On the extremal Sombor index of trees with a given diameter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126731Get rights and content

Highlights

  • As a new vertex-degree-based topological indices, the Sombor index studied in this paper differs from the earlier vertex-degree-based topological indices because it has a peculiar geometric interpretation.

  • All the n-order trees with diameter 3 are ordered with respect to the Sombor index.

  • The largest and the second largest Sombor indices of n-vertex trees with a given diameter d4 are determined and the corresponding trees are characterized.

  • For nd=3, we characterize the extremal n-order trees which reach from the third to the fourth (resp. the sixth, the seventh) largest Sombor indices with d=4 (resp. d=5,d6). For nd4, we characterize the extremal n-order trees which reach from the third to the fifth (resp. the eighth, the ninth) largest Sombor indices with d=4 (resp. d=5,d6).

  • As consequences, the top four n-order trees with respect to the Sombor index are characterized.

Abstract

Based on elementary geometry, Gutman proposed a novel graph invariants called the Sombor index SO(G), which is defined as SO(G)=uvE(G)dG2(u)+dG2(v), where dG(u) and dG(v) denote the degree of u and v in G, respectively. It has been proved that the Sombor index could predict some physicochemical properties. In this paper, we characterize the extremal graphs with respect to the Sombor index among all the n-order trees with a given diameter. Firstly, we order the trees with respect to the Sombor index among the n-vertex trees with diameter 3. Then, we determine the largest and the second largest Sombor indices of n-vertex trees with a given diameter d4 and characterize the corresponding trees. Moreover, for nd=3, we characterize the extremal n-order trees which reach from the third to the fourth (resp. the sixth, the seventh) largest Sombor indices with d=4 (resp. d=5,d6). For nd4, we characterize the extremal n-order trees which reach from the third to the fifth (resp. the eighth, the ninth) largest Sombor indices with d=4 (resp. d=5,d6). As consequences, the top four n-order trees with respect to the Sombor index are characterized.

Introduction

In this paper, we only consider connected, simple and undirected graphs. As usual, let Pn and Sn denote the path and the star on n vertices, respectively. For a set U, denote by |U| its cardinality. All the notation and terminology not defined here we refer the reader to Bondy and Murty [1].

Let G=(VG,EG) be a graph with vertex set VG and edge set EG. Denote by nG:=|VG| and mG:=|EG| the order and the size of G, respectively. For a vertex vVG, the set of its neighbors in G is denoted by NG(v) and its degree in G is defined as dG(v):=|NG(v)|. If dG(v)=1, then v is called a pendant vertex (or a leaf) of G and the unique edge incident with a pendant vertex v is called a pendant edge of G. For E0EG, let GE0 be the graph obtained from G by deleting all the edges in E0. Similarly, for E0EG=, let G+E0 be the graph obtained from G by adding all the edges in E0. Specially, if E0={uv}, then we denote Guv:=G{uv} and G+uv:=G+{uv} for short, respectively.

For {u,v}VG, a uv path, written as PG(u,v), is a path connecting u and v in G. The distance between u and v in G, denoted by dG(u,v), is the length of a shortest path connecting them. The diameter of a graph G is defined as diam(G)=max{u,v}VG{dG(u,v)}. A u,v-path is called a diametrical path of G if mPG(u,v)=dG(u,v)=diam(G).

Topological indices, also called the graph invariants, are often used to study some properties of molecule graphs and characterize their structure. Back in the 1970s, the first and the second Zagreb indices M1 and M2 were introduced in [15], [16] and defined asM1=M1(G)=vVGdG2(v)=uvEG(dG(u)+dG(v)),M2=M2(G)=uvEGdG(u)dG(v),where dG(u) and dG(v) denote the degree of u and v in G, respectively. Then, a variety of the vertex-degree-based graph invariants have been introduced and were extensively studied, such as the first and the second hyper-Zagreb index, the Randić index, the forgotten index, the inverse degree, the general sum-connectivity index, the geometric-arithmetic index and the arithmetic-geometric index.

Usually, topological indices play significant roles in mathematical chemistry especially in the QSPR/QSAR investigations. One of the most general problems in graph theory is to find out the extremal values regarding to some graph invariant and characterize all the corresponding extremal graphs. For recent advances we refer to [4], [5], [12], [18], [19], [24] and so on.

Among the vertex-degree-based graph invariants, the forgotten index [11], [15] and the reciprocal sum-connectivity index [25] were defined asF(G)=uvEG(dG2(v)+dG2(v)),χ12=uvEGdG(u)+dG(v).Mainly based on them, very recently, Gutman [13] defined the Sombor index as follows:SO(G)=uvE(G)dG2(u)+dG2(v).

