Some new spectral bounds for graph irregularity
Introduction
All graphs throughout this paper are finite, undirected and simple. Let G be such a graph with vertex set and edge set E(G). Denote by dG(vi) (or simply, di) the degree of vertex vi in G, . Let be the degree sequence of G. We also write Δ(G) and δ(G) for the maximum vertex degree and the minimum vertex degree of G, respectively. A graph G is said to be regular if .
The adjacency matrix of a graph G is where elements if the vertices vi and vj in G are adjacent, and otherwise. The Laplacian matrix of G is defined to be where D(G) is the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees of G. If G has no isolated vertices, then the normalized version of L(G) is defined as . It is well known that both L(G) and are positive semi-definite matrices, and hence their eigenvalues (always known as the Laplacian eigenvalues and the normalized Laplacian eigenvalues of G, respectively) are nonnegative real numbers, which could be ordered by μ1(G) ≥ μ2(G) ≥ ⋅⋅⋅ ≥ μn(G) and ν1(G) ≥ ν2(G) ≥ ⋅⋅⋅ ≥ νn(G), respectively. For more details regarding the Laplacian eigenvalues and the normalized Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph, one may refer to [5], [6].
In 1997, Albertson [2] defined the imbalance of an edge as and the irregularity of a graph G as Clearly, for a connected graph G, if and only if G is regular, and for a non-regular graph G, irr(G) is a measure of the defect of regularity of G. In [2], Albertson first proved the following upper bound on irr(G): which was later improved by Abdo et al. [1] as
On the other hand, Zhou and Luo [17] showed that if G is a graph with n vertices and m edges, then where which is referred to as the first Zagreb index. Remark that this index and the second Zagreb index, defined by are two of the oldest and most investigated topological graph indices in Chemical Graph Theory, for details about the mathematical theory and the chemical applications of the Zagreb indices one can see [7], [8], [10], [14], [15], [16] and the references cited therein. It is also worth mentioning that in [8] Fath–Tabar established several obvious connections between the sum in (1.1) and the (first and second) Zagreb indices, and based on these connections he named the sum in (1.1) the third Zagreb index and denoted it by M3(G). However, in the rest of the paper, we shall use its older name, i.e., the irregularity of a graph G, and denote it by irr(G).
There also have been some other upper bounds on irr(G) obtained by several authors such as Hansen and Mélot [11], Henning and Rautenbach [12], and Fath–Tabar [8]. Strictly speaking, these bounds, together with the Zhou–Luo bound (1.2), are noncomparable, but the Zhou-Luo bound (1.2) seems to be much sharper than the others for most graphs. Recently, by utilizing the spectral techniques, Goldberg made a further improvement upon the Zhou–Luo bound (1.2).
Theorem 1.1 (Goldberg [9]) If G is a graph on n vertices and with m edges, then
In this paper, by means of the Laplacian eigenvalues and the normalized Laplacian eigenvalues of G, we establish some new spectral upper bounds for irr(G). We then compare these new bounds with the Goldberg bound (1.3), and it turns out that our bounds are better in most cases. We also give two spectral lower bounds on irr(G).
Section snippets
Preliminaries
Let Kn and as usual, denote the complete graph and the complete bipartite graph with n vertices, respectively. Denote by G ∪ H the vertex-disjoint union of two graphs G and H. In particular, kG stands for the vertex-disjoint union of k copies of G. Let G∨H be the graph obtained from G ∪ H by adding all possible edges joining the vertices in G with those in H. Denote by the complement of a graph G.
We now present some results that will be used in the next section.
Lemma 2.1 (see [13]) If G
Bounds on irr(G) involving Laplacian eigenvalues
By using Lemma 2.4, we may establish upper and lower bounds for irr(G) involving the Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph G.
Theorem 3.1 If G is a graph with n vertices, m edges and degree sequence where d1 ≤ d2 ≤ ⋅⋅⋅ ≤ dn, then
Proof Without loss of generality, assume that for . Noting that d1 ≤ d2 ≤ ⋅⋅⋅ ≤ dn and, for any two positive integers s < r,
we have
Comparisons and conclusions
To compare the upper bounds in Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 with the Goldberg bound (1.3) (i.e., the upper bound in Theorem 1.1), we have computed these three upper bounds (together with the exact values of irr(G) and the lower bounds in Theorems 3.1 and 3.3) for all the 112 connected graphs on 6 vertices (for the graphs see Table A3 in [6], pp. 301–304, and for the computational results see Table 1 in the appendix of this paper).
Before reporting our comparison, we first mention an observation by
Acknowledgments
The authors are extremely grateful to the referees and editors for their positive comments and valuable suggestions which have contributed to the final preparation of the paper. This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11501133, 11571101, 11301085), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (Nos. 2016GXNSFAA380293, 2014GXNSFBA118008), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M572252).
References (17)
- et al.
On the irregularity of bipartite graphs
Discrete Math.
(2007) Laplacian matrices of graphs: a survey
Linear Algebra Appl.
(1994)- H. Abdo, N. Cohen, D. Dimitrov, Bounds and computation of irregularity of a graph, 2012, Preprint:...
The irregularity of a graph
ARS Comb.
(1997)- et al.
Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of a graph
Linear Multilinear Algebra
(1985) Algebraic Graph Theory (2nd Ed.)
(1993)Spectral Graph Theory
Amer. Math. Soc. (Providence)
(1997)- et al.
An Introduction to the Theory of Graph Spectra
(2010)
Cited by (15)
Lower bounds on the irregularity of trees and unicyclic graphs
2023, Discrete Applied MathematicsGraph irregularity and its measures
2019, Applied Mathematics and ComputationStepwise irregular graphs
2018, Applied Mathematics and ComputationCitation Excerpt :The Albertson index was applied to a variety of classes of graphs and found numerous applications (see the recent works [1,2,4,18,19,21,22,26] and the references quoted therein). It should be mentioned that in the mathematical literature, several other irregularity indices have also been investigated [3,12,16,23]. [6]
Irregularity Measure of Graphs
2023, Journal of MathematicsOn Certain Topological Indices of Graphs
2022, SSRN