Dengue models based on machine learning techniques: A systematic literature review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102157Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dengue models based on machine learning techniques are reviewed.

  • Logistic models are the most used for the diagnosis of dengue.

  • The spatial-temporal analysis is the most widely used approach to predicting dengue.

  • This paper identifies challenges and future works on dengue modeling.

Abstract

Background

Dengue modeling is a research topic that has increased in recent years. Early prediction and decision-making are key factors to control dengue. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) analyzes three modeling approaches of dengue: diagnostic, epidemic, intervention. These approaches require models of prediction, prescription and optimization. This SLR establishes the state-of-the-art in dengue modeling, using machine learning, in the last years.

Methods

Several databases were selected to search the articles. The selection was made based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Sixty-four articles were obtained and analyzed to describe their strengths and limitations. Finally, challenges and opportunities for research on machine-learning for dengue modeling were identified.

Results

Logistic regression was the most used modeling approach for the diagnosis of dengue (59.1%). The analysis of the epidemic approach showed that linear regression (17.4%) is the most used technique within the spatial analysis. Finally, the most used intervention modeling is General Linear Model with 70%.

Conclusions

We conclude that cause-effect models may improve diagnosis and understanding of dengue. Models that manage uncertainty can also be helpful, because of low data-quality in healthcare. Finally, decentralization of data, using federated learning, may decrease computational costs and allow model building without compromising data security.

Introduction

Dengue is a vector-borne disease, with high importance in public health [1]. This disease is widely distributed worldwide; especially, in tropical and subtropical areas [2]. The disease is produced by an arbovirus (DENV) that receives the same name. To date, four virus serotypes have been identified: DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3 and DENV-4 [3]. The infection is transmitted to humans by the bite of mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, mainly A. aegypti and A. albopictus [4].

In 1997, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified the disease like dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever [5]. A new classification was proposed in 2009, which was based on the severity level of the disease: non-severe dengue (with or without warning signs) and severe dengue (SD). This last includes the dengue shock syndrome (DSS) [6]. According to the WHO, more than 350 million dengue virus infections occur annually worldwide. In addition, 20,000 deaths related to dengue in the same period of time [7].

Dengue has been the subject of various studies worldwide. Its high prevalence in tropical and subtropical regions of the world has generated interest in its diagnosis, treatment and control. Different systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have been carried out of dengue. Most of them have been focused on the evaluation of molecules for the generation of vaccines, control of transmission, epidemiology and development of rapid-detection tests. In what follows, we briefly explain previous SLRs.

Several SLRs have described the epidemiology of dengue. Jing and Wang [8] showed the epidemiology of dengue according to its geographical and temporal distribution. Besides, Jing and Wang evaluated risk factors for transmission and control of dengue. Alhaeli et al. [9] conducted a review of the epidemiology of dengue in Saudi Arabia, where environmental conditions are extreme. Other reviews on the epidemiology of dengue have been carried out in different countries, such as Pakistan [10], Thailand [11], Malaysia [12], Philippines [13], Mexico [14] and Brazil [15]. Finally, Villar et al. [1] conducted a SLR of the epidemiological trends of dengue, in Colombia, for over 12 years (2000−2011).

Another group of SLRs has focused on the production of rapid-detection tests and vaccines against the virus. For instance, Lim et al. [16] and Luo et al. [17] conducted reviews and meta-analyses to assess the economic impact of rapid-screening tests. Reviews have also been conducted to identify the latest economic studies of dengue vaccination [18,19]. For the development of dengue vaccines, it has been evaluated the immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of the vaccine [20,21,22].

In recent years, with the emergence of machine learning and the increase in data generation, computational methods have been developed for the prediction and evaluation of disease-transmission dynamics. This has generated interest for SLRs on this subject, to know the latest developments and opportunities in this domain. As an example, Louis et al. [23] developed an SLR of dengue to identify the main modeling approaches of the disease risk. Another SLR on computational methods was conducted by Naish et al. [24], focusing on quantitative modeling with respect to climate change. Andraud et al. [25] conducted a review of deterministic models of dengue transmission to identify features for future models. Finally, Lourenço et al. [26] published a review of the challenges in dengue research from a computational perspective. The authors focused on real-time data collection, genetic analysis and integrative modeling approaches. Particularly, integrative-modeling approaches simulate the epidemiology and molecular evolution of the virus.