In [13], [14], Gutman also presented some properties of the Sombor index and characterize the maximal and minimal graphs with respect to the Sombor index over the set of simple graphs, simple and connected graphs and trees. By using some graph parameters, Das et al. [7] gave some lower and upper bounds on the Sombor index of graphs and obtain several relations between the Sombor index and the first and second Zagreb indices of graphs. Wang et al. [23] establish some relations between the Sombor index and some other well-known vertex-degree-based indices of graphs.

Deng, Tang and Wu obtained a sharp upper bound for the Sombor index among all molecular trees with fixed number of vertices. Meanwhile, the chemical importance of the Sombor index was investigated and it was shown that this new index may be useful in predicting physicochemical properties with high accuracy compared to some well-established and often used indices, which can be seen in [9]. Cruz et al. [3] characterized the extremal graph with respect to the Sombor index over the set of chemical graphs, chemical trees and hexagonal systems. In [6], the extremal values of the Sombor index among the unicyclic graphs (resp. bicyclic graphs) were determined. The graphs with a given clique number (resp. chromatic number, number of pendant vertices) attaining the lower and the upper bounds of the Sombor index were characterized in [8]. More results of Sombor indices can be found in [2], [10], [17], [20], [21], [22].

In this paper, we characterize the extremal graphs with respect to the Sombor index among all the n-vertex trees with a given diameter. For convenience, let Tnd be the set of all the n-vertex trees with diameter d and Tn be the set of all the n-vertex trees. Obviously, Tn=d=1n1Tnd. It is easy to check that Tn1={P2} and Tn2={Sn}. So we mainly consider d3 in the whole article. Let Tn3={Sa,na|a=2,,n2}, where Sa,na is a double star which can be obtained from two stars Sa and Sna by adding an edge between their center vertices.

Our first main result orders all the trees among Tn3 according to the Sombor index.

Theorem 1.1

Among Tn3 one has SO(S2,n2)>SO(S3,n3)>>SO(Sn2,n2).

For d4 and nd+1, let Tnd,i be an n-vertex tree obtained from Pd+1=v0v1vd by adding nd1 pendant vertices to vi for i{1,2,,d1} as depicted in Fig. 1. Obviously, Tnd,1Tnd,d1, we denote Tnd:=Tnd,1 for short.

Our next main result determines the largest and the second largest Sombor indices of n-vertex trees with diameter d4. The corresponding extremal trees are also characterized.

Theorem 1.2

Let T be in Tnd with d4. We have the following:

  • (i)

    SO(T)(nd)1+(nd+1)2+4+(nd+1)2+(d3)8+5 with equality if and only if TTnd, where Tnd=Tnd,1Tnd,d1;

  • (ii)

    If T¬Tnd, then SO(T)(nd1)1+(nd+1)2+24+(nd+1)2+(d4)8+25 with equality if and only if T{Tnd,i:i=2,3,,d2},

where the graphs Tnd,i for i=1,2,,d1 are depicted in Fig. 1.

For d4,nd+3, let Pd+1=v0v1vd. Then, for i,j{1,2,,d1}, let Tnd,i,j be an n-vertex tree obtained from the path Pd+1 by attaching nd2 (resp. 1) pendant edges to vi (resp. vj); see Fig. 2. For convenience, let Hnd:={Tnd,i,j:i,j=1,2,,d1}.

In the next two main results, we consider the trees among Tnd{Tnd,i:i=1,2,,d1}. On the one hand, we show that the Sombor index of any tree THnd is less than those of trees among Hnd. On the other hand, we order all the trees among Hnd according to the Sombor index.

Theorem 1.3

Let T be in Tnd{Tnd,i:i=1,2,,d1} with d4 and nd=3.

  • (i)

    H74={T74,1,3,T74,1,2} with SO(T74,1,3)>SO(T74,1,2) and SO(T74,1,2)>SO(T) for any tree TH74;

  • (ii)

    H85={T85,1,4,T85,1,3,T85,1,2,T85,2,3} with SO(T85,1,4)>SO(T85,1,3)>SO(T85,1,2)>SO(T85,2,3) and SO(T85,2,3)>SO(T) for any tree TH85;

  • (iii)

    If d6, then SO(Tnd,1,d1)>SO(Tnd,1,3)==SO(Tnd,1,d2)>SO(Tnd,1,2)>SO(Tnd,2,4)==SO(Tnd,2,d2)==SO(Tnd,d4,d2)>SO(Tnd,2,3)==SO(Tnd,d3,d2) for the trees in Hnd and SO(Tnd,2,3)>SO(T) for any tree THnd.

Theorem 1.4

Let T be in Tnd{Tnd,i:i=1,2,,d1} with d4 and nd4.

