by orienting a subset of its edges. We call G the underlying graph of M, denoted by Mu. The vertex set of M is denoted by V(M), which equals V(G). The edge set E(M) is the union of the set of undirected edges E0(M) and the set of directed edges (arcs) E1(M). We distinguish an undirected edge by xy, while the directed edge (arcs) is to be xy, if the orientation is from x to y. If we do not consider any direction, we just write xy is an edge of M.

Similar to the adjacency matrix of undirected graphs, Liu and Li [6] and Guo and Mohar [4] independently introduced a definition for the adjacency matrix of a mixed graphs as follows. The Hermitian adjacency matrix of a mixed graph M of order n is an n × n matrix H(M)=(hkl), where hkl=hlk=i (i=1), if there exists an orientation from vk to vl and hkl=hlk=1, if there exists an edge between vk and vl without any orientation; otherwise hkl=0.

The Hermitian Laplacian matrix L(M) of a mixed graph M has been introduced in [9]. It’s defined by D(M)H(M) where D(M)=diag(d1,d2,,dn)is a diagonal matrix and di is the degree of the vertex vi in the underlying graph Mu. The matrix Q(M)=D(M)+H(M) is called the Hermitian quasi-Laplacian matrix of M, which has been introduced in [10]. Obviously these two matrices are Hermitian and all eigenvalues are real. Let S(M)=(ske) be a n × m matrix indexed by the vertex and the edge of the mixed graph M, where ske is a complex number and |ske|=1 or 0. Moreover, ske={sle,ifvkvli·sle,ifvkvli·sle,ifvkvl0,otherwise.It is evident that S(M) is not unique. A matrix S(M) is referred to as incidence matrix of M. Moreover, L(M)=S(M)S*(M) and L(M) is positive semi-definite. A mixed graph is called Laplacian singular if its Hermitian Laplacian matrix is singular. Otherwise, it is Laplacian non-singular. Up to now, there has been only little research activity towards investigating the Hermitian spectra of a mixed graph (see [2], [4], [6], [8], [9], [10]).

A i1ik-walk W in a mixed M is a sequence W:vi1vi2vik of vertices such that for 1sk1 we have visvis+1 or visvis+1 or visvis+1. A i1ik-walk W is called even (odd) if k is even (odd). The value of a mixed walk W=v1v2v3vl is h(W)=h12h23h(l1)l. A mixed walk is positive or negative if h(W)=1 or h(W)=1, respectively. A mixed walk is called imaginary if h(W)=±i. Note that for one direction the value of a mixed walk or a mixed cycle is α; for the reverse direction its value is α¯. Thus, if the value of a mixed cycle is 1 (resp. 1) for one direction, then its value is 1 (resp. 1) for the reverse direction. In such situations, we just call this mixed cycle a positive (negative) mixed cycle without mentioning any direction. A graph is positive (resp. negative) if each of it’s mixed cycles is positive (resp. negative). An induced subgraph of M is an induced subgraph of its underlying graph G with the same orientation. For a subgraph H of M, let MH be the subgraph obtained from M by deleting all vertices of H and all incident edges. For V1V(M), MV1 is the subgraph obtained from M by deleting all vertices in V1 and all their incident edges.

Bapat [1] introduced a real Laplacian matrix on mixed graph and investigated the Matrix-Tree Theorem based on this matrix. Inspired by Bapat et al. [1], we here study the same question in terms of the Hermitian (quasi-)Laplacian matrix.

Section snippets

Hermitian Laplacian matrix of mixed graphs

To prove the main result, we apply the definition of a substructure of a graph. This definition can be found in [1], [3]. Let M be a mixed graph. A substructure R of M is simply a pair (VR, ER) where VRV(M), ERE(M). Suppose we have given a substructure; then, we may delete some of the vertices but retain the edges incident to those vertices and their orientation; equally we could delete some edges and their orientations, or possibly both. In this case, however, we will retain at least one

Hermitian quasi-Laplacian matrix and Matrix-Tree theorem

Let T(M)=(tke) be a n × m matrix indexed by the vertex and the edge of the mixed graph M, where tke is a complex number and |tke|=1 or 0. Moreover, tke={tle,ifvkvli·tle,ifvkvli·tle,ifvkvl0,otherwise.As shown in [10], Q(M)=T(M)T*(M) and Q(M) is positive semi-definite. A mixed graph is quasi-Laplacian singular if its quasi-Laplacian matrix is singular. Otherwise, the mixed graph is quasi-Laplacian non-singular. Similar to the case for the Hermitian Laplacian matrix, the principle minor

Acknowledgments

Guihai Yu is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11301302), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Nos. 2013M530869, 2014T70210), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (No.BS2013SF009). Hui Qu is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11301302), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (No.BS2013SF009). Matthias Dehmer thanks the Austrian Science Funds for supporting this work (project P26142).

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text