We present a review of three modeling approaches of dengue: diagnostic, epidemic and intervention. The goal is to present the development of machine learning models for these contexts. The first approach is to determine whether a patient has dengue or any of its variants. The second is to analyze the population-level dengue epidemic; in addition, to study morbidity and mortality rates. The third is to analyze the impact of interventions to mitigate epidemics of dengue. To date, there is no SLR that studies these three aspects related to the disease together. In addition, it is the first SLR to focus on models to evaluate the impact of interventions to mitigate dengue epidemics. Finally, this SLR establishes the state-of-the-art in these approaches, and, additionally, defines new challenges and opportunities for future research. The objectives of this SLR are:

  • To collect and describe machine learning models for dengue.

  • To visualize challenges for future work in dengue modeling.

The present document is structured as follows: Section 2 describes search and selection process of relevant articles; Section 3 describes general results of the research; Section 4 discusses the papers, as well as the challenges and opportunities for research on dengue modeling for diagnosis, epidemics and interventions to control dengue. The last section shows the conclusions, with a description of the works that would be a priority to develop in this research domain.

Section snippets

Methodology

This review was based on the PRISMA methodology [27]. The first step is to establish research questions; the second is to define a search strategy to delimit the findings; the third is to select the papers using eligibility criteria; and, finally, the last is to analyze the articles to extract strengths, limitations and challenges to overcome. To achieve the goal of this review, three research questions were proposed:

Q1

Which machine learning models have been developed for dengue diagnosis?

Q2

Which

Analysis of reviewed papers

Sixty-four articles were reviewed and analyzed to find what has been developed on diagnostic, epidemic and intervention modeling of dengue.

Discussion

Dengue modeling is a key tool for early detection of dengue, evaluation of risk factors for SD, and may also be useful to control vectors that transmit the disease. Although extensive works have been done on these issues, it is important to know what aspects of dengue modeling have not been worked on, to develop future works that will allow a significant decrease in disease morbidity rates. The main objective of this work was to give an overview of diagnostic, epidemic and intervention

Conclusions

We conducted an SLR on dengue modeling based on machine learning. The main objective was to know about diagnostic, epidemic and intervention models that have been developed for the disease. Sixty-four articles were selected and analyzed from several scientific libraries, to find out the state-of-the-art in the three approaches mentioned above. The results show that dengue modeling is constantly growing.

The most frequent diagnostic models were based on LoR. LoR is one of the most used modeling

CRediT authorship contribution statement

All authors have participated in the design of the original study, data analysis, interpretation of results. They also participated in the writing, review and approval of the final manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by Colombian Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation - COLCIENCIAS (grant number 111572553478) (M. Toro) and Colombian Ministry of Science and Technology Bicentennial PhD Grant (W. Hoyos).

References (119)

  • E. Gurian et al.

    Differentiation between stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

    Anal Chim Acta

    (2020)
  • S. Khan et al.

    Analysis of tuberculosis disease through Raman spectroscopy and machine learning

    Photodiagn Photodyn Ther

    (2018)
  • A. Pérez et al.

    Diagnosis of chagas disease from human blood serum using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy and chemometric methods

    Sens Bio-Sens Res

    (2018)
  • C.Y. Lin et al.

    High levels of serum hyaluronan is an early predictor of dengue warning signs and perturbs vascular integrity

    EBioMedicine

    (2019)
  • G. Rossi et al.

    The spread of mosquito-borne viruses in modern times: A spatio-temporal analysis of dengue and chikungunya

    Spatial Spatio-temporal Epidemiol

    (2018)
  • E. Delmelle et al.

    A spatial model of socioeconomic and environmental determinants of dengue fever in Cali, Colombia

    Acta Trop

    (2016)
  • L. Mao et al.

    Mapping intra-urban transmission risk of dengue fever with big hourly cellphone data

    Acta Trop

    (2016)
  • S.R. Mutheneni et al.