  • (i)

    If d=4, then SO(Tn4,1,3)>SO(Tn4,1,2)>SO(Tn4,2,1) for the trees in Hn4 and SO(Tn4,2,1)>SO(T) for any tree THn4;

  • (ii)

    If d=5, then SO(Tn5,1,4)>SO(Tn5,1,3)>SO(Tn5,3,1)>SO(Tn5,1,2)>SO(Tn5,2,1)>SO(Tn5,2,3)=SO(Tn5,3,2) for the trees in Hn5 and SO(Tn5,2,3)>SO(T) for any tree THn5;

  • (iii)

    If d6, then SO(Tnd,1,d1)>SO(Tnd,1,3)==SO(Tnd,1,d2)>SO(Tnd,3,1)==SO(Tnd,d2,1)>SO(Tnd,1,2)>SO(Tnd,2,1)>SO(Tnd,2,4)==SO(Tnd,2,d2)==SO(Tnd,d4,d2)>SO(Tnd,2,3)==SO(Tnd,d3,d2) for the trees in Hnd and SO(Tnd,2,3)>SO(T) for any tree THnd.

Recall that Tn is the set of all the n-vertex trees. Clearly, Pn is the unique tree for n=1 or 2. In our last main result, we consider that n3 and characterize the top four largest trees among Tn with respect to the Sombor index.

Theorem 1.5

Let T be in Tn{Sn,S2,n2,S3,n3,Tn4} with n3. Then SO(T)<SO(Tn4)<SO(S3,n3)<SO(S2,n2)<SO(Sn).

Section snippets

Some preliminaries

In this section, we give some preliminary lemmas. For convenience, we denote h(x,y)=x2+y2 for x1, y1 and let l(x,y)=h(x,y)h(x1,y) for x2, y1.

Lemma 2.1

[13]

For x1,y1, h(x,y)=h(y,x) and h(x,y) is strictly increasing on x (resp. y).

Lemma 2.2

h(n1,1)>h(n2,2)>>h(n2,n2)=h(n2,n2)<<h(2,n2)<h(1,n1).

Proof

Let f(x)=h(x,nx)=x2+(nx)2, we only need to prove that f(x) is strictly increasing on xn2 while strictly decreasing on xn2. By direct calculation, the derivative of f(x) isf(x)=12·2x2(nx)x2+(nx)2=2xnx2+(

Proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2

In this section, we give the proofs of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Clearly, Tn3={Sa,na|a=2,,n2}, where Sa,na is a double star obtained from two stars Sa and Sna by adding an edge between their center vertices. In order to complete the proof, it suffices to show SO(Sa,na)>SO(Sa+1,na1) for 2an21.

Recall that h(x,y)=x2+y2 and l(x,y)=h(x,y)h(x1,y). By (1.1) one hasSO(Sa+1,na1)SO(Sa,na)=ah(a+1,1)+(na2)h(na1,1)+h(a+1,na1)(a1)h(a,1)(na1)h(na,1)h(a,na)=(a1)[h(a+1,1)h(a,1)](n

Proofs of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4

In this section, we give the proofs of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4. Recall that P=v0v1vd is a diametrical path of T and T(vi) be the component of TEP with viT(vi) for all i{0,1,2,,d}. Clearly, dT(v0)=dT(vd)=1 and T(v1) (resp. T(vd1)) is a star with center v1 (resp. vd1).

In order to prove our results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 4.1

Let T be in Tnd satisfying that SO(T) is as large as possible. For every i{2,3,d2}, if T(vi) is not a star with center vi, then T(vi) is a tree obtained from a star S

Proof of Theorem 1.5

In this section, we give the proof of Theorem 1.5. That is, we characterize the extremal graphs with respect to the Sombor index among the set of all the n-vertex trees. Clearly, Pn is the unique tree for n=1 or 2. We only consider that n3 and it is easy to get that d2.

Recall that Tn is the set of all the n-vertex trees. Clearly, T3={S3}, our result is obvious. Now we consider n4. Note that Tn2={Sn},Tn3={Sa,na|a=2,,n2} and by (1.1) one hasSO(Sn)SO(S2,n2)=(n1)n22n+2(n3)n24n+5n24n+

References (25)

  • H.Y. Deng et al.

    Molecular trees with extremal values of Sombor indices

    Int. J. Quantum Chem.

    (2021)
  • X.N. Fang et al.

    The expected values of Sombor indices in random hexagonal chains, phenylene chains and Sombor indices of some chemical graphs

    Int. J. Quantum. Chem.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Extremal unicyclic graphs of Sombor index

      2024, Applied Mathematics and Computation
    • The k-Sombor Index of Trees

      2024, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The first author acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11671164, 12171190) and the third author acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11901179), the Research ability cultivation fund of HUAS (Grant No. 2020kypytd006) and the Scientific research initial funding of Hubei University of Arts and Science.

    View full text