Elsevier

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volume 332, 1 September 2018, Pages 189-196
Applied Mathematics and Computation

Neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number of planar graphs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Let G = (V(G), E(G)) be a graph and ϕ be a proper k-total coloring of G. Set fϕ(v)=uvE(G)ϕ(uv)+ϕ(v), for each v ∈ V(G). If fϕ(u) ≠ fϕ(v) for each edge uv ∈ E(G), the coloring ϕ is called a k-neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring of G. The smallest integer k in such a coloring of G is the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number, denoted by χΣ(G). In this paper, by using the famous Combinatorial Nullstellensatz, we determine χΣ(G) for any planar graph G with Δ(G) ≥ 13.

Introduction

The terminology and notation used but undefined in this paper can be found in [2]. In this paper, we only consider simple, finite and undirected graphs. Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a graph with maximum degree Δ(G). Let dG(v) or simply d(v) denote the degree of a vertex v in G. A vertex v is a tvertex (t+vertex, tvertex) if d(v)=t (d(v) ≥ t, d(v) ≤ t). Let dt(v) (dt(v), dt+(v)) denote the number of t-vertices (t-vertices, t+-vertices) adjacent to v. Let N(v) denote the neighbor set of the vertex v of G. Let G=(V(G),E(G),F(G)) be a plane graph. An l-face f=v1v2vlF(G) is a (b1,b2,,bl)-face, if vi is a bi-vertex, for i=1,2,,l.

Given a graph G and a proper k-total coloring ϕ : V(G)E(G){1,2,,k}. The coloring ϕ is a k-neighbor sum (set) distinguishing total coloring if fϕ(u) ≠ fϕ(v)(Sϕ(u) ≠ Sϕ(v)) for each edge uv ∈ E(G), where fϕ(v)(Sϕ(v)) is the sum (set) of colors on the edges incident with v and the color on the vertex v. The smallest number k in such a coloring of graph G is the neighbor sum (set) distinguishing total chromatic number, denoted by χΣ(G)(χa(G)). Clearly, for any graph G, χa(G)χΣ(G). All colorings considered in this paper are proper colorings. Zhang et al. [25] proposed the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1.1 [25]

For any graph G, χa(G)Δ(G)+3.

Huang and Wang [8] showed that Conjecture 1.1 holds for planar graphs with Δ(G) ≥ 11, which was extended to Δ(G) ≥ 10 by Cheng et al. [4]. Wang and Huang [21] showed that if G is a planar graph with Δ(G) ≥ 13, then χa(G)Δ(G)+2, meanwhile, they proved that if G has no adjacent Δ(G)-vertices, then χa(G)=Δ(G)+1.

For k-neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring (or simply k-tnsd-coloring), Pilśniak and Woźniak [12] gave the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1.2 [12]

For any graph G, χΣ(G)Δ(G)+3.

Since χa(G)χΣ(G) for any graph G, Conjecture 1.2 implies Conjecture 1.1. Conjecture 1.2 was confirmed for complete graphs, cycles, bipartite graphs and subcubic graphs in [12]. Dong and Wang [5] showed that Conjecture 1.2 holds for some sparse graphs. Yao et al. [23], [24] considered tnsd-coloring of degenerate graphs. [6], [14] considered the list version of tnsd-coloring of graphs. [7], [10], [11], [17], [18], [19], [20] considered tnsd-coloring of planar graphs with cycle restrictions. Song and Xu [16] determined χΣ(G) for any K4-minor free graph G with Δ(G) ≥ 5. Li et al. [9] showed that Conjecture 1.2 holds for planar graphs with maximum degree at least 13, and subsequently the result was improved by Qu et al. [13] and by Yang et al. [22]. Cheng et al. [3] showed that if G is a planar graph with Δ(G) ≥ 14, then χΣ(G)Δ(G)+2. Recently, Song et al. [15] improved this result and get that:

Theorem 1.1 [15]

Let G be a planar graph with maximum degree Δ(G). Then χΣ(G)max{Δ(G)+2,14}.

In this paper, we get the following results.

Theorem 1.2

Let G be a planar graph without adjacent maximum degree vertices. Then χΣ(G)max{Δ(G)+1,14}.

Since χΣ(G)Δ(G)+1 for any graph G, and if G has adjacent Δ(G)-vertices, then χΣ(G)Δ(G)+2. Thus we get the following corollary.

Corollary 1.1

Let G be a planar graph and Δ(G) ≥ 13. If G has no adjacent Δ(G)-vertices, then χΣ(G)=Δ(G)+1, otherwise χΣ(G)=Δ(G)+2.

Clearly, this result implies the result in [21].

Section snippets

Preliminaries

For any graph G, set ni(G)=|{vV(G)dG(v)=i}| for each positive integer. A graph G′ is smaller than G if one of the following holds:

  • (1)

    |E(G′)| < |E(G)|;

  • (2)

    |E(G)|=|E(G)| and (nt(G),nt1(G),,n1(G)) precedes (nt(G),nt1(G),, n1(G)) with respect to the standard lexicographic order, where t=max{Δ(G),Δ(G)}.

A graph is minimum for a property when no smaller graph satisfies it.

Let P=P(x1,x2,,xn) be a polynomial in n (n ≥ 1) variables. Set cP(x1k1x2k2xnkn) be the coefficient of the monomial x1k1x2k2x

The proof of Theorem 1.2

We will prove Theorem 1.2 by contradiction. Let G be a minimum counterexample of Theorem 1.2. Let k = max {Δ(G)+1,14}. By the choice of G, any planar graph G′ without adjacent Δ(G′)-vertices which is smaller than G has a k-tnsd-coloring ϕ′. In the following, we will choose some planar graph G′ smaller than G and extend the coloring ϕ′ of G′ to the desired coloring ϕ of G to obtain a contradiction. Without special remark, for any x ∈ (V(G) ∪ E(G)) ∩ (V(G′) ∪ E(G′)), let ϕ(x)=ϕ(x). For a vertex v

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671232), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (A2015202301), the University Science and Technology Project of Hebei Province (ZD2015106, QN2017044).

References (25)

  • N. Alon

    Combinatorial Nullstellensatz

    Comb. Probab. Comput.

    (1999)
  • J. Bondy et al.

    Graph Theory with Applications

    (1976)
  • ChengX. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of planar graphs with maximum degree δ

    Discrete Appl. Math.

    (2015)
  • ChengX. et al.

    The adjacent vertex distinguishing total chromatic numbers of planar graphs with Δ=10

    J. Comb. Optim.

    (2017)
  • DongA. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of graphs with bounded maximum average degree

    Acta. Math. Sin.

    (2014)
  • DingL. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings via the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz

    Sci. China Math.

    (2014)
  • S. Ge, J. Li, C. Xu, Neighbor sum distinguishing total coloring of planar graphs without 5-cycles, Theoret. Comput....
  • HuangD. et al.

    Adjacent vertex distinguishing total coloring of planar graphs with large maximum degree

    Sci. Sin. Math

    (2012)
  • LiH. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of planar graphs

    J. Comb. Optim.

    (2015)
  • LiJ. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of planar graphs with girth at least 5

    Utilitas Math.

    (2017)
  • MaQ. et al.

    Neighbor sum distinguishing total colorings of planar graphs without short cycles

    Utilitas Math.

    (2015)
  • M. Pilśniak et al.

    On the total-neighbor-distinguishing index by sums

    Graphs Combin.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Note on the group edge irregularity strength of graphs

      2019, Applied Mathematics and Computation
    • Neighbor Sum Distinguishing Total Colorings of Corona of Subcubic Graphs

      2021, Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text