    Spatial distribution and cluster analysis of dengue using self organizing maps in Andhra Pradesh, India, 2011–2013

    Parasite Epidemiol Contr

    (2018)
  • P.A. Reyes-Castro et al.

    Spatio-temporal and neighborhood characteristics of two dengue outbreaks in two arid cities of Mexico

    Acta Trop

    (2017)
  • M.C.P. Parra et al.

    Using adult Aedes aegypti females to predict areas at risk for dengue transmission: a spatial case-control study

    Acta Trop

    (2018)
  • F. Ding et al.

    Mapping the spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus

    Acta Trop

    (2018)
  • G. Jácome et al.

    Present and future incidence of dengue fever in Ecuador nationwide and coast region scale using species distribution modeling for climate variability’s effect

    Ecol Model

    (2019)
  • C.H. Wu et al.

    Open data mining for Taiwan’s dengue epidemic

    Acta Trop

    (2018)
  • R.A. Strauss et al.

    Google dengue trends: an indicator of epidemic behavior

    Venezuelan Case Int J Med Informatics

    (2017)
  • R.C. Souza et al.

    Where did I get dengue? Detecting spatial clusters of infection risk with social network data

    Spatial Spatio-temporal Epidemiol

    (2019)
  • K. Kalimuthu et al.

    Control of dengue and Zika virus vector Aedes aegypti using the predatory copepod Megacyclops formosanus: synergy with Hedychium coronarium-synthesized silver nanoparticles and related histological changes in targeted mosquitoes

    Process Saf Environ Prot

    (2017)
  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Biological control of Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) using Metarhizium anisopliae JEF-003 millet grain

    J Asia Pac Entomol

    (2015)
  • L.A. Villar et al.

    Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Colombia (2000−2011): a systematic review

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2015)
  • B. Martina et al.

    Dengue virus pathogenesis: an integrated view

    (2009)
  • World Health Organization

    Dengue hemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control

  • World Health Organization

    Dengue guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control: new edition

  • World Health Organization

    Dengue and severe dengue

  • A. Alhaeli et al.

    The epidemiology of dengue fever in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review

    (2016)
  • J.M. Humphrey et al.

    Dengue in the Middle East and North Africa: a systematic review

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2016)
  • K. Limkittikul et al.

    Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Thailand (2000–2011): a systematic literature review

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2014)
  • A.H. Mohd-Zaki et al.

    Epidemiology of dengue disease in Malaysia (2000−2012): a systematic literature review

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2014)
  • L. Bravo et al.

    Epidemiology of dengue disease in the Philippines (2000–2011): a systematic literature review

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2014)
  • H.G. Dantés et al.

    Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Mexico (2000–2011): a systematic literature search and analysis

    PLoS Negl Trop Dis

    (2014)
  • M.G. Teixeira et al.

    Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Brazil (2000−2010): a systematic literature search and analysis

    (2013)
  • J.K. Lim et al.

    A systematic review of the economic impact of rapid diagnostic tests for dengue

    BMC Health Serv Res

    (2017)
  • R. Luo et al.

    Rapid diagnostic tests for determining dengue serostatus: a systematic review and key informant interviews

    (2019)
  • I.C. Endo et al.

    The economic promise of developing and implementing dengue vaccines: evidence from a systematic review

    (2016)
  • R. Agarwal et al.

    The immunogenicity and safety of CYD-Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine (CYD-TDV) in children and adolescents: a systematic review

    Acta Med Indones

    (2017)
  • L.T.C. Da Silveira et al.

    Systematic review of dengue vaccine efficacy

    (2019)
  • I.P. Godói et al.

    CYD-TDV dengue vaccine: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, immunogenicity and safety

    (2017)
  • V.R. Louis et al.

    Modeling tools for dengue risk mapping - a systematic review

    Int J Health Geogr

    (2014)
  • S. Naish et al.

    Climate change and dengue: a critical and systematic review of quantitative modeling approaches

    BMC Infect Dis

    (2014)
  • M. Andraud et al.

    Dynamic epidemiological models for dengue transmission: a systematic review of structural approaches

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • J. Lourenço et al.

    Challenges in dengue research: a computational perspective

    Evol Appl

    (2018)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text